I have xymon installed on several servers and it appears that the only thing
I can monitor is CPU LOAD which is different from CPU % utilization. Has anyone
found a way to get CPU Utilization instead of CPU Load?
Thanks
Jim P.
Hi Mark.
my intent is to hide the code. I believe that most people wont invest time
in trying to investigate it, but who knows. Any other laternative to
protect bash code, or should I look into a different language?
ITschak
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Mark Post wrote:
>
I wonder if any of you tried this freeware. I was able to install it on
Centos 7, but it seems that the makefile is not sutable for SUSE or SUSE
for z.. Below is the make file. I replaced the CC with gcc but am not
familier with the parms requires.
# Makefile
#
INSTALL_PATH = /usr/local
# For
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 02:43 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> I wonder if any of you tried this freeware.
It's not freeware. It's licensed under the GNU GPL 3. Two extremely different
things.
> I was able to install it on
> Centos 7, but it seems that the makefile is not sutable
Paul, the script may run on other people's server which I do not have
control over.
ITschak
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Paul Flint wrote:
> Greetings Itschak,
>
> You could protect your bash source by the Unix permissions...
>
> I know it sound niaf, in this day and age
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 03:42 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> Hi Mark.
>
> my intent is to hide the code. I believe that most people wont invest time
Perhaps not, but if you believe it to be worth protecting, do it right.
> in trying to investigate it, but who knows. Any other
Mark,
A comfort to know that it is not Freeware...
Regards,
Paul
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Mark Post wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:13:21 -0700
From: Mark Post
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SHC bash script compiler
Greetings Itschak,
Just to be clear, this code is not Open Source but Freeware.
FWIW I would not install freeware.
Regards,
Flint
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:43:44 +0200
From: Itschak Mugzach
Reply-To: i_mugz...@securiteam.co.il
Well, there are many reasons why to hide the code from others. my reason is
that the code will run on other people's servers and I don't want them to
look into. it include how I do what I do, certificates, etc. file system
protection is not sufficient if I can't control it.
ITschak
On Wed, Feb
Itschak,
I completely agree with your reasons!
I am giving a presentation on bash in June at the VM Workshop in
Cleveland.
Regards,
Paul Flint
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:04:10 +0200
From: Itschak Mugzach
Reply-To: Linux on
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Paul Flint wrote:
> Greetings Itschak,
>
> You could protect your bash source by the Unix permissions...
>
> I know it sound niaf, in this day and age with everyone havin root, but
> thought it worth mentioning.
>
Can you run a BASH script which
I accept that. does SLES supports Assembler 390 ;-) If it should be C, C it
will be.
Thanks.
ITschak
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 2/8/2017 at 03:42 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> > Hi Mark.
> >
> > my intent is to hide the code.
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 04:01 PM, Paul Flint wrote:
> Just to be clear, this code is not Open Source but Freeware.
You have that 100% backward. The shc package is open source since it is
licensed under an OSI approved license: GNU GPL V3.
Mark Post
>
> I accept that. does SLES supports Assembler 390 ;-) If it should be C, C it
> will be.
>
> Thanks.
> ITschak
>
Yes - you can use our assembler to write HLASM-style programs
on s390x SLES.
- Dave Rivers -
--
riv...@dignus.comWork: (919) 676-0847
Get your
The reason I choose bash was that you nothing to install, so it will run on any
standard Linux. Not sure about the assemblers and I was a bit joking. C looks
an equal solution.
ITschak
נשלח מה-iPad שלי
ב-8 בפבר׳ 2017, בשעה 23:54, Mark Post כתב/ה:
On 2/8/2017 at
Greetings Itschak,
You could protect your bash source by the Unix permissions...
I know it sound niaf, in this day and age with everyone havin root, but
thought it worth mentioning.
Regards,
Paul
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Itschak naive wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:42:37 +0200
From: Itschak
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 04:26 PM, Paul Flint wrote:
> A comfort to know that it is not Freeware...
It shouldn't be. Neither "open source" nor "freeware" by themselves are any
indication of quality.
Mark Post
--
Mark,
The difference between Freeware and Open Source is critical and has to do
with the overloading of the word "free". One is an economic issue the
other an issue of liberty.
Get back to me if this is not clear.
Regards,
Flint
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Mark Post wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Feb
I started in the business in 1972. Our local college had an 8k IBM 1130
Almost immediately, I wanted to find out move about it. After graduation, I
went to work at my present employer(Baldor). After 40 years here, I have
accepted an early retirement.
I enjoyed the people on the mailing
19 matches
Mail list logo