I managed to get a HP NX 6330 laptop to test HP laptop related issues
discussed here.
But the bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813 seems to
be NOT reproducible on my NX6330. This fact prompt if there are any
essential difference between NX6330 and NC6400. The BIOS of my NX6330
even
T43 2668-NG2 BIOS 1.23 EC 1.03
-Original Message-
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:59 AM
To: Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Brown, Len
Subject: Re: Bad libata resume behaviour due to ACPICA change (in
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote:
T43 2668-NG2 BIOS 1.23 EC 1.03
We use the same BIOS (TP-1Y), but you are using a very old version. A lot
might have changed since then, including AHCI support going away. I don't
think I ever run a 1.23 bios on my machine...
And I know for a
Hi,
Could you try the patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 to see if it's related?
Regards.
Konstantin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-acpi-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Demleitner
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:36 PM
To:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote:
T43 2668-NG2 BIOS 1.23 EC 1.03
I updated to 1.29/1.06 and still have 6 seconds resume time...
We use the same BIOS (TP-1Y), but you are using a very old version. A lot
might have changed since
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 19:58 +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
I managed to get a HP NX 6330 laptop to test HP laptop related issues
discussed here.
But the bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813 seems to
be NOT reproducible on my NX6330. This fact prompt if there are any
essential
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 16:09 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alessandro Guido [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make the sony_acpi use the backlight subsystem to adjust brightness value
instead of using the /proc/sony/brightness file. (Other settings will
still have a /proc/sony/... entry)
Le Tuesday 06 February 2007 01:09:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED], vous avez
écrit :
From: Matthew C Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adds support in asus_acpi for the Asus Z81SP laptop. This preserves all
old functionality when improperly detected as well as enabling Bluetooth
support.
I don't know if this
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:45:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm2:
...
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
acpi_os_readable() is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c |2 --
include/acpi/acpiosxf.h |3
From: Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following patch adds support for obtaining the status and ejecting
Ultrabay devices for the T60p Thinkpad; my guess is that it probably
works on T60 Thinkpads and probably more recent Lenovo latops as well.
With the 2.03 BIOS I have been able to eject a
This patch fixes a small memory leak on module removal, and does other
assorted minor cleanups on the module init codepath.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/ibm_acpi.c | 13 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Is your ioport included in the microsoft's list being blocked by XP?
Please give me an example (acpidump output from a real box)
that demonstrates ACPI is missing something which must be done
through native driver. I'm wondering the designer of the box should
already known AML code will directly
12 matches
Mail list logo