On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Brett McCoy idragos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 AM, alex stone compos...@gmail.com wrote:
We hope you enjoy using OOM2, and should you have anything you'd like
to report, please send an email to:
developm...@openoctave.org
We can also
Hi just downloaded and built oom2, all went well. It runs fine. But is
there any way to set the install libdir ? I have a 64 bit system with
32 bit libs in /usr/lib which is where oom2 installs its files. A
fairly minor niggle I know but if there is a quick fix I would be
grateful. I did some
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 AM, alex stone compos...@gmail.com wrote:
Deep in the basement of the OpenOctaveProject, the team have been
working hard, to bring OpenOctaveMidi into the modern age. From the
new interface, to the workflow features, OOM2 is the result of a great
deal of hard work,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:29:17PM +0100, Tom Szilagyi wrote:
2011/1/26 Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de:
since it's based on zita-convolver: did you also use the multi-threaded
partitioned convolution approach from jconvolver?
Hi Jörn,
I'm not sure about the
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Christopher Cherrett
ccherr...@openoctave.org wrote:
It is no secret that it was muse2. They suggested we fork. We wanted to stay
with them.
Neither Muse nor Muse2 are mentioned anywhere on your website. I asked
only that you acknowledge the project that you
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
To: Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
Cc: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 09:32 AM
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 AM, alex stone compos...@gmail.com wrote:
Deep in the basement of the OpenOctaveProject, the team have been
working hard, to bring OpenOctaveMidi into the modern age. From the
new
On January 27, 2011 11:08:30 am Paul Davis wrote:
...
while i admire what you are trying to do with OOM/OOM2, the forking of
an existing, well-known project, without any attribution whatsoever,
or even acknowledgement of the fork, is troubling to say the least.
It is not troubling at all. And
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:46 AM, alex stone compos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 AM, alex stone compos...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
good grief!
i never said you were bad people. i have a lot
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Raymond Martin lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On January 27, 2011 11:08:30 am Paul Davis wrote:
...
while i admire what you are trying to do with OOM/OOM2, the forking of
an existing, well-known project, without any attribution whatsoever,
or even acknowledgement
On 27 January 2011 16:37, Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org wrote:
OK, it was muse2.
Did you ever consider, for example, _not_ assigning yourselves the
copyright in the program's About box?
This is exactly what happened with Rosegarden for OOM1 -- fork the
project, provide a new
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
To: alex stone compos...@gmail.com
Cc: LAU Mail List linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org, Linux Audio
Developers Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date:
Alex,
clearly mentioning the project you forked is just good manners of the
kind that should be expected among civilized people.
Your overreaction to Paul's mail is one hell of an ugly sight.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:55 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/10/2011 12:22 AM, David Adler wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
[ ... jack_snapshot ... ]
i emailed tapas about this a few months ago, asking if we could host
it on jackaudio.org and got no reply. if
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:59 PM, mickski56 micksk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi just downloaded and built oom2, all went well. It runs fine. But is
there any way to set the install libdir ? I have a 64 bit system with
32 bit libs in /usr/lib which is where oom2 installs its files. A
fairly minor
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:51:26 Raymond Martin wrote:
On January 27, 2011 11:08:30 am Paul Davis wrote:
...
while i admire what you are trying to do with OOM/OOM2, the forking of
an existing, well-known project, without any attribution whatsoever,
or even acknowledgement of the fork,
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAU] [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com
To: Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
Cc: LAU Mail List linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org, Linux Audio
Developers
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 12:35 PM
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:51:26 Raymond Martin wrote:
On January 27, 2011 11:08:30 am Paul
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Christopher Cherrett
ccherr...@openoctave.org wrote:
I suspect there is much more to this puzzle than attribution. I suspect we
rocked the boat just a bit too much and too fast.
No, there really isn't.(At least not in as far as the original post
that started
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Thomas Vecchione seabla...@gmail.com
To: Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
Cc: Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com, LAU Mail List
linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org, Linux Audio
Hi everybody, I'm new to the list. Wassup :)
I have a question regarding liblv2-gui. On the site
(http://ll-plugins.nongnu.org/liblv2-gui.html) there are warnings all over the
place about how the lib is not compatible with rev 3+ of LV2. I searched the
archives of this list and Google, but to
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Cherrett
ccherr...@openoctave.org wrote:
Seems a bit more than a question, seems there is a few insinuations.
Not really. There is the statement that not attributing is not
morally correct, and as I said some people do disagree with the choice
to
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
were forked
This is not about what is going in in this thread in any direct way. (Or may
not be at least, I do not know enough to say I guess.)
What if I fork a project
Stop forking around
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:57 PM, drew Roberts z...@100jamz.com wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
were forked
This is not about what is going in in this thread in any
the fact that you forked Muse and not LMMS, for example, makes OOM2 look much
more
interesting than it could have been otherwise.
Well it was really simple to choose muse. They had the best midi tools
to use hands down.
I just happen to be a graphic artist and could make it look nice for my
On Thursday 27 January 2011 20:57:22 drew Roberts wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
were forked
This is not about what is going in in this thread in any direct way. (Or
may not be at least, I
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?
From: Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 01:15 PM
But there is something morally wrong when you tell your users that you used
another project as starting
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Cherrett
ccherr...@openoctave.org wrote:
Seems a bit more than a question, seems there is a few insinuations.
whatever insinuations are there are entirely your own imagination at
work. to repeat: i think (and said) that its (quite deeply) wrong to
On 27 January 2011 19:38, Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org wrote:
I suspect there is much more to this puzzle than attribution.
No, really not. Attribution is incredibly important to many open
source developers, partly because there are so few tangible benefits
involved with open
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:57 PM, drew Roberts z...@100jamz.com wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
were forked
The only instance I can think of is how Cinepaint (aka Film-Gimp) was
forked off from
this thread was always going to happenyou said yourself on IRC Chris
Cherrit that you're a difficult guy to get along with; and seems you
were right.
I don't give a fuck how good you think you are or your team is or your
professional team is, or how tired you all are, or how many nice
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Brett McCoy idragos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:57 PM, drew Roberts z...@100jamz.com wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
were forked
The only
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAU] [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Chris Cannam can...@all-day-breakfast.com
To: Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
Cc: Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com, LAU Mail List
linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org, Linux
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?
From: Geoff Beasley ge...@laughingboyrecords.com
To: Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
Cc: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 01:32 PM
this thread was always going to happenyou
On 01/28/2011 07:51 AM, Christopher Cherrett wrote:
I understand why you are so resistant against our professional team.
hahaha
my last comment to you and one this matter...
fork off.
g.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?
From: Geoff Beasley ge...@laughingboyrecords.com
To: Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
Cc: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 01:47 PM
On 01/28/2011 07:51 AM, Christopher Cherrett
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 03:43:40 pm Chris Cannam did opine:
On 27 January 2011 19:38, Christopher Cherrett ccherr...@openoctave.org
wrote:
I suspect there is much more to this puzzle than attribution.
No, really not. Attribution is incredibly important to many open
source
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 01:57 PM
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 03:43:40 pm Chris Cannam did opine:
On 27 January 2011 19:38,
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 04:02:20 pm Christopher Cherrett did opine:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 01:57 PM
On Thursday,
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 02:07 PM
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 04:02:20 pm Christopher Cherrett did opine:
Original
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 04:23:53 pm Christopher Cherrett did opine:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 02:07 PM
On Thursday,
Could the community please review the attribution so we may continue
with our journey? This attribution appears on the website, github,
README and anywhere else you guys need to see it.
OOM2 is developed from the base code of MusE (Muse Sequencer) written by
the mighty Werner Schweer, and
Hello all1
I haven't followed the complete discussion, only seen bits of it. But what
is so fundamentally wrong with that attribution? Maybe a little short and
informal and I don't understand the P.S., but don't explain, I'm sure I can
read it for myself, if I'm willing to without waisting
On 1/27/11, Christopher Cherrett wrote:
We are not like Ardour asking for money all the time.
So much for groin-level kicks. You were approached in a civilized way.
Paying back with something like this is really low style.
I suspect there is much more to this puzzle than attribution. I
On 1/27/11, Brett McCoy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:57 PM, drew Roberts wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
were forked
The only instance I can think of is how Cinepaint (aka Film-Gimp) was
I've followed this conversation from the beginning
I'm usually very quiet just reading all the emails from LAU LAD with
a very few answers (just because my knowledge from a user and from dev
point of view is limited)
I do understand the message but i think it needs another PS:
Sarcasm
46 matches
Mail list logo
