Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2018-03-27 Thread Filipe Manana
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:23 PM, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 07:49:02AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> > Merging plan for this patchset from last week was to postpone until >> > 4.18 due to lack of final testing here. I've tried to run this with >> > quotas enabled

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2018-03-27 Thread David Sterba
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 07:49:02AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > Merging plan for this patchset from last week was to postpone until > > 4.18 due to lack of final testing here. I've tried to run this with > > quotas enabled an fstests that led to warnings in the power failure > > simulation tests. >

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2018-03-26 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2018年03月26日 22:10, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 08:55:21AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> On 2017年12月13日 05:12, David Sterba wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:34:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: The patch is consist of 2 main parts: 1) Type based qgroup reservation

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2018-03-26 Thread David Sterba
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 08:55:21AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > On 2017年12月13日 05:12, David Sterba wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:34:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > >> The patch is consist of 2 main parts: > >> 1) Type based qgroup reservation > >>The original patchset is sent several

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2017-12-12 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2017年12月13日 02:01, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 12.12.2017 09:34, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> [Overall] >>> The previous rework on qgroup reservation system put a lot of effort on >>> data, which works quite fine. >>> >>> But it

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2017-12-12 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2017年12月13日 05:12, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:34:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> The patch is consist of 2 main parts: >> 1) Type based qgroup reservation >>The original patchset is sent several months ago. >>Nothing is modified at all, just rebased. And not

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2017-12-12 Thread David Sterba
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:34:22PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > The patch is consist of 2 main parts: > 1) Type based qgroup reservation >The original patchset is sent several months ago. >Nothing is modified at all, just rebased. And not conflict at all. > >It's from patch 1 to patch 6.

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2017-12-12 Thread David Sterba
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 12.12.2017 09:34, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > [Overall] > > The previous rework on qgroup reservation system put a lot of effort on > > data, which works quite fine. > > > > But it takes less focus on metadata reservation,

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2017-12-12 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 12.12.2017 09:34, Qu Wenruo wrote: > [Overall] > The previous rework on qgroup reservation system put a lot of effort on > data, which works quite fine. > > But it takes less focus on metadata reservation, causing some problem > like metadata reservation underflow and noisy kernel warning. >

[PATCH 00/14] Qgroup metadata reservation rework

2017-12-11 Thread Qu Wenruo
[Overall] The previous rework on qgroup reservation system put a lot of effort on data, which works quite fine. But it takes less focus on metadata reservation, causing some problem like metadata reservation underflow and noisy kernel warning. This patchset will try to address the remaining