Hi,
I've just installed our first RHEL4.4 Linux under z/VM 5.3 (RSU 0703) and we
have a slight issue with the fdisk and fsck commands in that they don't
recognise the partitions on the 3390 minidisks that Linux is using for it's
dasda disk:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fdisk -l
Note: sector size
documents
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Edmund R. MacKenty
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:30 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: fsck/fdisk issues under z/VM
On Wednesday 12 March 2008 09:16, Guest, Darren wrote:
I've just
such things), the best thing to do is log
onto your Linux guest via SSH (or Telnet, if your site doesn't use SSH)
discover the PID of your running cat testfile process, and then
issue a kill -9 pid to stop it.
Hope this helps.
Guest, Darren wrote:
Hi,
This is probably a very dumb question but how
Hi,
We are implementing a DataGuard solution to sync data with our DR system.
Does anyone have any idea how much capacity a single z10 EC IFL at the DR end
(ie: the DataGuard receiving system) would be able to handle, eg: redo log
rates in GB/hour?
The IFL would be running Oracle 11.2.0.3.2
Hi Mikael,
I believe you're OK providing you're on the same type of machine (ie: z/Series
to z/Series is fine).
We're about to do this (z196 to z10 EC) so I'll let you know if it works!! :-)
Cheers,
Darren
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU]
Hi all,
Our Linux team has just upgraded some of our SLES11 SP1 systems (running under
z/VM 6.2 on a zEC12) to SP3. The systems run Oracle and the Oracle test bods
report that Oracle is now 10-20% slower. They identified Oracle SR 13074706 and
applied it. Although that helped, they still think
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES11 SP3 v SP1
On 11/13/2014 at 06:26 AM, Guest, Darren
darren.gu...@uk.experian.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Our Linux team has just upgraded some of our SLES11 SP1 systems
(running under z/VM 6.2 on a zEC12) to SP3. The systems run Oracle and
the Oracle test bods report
Absolutely! :-)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: 19 November 2014 5:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES11 SP3 v SP1
On 11/19/2014 at 03:18 AM, Guest, Darren
darren.gu...@uk.experian.com
wrote
The 10Gb only have a single port, so if you're using both ports on the 1Gb then
you'll need 2 x 10Gb cards.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ron Wells
Sent: 25 March 2016 2:33 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: VSWITCH
I
Hi,
View Hardware Configuration on the SE will show you all the parts on the
machine. Be aware that if you're looking at storage, then you will need to take
RAIM into account (the physical DIMMs won't add up to the amount of storage
actually available).
Cheers,
Darren
-Original
Hi,
Has anyone used Relax and Recover on their Linux on z system?
Cheers,
Darren
Information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential, and may not be
copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed to any third
party without our permission. There is no intention
Hi,
My understanding is that having 5 IFLs on each LPAR would mean you'd have to
license all 10 IFLs on the box; the total of 20 logical IFLs would be
dispatched on all 10 physical IFLs.
I believe that if your total logical IFLs is 5 or less then you would be OK;
only 5 physical IFLs worth
Hi,
Not sure if people have seen that attached article or heard of the 'intel' chip
issues from elsewhere:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/02/intel_cpu_design_flaw/
The 'fix' for meltdown (at least) is apparently to change the Linux kernel
which will potentially affect performance. I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
