On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:44:10PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Francis,
Well, all in all, you get the idea, and I'm probably not the guy
to craft questions for such a survey. But having input from as
large a panel of users as possible would be a nice thing to have.
Your
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:00, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Something like SurveyMonkey (http://www.surveymonkey.com) or
SurveyGizmo (http://www.surveygizmo.com) or similar would be better,
as it does all the reporting for you, builds the nice survey interface
with checkboxes,
I got namespace.pl working again, and it showed the following
routines could be declared static.
fs/btrfs/ctree
btrfs_clear_path_blocking
btrfs_insert_some_items
btrfs_prev_leaf
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref
btrfs_delayed_ref_pending
fs/btrfs/dir-item
btrfs_match_dir_item_name
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Francis Galiegue wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:00, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Something like SurveyMonkey (http://www.surveymonkey.com) or
SurveyGizmo (http://www.surveygizmo.com) or similar would be better,
as it does all
Martin Walter, Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:46:05 +0200:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Francis Galiegue wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:00, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Something like SurveyMonkey (http://www.surveymonkey.com) or
SurveyGizmo
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 00:31, Francis Galiegue fgalie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
At this point in time, btrfs has gained a lot of interest, and not
only a passing one. So, it is, imho, the ideal time to build up a
survey to monitor how btrfs is used today (or _was_ used - I have
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:35, Benjamin Griese der.dar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Francis,
have you posted the URL yet?
I can't see it, does anybody else can see the link? :)
Thanks.
Gah. User error...
http://appv3.sgizmo.com/testsurvey/survey?id=376617crc=98980edfce58a795c966488276754ddb
--
On 28/09/10 15:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
Here is a preview of the survey.
I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't fit on a
screen :), but I think I have chosen the most important ones.
Please comment!
Click on the following link to test this survey:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:57, David Pottage da...@electric-spoon.com wrote:
On 28/09/10 15:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
Here is a preview of the survey.
I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't fit
on a screen :), but I think I have chosen the most important
On 9/27/10 23:58 , Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:44:10PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Francis,
Well, all in all, you get the idea, and I'm probably not the guy
to craft questions for such a survey. But having input from as
large a panel of users as possible
So far, very nice. Some comments inline below.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Francis Galiegue fgalie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:57, David Pottage da...@electric-spoon.com wrote:
On 28/09/10 15:27, Francis Galiegue wrote:
Here is a preview of the survey.
I have not
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 19:48, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
So far, very nice. Some comments inline below.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Francis Galiegue fgalie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:57, David Pottage da...@electric-spoon.com
wrote:
On 28/09/10 15:27,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:27, Francis Galiegue fgalie...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a preview of the survey.
I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't fit on
a screen :), but I think I have chosen the most important ones.
Please comment!
Click on the following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.09.2010 21:00, Francis Galiegue wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 16:27, Francis Galiegue fgalie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here is a preview of the survey.
I have not included *all* feature requests yet, otherwise it wouldn't
fit on a screen :),
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 21:18, Andreas Philipp
philipp.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
In the question about the features one is using day by day on the last
page Multiple device (RAID) is listed twice.
Noticed, and fixed that. It's a bug with surveygizmo, in fact.
Everything else looks really
Question 16 needs an other option, or some elaboration (I've had
things fixed via tool patches from developers).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 21:27, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
Question 16 needs an other option, or some elaboration (I've had
things fixed via tool patches from developers).
Yes, I thought about this and forgot to add this answer. Fixed!
--
Francis Galiegue, fgalie...@gmail.com
It seems
This was a request from the systemd guys. They need a quick and easy way to get
all devices attached to a Btrfs filesystem in order to check if any of the disks
are SSD for...something, I didn't ask :). I've tested this with the
btrfs-progs patch that accompanies this patch. Thanks,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:27:57AM -0400, Francis Galiegue wrote:
Here is a preview of the survey.
Very nice.
Question #2 might benefit from a I only use btrfs for testing purposes
might be useful. Possibly even with a comment?
- Kristian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Josef,
what about using your ioctl to exporting also other info ? For example devid,
size, bytes, uuid ...
I know that btrfs filesystem-show does the same, but it reads the partition
(the disk) instead of query the filesystem. That means:
- It work even for unmounted filesystem (which is
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:53:16PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
This was a request from the systemd guys. They need a quick and easy way to
get
all devices attached to a Btrfs filesystem in order to check if any of the
disks
are SSD for...something, I didn't ask :). I've tested this with
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:25:13PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:53:16PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
This was a request from the systemd guys. They need a quick and easy way
to get
all devices attached to a Btrfs filesystem in order to check if any of the
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:28:51AM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Josef,
what about using your ioctl to exporting also other info ? For example devid,
size, bytes, uuid ...
I know that btrfs filesystem-show does the same, but it reads the partition
(the disk) instead of query the
On Tue, 28.09.10 20:08, Josef Bacik (jo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:25:13PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:53:16PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
This was a request from the systemd guys. They need a quick and easy way
to get
all devices
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:48:15AM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Josef,
please, if you add or change a command pay attention to update the man page
too (man/btrfs.8.in).
Hrm I missed that with git add, I'll fix that up.
See my comments below
On Tuesday, 28 September, 2010,
On Wednesday, 29 September, 2010, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:48:15AM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Josef,
please, if you add or change a command pay attention to update the man
page
too (man/btrfs.8.in).
Hrm I missed that with git add, I'll fix that up.
26 matches
Mail list logo