On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 05:30:08PM +0200, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
On 08/07/2011 11:24 PM, Renato wrote:
Hello, seq24 is affected by this bug:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/seq24/+bug/803385
basically with recent versions of jack, when jack transport is enabled,
seq24 doesn't start
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:07:33PM +0200, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 07/02/2011 11:50 AM, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 07/02/2011 11:28 AM, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 07/02/2011 11:06 AM, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 07/02/2011 12:52 AM, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
2011/7/1 rosea
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:51:38AM +0200, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Il 22/06/2011 20:28, torbenh ha scritto:
there is no -rt bug tracker. and its a bug in vanilla anyways.
However... This bugreport is completely useless, so i wont forward it to
the guy in charge.
WTF?
There was nothing
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:06:11PM +0200, Giuseppe Zompatori wrote:
cxirxcxxcxcxd#id#dddoxddxi#ddxd#cxddcdodxdxohddhhdd#dixyxykx#xďdyxdxxxdfdrddxd
Il giorno 19/apr/2011 12:08, Niccolò Belli darkbas...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Il 18/04/2011 14:41, Niccolò Belli ha
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:10:55PM +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:04:37PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
2. client3 loopbacks to itself and then it all applies as the bug.
question is: is it jack's bug? maybe not. the other half/part of the
problem still
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:34:47AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Dan Mills dmi...@exponent.myzen.co.uk wrote:
From your comments I take it that a patch to jack has been tried and
rejected?
it hasn't, and i was planning to cook one up since fons has finally
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:45:51PM +0100, Lieven Moors wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm not sure my program would satisfy the realtime constraint.
But I'll have a look at both options again...
using the sync callback to detect a skip in the transport is
not adequate usage of it.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:17:44PM +1100, Geoff Beasley wrote:
On 03/21/2011 12:04 AM, torbenh wrote:
hi...
we are about a week in the merge window, and linus merged the force
threaded irq handlers already. This means, that the most important
feature of the -rt patches is now in mainline
hi...
we are about a week in the merge window, and linus merged the force
threaded irq handlers already. This means, that the most important
feature of the -rt patches is now in mainline.
we sould start testing it during the rc cycle, i think.
(there will not be too many people turning force
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:15:30PM -0600, Duncan Gray wrote:
This is to bring a discussion from the Jack Dev list to this more
appropriate forum as suggested by Arnold Krille.
First, I hear lots of people seemingly thinking that AVB (IEEE 1722)
and the IEEE 1588 version of Precision Timing
sorry... i cced the old ML addresses :S
fixing the CC now.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 07:29:54PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 18:53 +0100, torbenh wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:47:53PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 13:24 +0100, torbenh wrote
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:40:01AM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:01 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/23 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com:
On 2/22/11, David Robillard wrote:
Before I totally forget about it... I think it might be a very
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:17:17AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:02:21AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
Well, I could pay or I could offer my time as a developer. During
the last five years I have
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:03:03AM +, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 02:58:56 -0500, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 12:33 +0900, michael noble wrote:
Speaking of existing work, I vaguely recall mention of a
plugin with a Qt
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:04:31PM +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:53:54PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us
I've been told than on OSX, when a process runs in realtime, it is only
allowed
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:16:09PM -0200, Bernardo Barros wrote:
If you look for number of projects and interaction, I think Github
would be better.
BitBucket works with mercurial, which is just as good as git, no worse
no better, allows you to have unlimited number of private and public
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:38:39PM -0700, Christopher Cherrett wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAU] [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com
To: Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
Cc: LAU Mail List
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:29:17PM +0100, Tom Szilagyi wrote:
2011/1/26 Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de:
since it's based on zita-convolver: did you also use the multi-threaded
partitioned convolution approach from jconvolver?
Hi Jörn,
I'm not sure about the
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:09:49AM +1100, cal wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with speed of traversal through a
boost multi index container? I'm pondering their use to manage notes
currently in play, eg indexed by midi channel ordered by midi event
time/frame stamp.
traversal should be
hi...
since jack1 release is taking pretty long, i decided to stop waiting
with a tschack release.
tschack is an SMP aware fork of jack1.
its a dropin replacement like jack2.
features:
- jack1 mlocking
- controlapi which works even when libjackserver.so is loaded RTLD_LOCAL
- smp aware
-
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 03:19:14PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 12/16/2010 08:49 PM, Lee Azzarello wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Lee Azzarello l...@rockingtiger.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:58 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:02:29AM
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:02:29AM +0100, Luis Garrido wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Lee Azzarello l...@rockingtiger.com wrote:
Hello, I'm looking for some advice for an interesting symptom of
putting my M-Audio Fast Track Pro USB sound card into ALSA multi mode.
I have no idea
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:59:37AM +0200, David Griffiths wrote:
Hi all,
I don't know if this is a known issue or something fixed in recent
kernels, but I recently found a fix for a problem I was having with my
harddisk spinning down in live performances, and then loading samples
from disk:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:31:13PM -0300, Camilo Polymeris wrote:
Hello all,
I was a Smartmusic (http://www.smartmusic.com) user until that program
stopped working with wine. For those of you who don't know it, it is a
program that basically downloads finale files (score + accompaniment)
from
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 04:07:22PM +, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
If you were at LAC in Parma, you'd have heard a 3-part strictly
invertible counterpoint fugue I wrote, used as
an example for some distortion synthesis instruments. Just a bit of fun.
right. and if joern would have been at lac,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 07:15:32AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
Robin Gareus wrote:
In layman terms:
There's a smart French guy by the name of Joseph F. sitting inside it:
If you play him some audio: He thinks: Hey, this is actually just a few
simple sine-waves added together
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:51:56PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Does anyone know of (or is there interest in creating) a library of
basic, low-level, audio mixing subroutines? This would be analag to
the BLAS[1], but for audio.
What I'm thinking is something like Ardour's
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:10:07AM +0200, rom wrote:
On 21/07/10 09:43, Arnold Krille wrote:
So please, if you create homepage for the app, state the problem and the
fact
that your (nice!) app is not a solution but only a patch to the problem...
:-D eheh, yes yes i will... i can
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 05:37:47PM +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 08:30:54AM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
Audio ADCs and DACs have three important inputs;
the signal input, the voltage reference, and the clock.
Noise and interference on the voltage reference
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:09:57PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:24:20AM +0200, torbenh wrote:
This IDE with all this syntax checking and refactoring tools (and I might
call
them bells and whistles sometimes..) produces a real added value.
That makes me
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:07:27PM +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 05/23/2010 10:22 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
[...]
... by which I don't mean to imply that I can't understand it
(although, with C++, there is always the possibility that I _think_ I
can understand it but am sadly
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:53:59PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Joshua D. Boyd jdb...@jdboyd.net wrote:
I think it isn't difficult to read because it is C++ or Boost. It is
difficult to read because it involves concepts like promises and futures,
which are
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:41 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
but i find the equivalen c++ easier to read.
assuming we have a proper modern c++ osc lib:
boost::unique_futureOscMsg
osc_recv (OscPeer peer, std::string path
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:12:22PM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 1:55 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
I find this sort of thing absolutely beyond comprehension.
It's impossible to understand without knowing the boost::
abstractions, templates and god knows what else.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:24:17AM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:58 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
well... for me, saying c++, is saying boost. boost and modern c++ is what
makes c++ better than java.
java is a pretty great language nowadays (with generics
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:41 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
but i find the equivalen c++ easier to read.
assuming we have a proper modern c++ osc lib:
boost::unique_futureOscMsg
osc_recv (OscPeer peer, std::string path
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03:20PM -0400, Joshua D. Boyd wrote:
On 05/23/10 16:22, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Chris Cannam
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:41 AM, torbenhtorb...@gmx.de wrote:
but i find the equivalent c++ easier to read.
assuming we have a proper modern
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:27:42PM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:18 PM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
classic C++ and modern c++ are two pairs of shoes.
if your afraid of writing templates. modern c++ is not for you.
I'm puzzled as to why templates should
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:28:14AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Chris Cannam
can...@all-day-breakfast.comwrote:
Reading a language is (for most projects) more important than writing
it. You yourself took the jackdmp code (in C++) and ported it back to
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:28:03PM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
dunno. but wikipedia calls this particular style modern c++
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_C%2B%2B_Design
Ah, I see. A neat trick, to give a still relatively
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 05/24/2010 01:47 PM, torbenh wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:36:43PM +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
But maybe that, with experience and methodology, one can get as
productive in C
as in C++? I suppose the guys
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:37:32PM +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 05/24/2010 08:47 PM, torbenh wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 05/24/2010 01:47 PM, torbenh wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:36:43PM +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 02:04:57AM +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 18:58 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
...
i am glad to hear, however, that you've never used longjmp/setjmp in your
code ,,
Ah! But this would otherwise have been the perfect cue for establishing
that
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42:13AM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:33 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
and i really find bigger programs pretty confusing in dynamic languages
where variables arent annotated with types.
That's just because the programmer wasn't
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Sunday 23 May 2010 04:38:53 Jeremy wrote:
Hmm, then it appears to not be a timeout issue. My entire system hung
within a few seconds with --timeout 100
I believe you can't really set that timeout greater then 5000.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:01:44PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42:13AM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:33 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:37:30AM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
hard realtime often precludes the use
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:37:30AM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
I agree with the Qt option, as it clearly produces some nice performant
music applications. But you're still programming in C++ which is tedious
because of memory management; also hard realtime often precludes the use
of Garbage
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:04:29PM +0200, lieven moors wrote:
On 05/20/2010 09:08 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier-6 wrote:
hi *!
in the light of recent timer discussions (was it here or on
jack-devel?), lwn.net has interesting coverage about the time stamp
counter and its oddities in the recent
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:46:16PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Niels Mayer nielsma...@gmail.com wrote:
I forgot to mention one of my main finds regarding clojure -- a nice Qt
interface, and working well w/ multithreaded...
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 01:51:20PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, torbenh wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:27:07AM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Does anyone out there have an opinion on linux kernel 2.6.31-rt vs.
2.6.33-rt for audio?
i am
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:21:06PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 08:31 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:16 AM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
It's pretty odd that you guys didn't discuss this clearly with each
other. It
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:21:12AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:06:28PM +0900, michael noble wrote:
hi folks,
Hi!
Are any interested or invested parties willing to provide some clarification
on this? I know distros are fully welcome to package whatever they
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:33:00AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
c) If you e.g. play the e string of a guitar at the 5th fret and then the a
string, while the guitar is normal e, a, d, g, b, e tuned.
this is not
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:03:07AM +0200, Andreas Degert wrote:
2010/3/29 torbenh torb...@gmx.de:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:33:12PM +0200, Andreas Degert wrote:
- --quit doesn't work (unknown dbus command)
yes. its not implemented yet.
- --quitas saves but doesn't quit
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:48:49AM +0200, rosea grammostola wrote:
torbenh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 07:55:46PM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:50 PM, rosea grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:54 PM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:35:02PM +0200, rosea grammostola wrote:
torbenh wrote:
Does it save and reload sessions / settings / songs of the applications?
thats what sessionmanagement is about. it will reproduce the saved state
as far as the apps support that.
So it support not only jack
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 07:55:46PM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:50 PM, rosea grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:54 PM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:41:35PM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:07:03PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:00:01 +0200, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
regarding app support:
already patched apps:
- jack-rack
- ghostess
- specimen
- guitarix
in queue:
- ardour
- fst
- seq24
i
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:31:10PM +1100, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On 03/28/2010 12:24 PM, Harry Van Haaren wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for the effort you've put into this. I havent even tried it
yet, (will do so
when I get some time), however as a Lin-Audio user, I really
appreciate
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:14:29PM +0200, hermann wrote:
guitarix is a simple Linux Rock Guitar amplifier and is designed
to achieve nice thrash/metal/rock/blues guitar sounds.
Guitarix uses the Jack Audio Connection Kit as its audio backend
and brings in one input and two output ports to
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:10:51PM +0100, Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from rosea grammostola's message of 2010-03-27 19:50:22 +0100:
jsweeper?
\r
I also wonder where it can be found.
svn co http://svn.fuzzle.org/jsweeper/trunk jsweeper
--
torben Hohn
hi...
jacksession stuff is merged into jack1 svn.
here is a rough explanation what needs to be done for apps to support
it: http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/Dev/JackSession
please let me know what is unclear.
--
torben Hohn
___
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 04:57:56PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I can only find CVS (which is truely horrible).
And the CVS version seems to be 0.7.1, while the last release was
0.7.2.
the diff between 0,7.2 and the cvs head is really small:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:18:13PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Jesse Chappell wrote:
I'm still around,
Oh, good!
but oh man, I've been neglecting freqtweak for
years. If distro maintainers ever notified me about anything I might
actually be prompted to spend the few hours
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:02:13PM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 08/03/2010, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
first of all its not tested. and it doesnt work.
thats only a problem with permissions though
after some chmod on /dev/shm/jack running jack_lsp as nobody works.
but the patch needs
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:43:53AM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
While I understand the fun of running jackd as root as a system service...
i am actually not talking about jackd running as root.
but any user who has access to it, can shoot it down.
On Monday 08 March 2010 03:06:08 torbenh
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject
I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for
linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues
disturbing me, when
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:58:54PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
hi alex, fons!
since you are dealing with artificial sources anyways, why stick to
first order? do your panning in higher order instead. the use of
resources is minimal (although it will create an insane amount of jack
ports,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:00:34AM -, James Morris wrote:
On Wed, February 24, 2010 23:15, Harry Van Haaren wrote:
1) MODEL:
jack_process callback - where midi data is output, timebase polled,
the model is a datastructure.
its the sequence or data that is your document.
2) VIEW:
the
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:22:38PM +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
To all, for your information.
I have received the following message from Mr. Nick Copeland.
It was sent privately, but since this is the continuation of
a thread on this list and the person concerned has well gone
beyond
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:13:33AM +0100, Nick Copeland wrote:
Hi Fons,
Both of these are your quotes from your last two email. These might
have been directly to me however you chose to take it on to the list:
BTW, the code I referred to is a set of plugins, it is not part of AMS.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 02:42:36PM +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:05:02PM +0300, alex stone wrote:
An obvious question i guess, but is 1/16 a fine enough resolution for
a wide selection of use cases?
I don't know about any 'human interfaces' (faders, knobs,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:48:24PM +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 03:51:22AM +0100, torbenh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 06:09:42PM +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
We may not be talking of the same thing. This is not about
'generic events' but about reduced
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:30:42AM +0100, Julien 'Lta' BALLET wrote:
Hello,
That's true, this isn't new at all. but it has been lost for some
times in the audio world in favor of midi, mainly afaik because too
much cables just drives people crazy :)
But actually, implementing it perfectly
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:18:54PM +0300, alex stone wrote:
I will clarify here that i'm talking about a user experience, before
the discussion gets into jousting with white papers.
:)
hmm... i guess this was some thread hijack.
anyways. my papers are generally brown, because i spilled
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:18:54PM +0300, alex stone wrote:
I will clarify here that i'm talking about a user experience, before
the discussion gets into jousting with white papers.
ok. so you basically say that midi channels are annoying ?
how about several CC controllers flowing through
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 06:09:42PM +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:43:07AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:32 AM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
A reduced sample rate means less bandwidth. It doesn't mean
that controls can't be 'sample
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:03:04AM +0100, gerald mwangi wrote:
I didn't consider this point, and its truly one to think about. But
since major projects also use sndfile and mad (like ardour uses
sndfile), and the use of them simplifies the code, I still favour them
over using external apps.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:01:38PM -0500, David McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 PM, David Olofson da...@olofson.net wrote:
Now, in real life, the every time part will never be quite accurate.
After
all, you may see some once in a billion combination of hardware events
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:38:53PM +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a feature freeze,
i added some features.
- smp aware
- clickless connections
Is there any reason why a user
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:38:38AM -0800, James Warden wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Chris Cannam can...@all-day-breakfast.com wrote:
From: Chris Cannam can...@all-day-breakfast.com
Subject: Re: [LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1
To: torbenh torb...@gmx.de
Cc: linux
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:01:53PM +0100, hollunder wrote:
Excerpts from torbenh's message of Sun Jan 24 22:05:49 +0100 2010:
hi...
since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a feature freeze,
i added some features.
- smp aware
- clickless connections
these changes are
hi...
since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a feature freeze,
i added some features.
- smp aware
- clickless connections
these changes are too radical to be included in mainline jack1.
so it gets a new name.
its approaching beta status now. dunno... maybe someone is motivated to
test
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:01:36PM +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 01/20/2010 08:24 PM, Harry Van Haaren wrote:
Thanks for the JackMidi crash course. That's definatly some food for
thought.
I've tried to get the JACK Midi things working before, but I've never
managed.
I see the
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 07:48:20AM -0500, Paul Coccoli wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:37 AM, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
well.. the real problems are a bit deeper.
and not really touched be any example clients.
you need to have lockfree access to the note sequence.
while still being
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:49:21AM +0100, Stéphane Letz wrote:
Le 15 janv. 2010 à 10:03, torbenh a écrit :
hi...
i am working on a c++0x DSP library.
variadic templates prove to be a nice way to handle
the massive function inlining required to build efficient samplebased
hi...
i am working on a c++0x DSP library.
variadic templates prove to be a nice way to handle
the massive function inlining required to build efficient samplebased
processing graphs.
the idioms i am currently using for the containers require gcc-4.5
though, so this is still a bit of a
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:08:48AM +, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
Dear all,
Torben's new project brought back to my mind this mind-bending
C++ template example (see attached), which I could not yet get to
compile, I have been told it has been compiled, but g++ will have
none of it. So I
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:08:48AM +, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
Dear all,
Torben's new project brought back to my mind this mind-bending
C++ template example (see attached), which I could not yet get to
compile, I have been told it has been compiled, but g++ will have
none of it. So I
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:05:01PM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
Aside from that, we have to forget about everything that has anything
to do with GTK+. None of what you look forward to is even remotely
possible with the examples and advice given so far (I mean just one
look at libphat is..urghhh
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
aseqmm is a C++ wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface using Qt4
objects, idioms and style. ALSA sequencer provides software support for MIDI
technology on Linux. Several examples are included in the source
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:50:40AM +0100, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Thus telling the compiler that `this` is not an alias when
process() is called.
On second thought... since those didn't work for me, perhaps part of
the problem is that osc_block is a global variable, and thus there's
no
hi...
i discovered yesterday, that gcc cant optimize something like:
---
class Ramp
{
private:
float _phase;
float _omega;
public:
Ramp();
float process()
{
_phase +=
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:55:08PM +0100, torbenh wrote:
hi...
i discovered yesterday, that gcc cant optimize something like:
---
class Ramp
{
private:
float _phase;
float _omega;
public
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:11:23PM -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Thus telling the compiler that `this` is not an alias when
process() is called.
On second thought... since those didn't work for me, perhaps part of
the problem
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:23:54AM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4.
Inter-host and headless session management is important to
me, too.
I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-)
@Fons, thanks
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:11:04PM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
torbenh wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:23:54AM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
What can we expect from group 2? Maybe some of the lash developers
belongs in this group?
Dave, Juuso, Bob Ham, ... ? What are your plans
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 06:45:42PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:15:19PM -0500, Mark Vitek wrote:
Hello all,
Hi!
I'm currently writing an arpeggiator that syncs to JACK tempo. It's
starting to get usable, and I'm running out of excuses not to let
others try
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:15:08PM +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:32:12PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 11:09:18 f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
non-RT, while these extra threads remain at RT. So
they will pre-empts Jack's thread
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:22:20PM +1100, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
--
Firmware/Software
--
The device will run Linux OS.
Audio data transfer will be via netjack using CELT compression.
heh ? you dont want lossy compression for a soundcard.
if
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
