Linux-Advocacy Digest #255, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 03:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Conclusion (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Les Mikesell")
Re: Does Linux envy Microsoft? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear
Linux-Advocacy Digest #256, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 03:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Why NT? (Pete Goodwin)
Re: Does Linux envy Microsoft? (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: Does Linux envy Microsoft? (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: Does Linux envy Microsoft? (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: Why Hatred? (Pete
Linux-Advocacy Digest #257, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 04:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: open source is getting worst with time. ("kiwiunixman")
Re: Almost 60% Surveyed Plan To Install Windows 2000 ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Linux-Advocacy Digest #258, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 04:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: OEditors: Xedit vs. vi or emacs ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Microsoft hurts the reputation of software engineers. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Why NT? (Shane Phelps)
Re: RPM Hell ("kiwiunixman")
Re: Linux
Linux-Advocacy Digest #259, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 04:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Trouble logging in ("kiwiunixman")
Re: Operating Systems?
Linux-Advocacy Digest #260, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 05:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Suggestions for Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Operating
Linux-Advocacy Digest #261, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 05:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Why NT? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com ("David
Brown")
Re: Profitability of Linux being a challenge ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: linux does
Linux-Advocacy Digest #262, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 06:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Would Linux be invented if? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Question with Security on Linux/Unix versus Windows
Linux-Advocacy Digest #263, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 07:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Does Linux envy Microsoft? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: The 2.4.0 kernel was released at 4pm pst. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: open source is getting worst with time. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: open source is
Linux-Advocacy Digest #264, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 08:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (Bob Eager)
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (Bob Eager)
Re: Operating
Linux-Advocacy Digest #265, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 09:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com
(LShapingAtWhateverISP)
Re: Profitability of Linux being a challenge (*)
Re: Profitability of Linux being a challenge (John
Linux-Advocacy Digest #267, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 10:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Profitability of Linux being a challenge ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Red Hat dead/dying? (John A. Stewart)
Re: Windows 2000 sucks compared to linux (Andres Soolo)
Re: open source is getting worst with
Linux-Advocacy Digest #266, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 10:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Global Configuration tool (WAS: Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes (Jure Sah)
Re: Red hat becoming
Linux-Advocacy Digest #268, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 11:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Would Linux be invented if? (Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann?=)
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com ("Aaron R.
Linux-Advocacy Digest #269, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 14:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: auto run ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux can be made unstable, too. (Aaron Ginn)
Re: Question with Security on Linux/Unix versus Windows NT/2000 ("tony roth")
Re: auto run ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #270, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 15:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: The 2.4.0 kernel was released at 4pm pst. ("Bobby D. Bryant")
Re: Almost 60% Surveyed Plan To Install Windows 2000 ("Bobby D. Bryant")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Hugh O'Hare")
Linux-Advocacy Digest #272, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 16:13:07 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Big government and big business: why not
Linux-Advocacy Digest #271, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 16:13:07 EST
Contents:
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Linux can be made unstable, too. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Nobody wants Linux because
Linux-Advocacy Digest #275, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 18:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (Gary Hallock)
Re: Linux *has* the EDGE! ("kiwiunixman")
Re: Windows 2000 (T. Max Devlin)
Linux-Advocacy Digest #274, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 18:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: .NET and Microsoft Anti-Piracy (was: Re: The 2.4.0 kernel was released at 4pm
pst.) ("Adam Warner")
Re: Uptimes ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Microsoft hurts the
Linux-Advocacy Digest #277, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 19:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Why Hatred? (Form@C)
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Why
Linux-Advocacy Digest #276, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 19:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Windows 2000 ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (Gary Hallock)
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Uptimes ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: 2.4 finally made official
Linux-Advocacy Digest #278, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 20:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Microsoft tentacles squirm deeper into software hosting ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Windows fails again (Glitch)
Re: Windows fails again (J Sloan)
Re: Windows 2000 (Shane Phelps)
Re: Does Linux envy
Linux-Advocacy Digest #279, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 20:13:03 EST
Contents:
Linux is crude and inconsistant. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Question with Security on Linux/Unix versus Windows NT/2000 ("kiwiunixman")
Re: Question with Security on Linux/Unix versus Windows NT/2000
Linux-Advocacy Digest #284, Volume #31Fri, 5 Jan 01 23:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: .NET and Microsoft Anti-Piracy (was: Re: The 2.4.0 kernel was (Ian Pulsford)
Re: you dumb. and lazy. (PoD)
Re: auto run ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Another opinion
Linux-Advocacy Digest #286, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 00:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Would Linux be invented if? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Would Linux be invented if? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Would Linux be invented if? ("Aaron
Linux-Advocacy Digest #287, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 00:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Uptimes ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (Gary Hallock)
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Does
Linux-Advocacy Digest #288, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 01:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Windows 2000 ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Why Hatred? ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Red Hat dead/dying? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (Jason Bowen)
Re: Why NT? (JAR)
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #289, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 02:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Could only... (Jim Richardson)
Re: Microsoft is 20-years BEHIND other OS vendors (Jim Richardson)
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? (Jim Richardson)
Re: So how do we get from here to there? (Jim
29 matches
Mail list logo
