Hi,
Just thought I'd add my 2-penneth worth to this (even if it is highly
off topic)
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Shadow Daemon wrote:
Actually, I recently installed RedHat 6.1 on a 486/8Mb. The trick was to
do a NFS install, and forget about the installation program the moment
the
Ok, Ok !
Bruce wrote:
I have a 386 AND a 486 that I am unable to bring up on Linux because the
current version requires more than 8 MB ram. The setup that I want
requires
the greater security that Linux brings over bloat 95-2k. Currently, I am
waiting with baited -- er, held -- breath for
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Bruce Irving wrote:
I have a 386 AND a 486 that I am unable to bring up on Linux because the
current version requires more than 8 MB ram. The setup that I want requires
the greater security that Linux brings over bloat 95-2k. Currently, I am
waiting with baited -- er,
"Dan" == Dan Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce I have a 386 AND a 486 that I am unable to bring up on Linux
Bruce because the current version requires more than 8 MB ram. The
Bruce setup that I want requires the greater security that Linux
Bruce brings over bloat 95-2k. Currently, I am
I have a 386 AND a 486 that I am unable to bring up on Linux because the
current version requires more than 8 MB ram. The setup that I want requires
No. The current Linux is fine in 4Mb. The distribution installers with all
their GUI garbage frequently require more. If you are trying to build
On 29 Feb, Alan Cox wrote:
I have a 386 AND a 486 that I am unable to bring up on Linux because the
current version requires more than 8 MB ram. The setup that I want requires
No. The current Linux is fine in 4Mb. The distribution installers with all
their GUI garbage frequently require
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Ken Yap wrote:
For the definitive list of Linux distributions, go to
lwn.net/bigpage.phtml There are a few tiny distributions listed there
that may install and run in as little as 2 MB.
We used to run a very useful system (6 concurrent users) on 3.5mb, mainly
running mail
Actually, I recently installed RedHat 6.1 on a 486/8Mb. The trick was to
do a NFS install, and forget about the installation program the moment
the shell-prompt appeared on the second console.
I had to custom-create the boot disk and root fs, but I've got
Slackware 7.0 running on a 386
last i checked freelsd required 5Mb to install/4Mb to run.
on the linux front the least demanding has allways been slackware since
you can setup swap before the instalation, and (at least for slackware
3.6) you didn't have to load the install image into a ramdisk
OK i have to get in somewhere,
I have a 386 AND a 486 that I am unable to bring up on Linux because the
current version requires more than 8 MB ram. The setup that I want requires
the greater security that Linux brings over bloat 95-2k. Currently, I am
waiting with baited -- er, held -- breath for ELKS to have networking
You might also try using a Slackware release as
they have install floppies for ow memory and some
docs on installing with low memory. I had a 386
with 2 meg. that ran pretty good. For graphics I
used X-win with Twm.
Regards
Helm.
--- Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 386 AND a
I have a 386 AND a 486 that I am unable to bring up on Linux because the
current version requires more than 8 MB ram. The setup that I want requires
the greater security that Linux brings over bloat 95-2k. Currently, I am
waiting with baited -- er, held -- breath for ELKS to have networking
Do any one had a linux ported to Hitachi processor.can elks can
be used
for embedded systems is there any one who is intrested for a linux
kernel
development.
There is a standard linux port for SH3
Alan
Hi ,
Do any one had a linux ported to Hitachi processor.can elks can
be used
for embedded systems is there any one who is intrested for a linux
kernel
development.
Hope to here from the hackers world and for a better development
karunendra babu
Hi all elks hackers.
I am one
14 matches
Mail list logo
