On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:38:38AM -0800, James Warden wrote: > > > --- On Tue, 1/26/10, Chris Cannam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Chris Cannam <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1 > > To: "torbenh" <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 7:38 AM > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM, > > torbenh <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a > > feature freeze, > > > i added some features. > > > > > > - smp aware > > > - clickless connections > > > > Is there any reason why a user would prefer this over > > jack2? > > > > and would I assume correctly that one of the reasons to not let the jack1 > codebase "die" (or freeze) is that it is written in C as opposed to jack2 ?
no. i actually prefer C++ but not that much that i would deal with CamelCase and a class hierarchy i find confusing. but thats just my taste. -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
