Already done.
On Feb 18, 2017 23:42, "Mark Post" wrote:
> >>> On 2/17/2017 at 02:03 AM, Christer Solskogen <
> christer.solsko...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Both "read_vaule -s" and "read_value -c" gives return_code=-2. This is
> > running on zVM 6.2 on a zEC12.
> > return_value -V
>>> On 2/17/2017 at 02:03 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> Both "read_vaule -s" and "read_value -c" gives return_code=-2. This is
> running on zVM 6.2 on a zEC12.
> return_value -V gives
> Version 1.0 2015-10-12 13:31.
Based on this, I think you should open up a
I tried running the same LPAR (and Linux) on z13. Same error.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Christer Solskogen <
christer.solsko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Both "read_vaule -s" and "read_value -c" gives return_code=-2. This is
> running on zVM 6.2 on a zEC12.
> return_value -V gives
> Version 1.0
Both "read_vaule -s" and "read_value -c" gives return_code=-2. This is
running on zVM 6.2 on a zEC12.
return_value -V gives
Version 1.0 2015-10-12 13:31.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 2/16/2017 at 08:17 AM, Christer Solskogen <
>
>>> On 2/16/2017 at 08:17 AM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> Any by node name, you mean hostname?
> I still get it with a hostname that is only six characters long :/
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Waite, Dick (External) <
> dick.wa...@softwareag.com> wrote:
>
Any by node name, you mean hostname?
I still get it with a hostname that is only six characters long :/
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Waite, Dick (External) <
dick.wa...@softwareag.com> wrote:
> Grand Day,
> It's a known issue. I expect your node name is 8 chars long. There is a
> fix, sorry
Grand Day,
It's a known issue. I expect your node name is 8 chars long. There is a fix,
sorry I'm in the wilds at the moment. As a work-a-round us a 7 byte or less
node name.
__R
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Christer Solskogen
Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2017