On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:48:51PM -0700, Gautam Singaraju ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Is there any attempts being made to provide software based RSA
cryptographic support in kernel level? I see that 2.6.21 supports
Hardware devices such as VIA Padlock ACE. Has anybody had a change to
use such
From: Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:37:31 +0400
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:48:51PM -0700, Gautam Singaraju ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there any attempts being made to provide software based RSA
cryptographic support in kernel level? I see that 2.6.21
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 04:05:33AM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
From: Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:37:31 +0400
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:48:51PM -0700, Gautam Singaraju ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there any attempts being made to
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VIA padlock engine or RSA? The former is heavily used in the wild, but
why would anyone want to use RSA in the kernel?
Automatic SSL done in-kernel on user data for socket I/O, with
hardware offload from the crypto layer when available.
AFAIK
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:12:52PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
So far the only proposed user for RSA in-kernel seems to be module
signing and I'm staying well away from that debate :)
eCryptfs uses RSA.
Right now it has to defer to a userspace daemon to perform the
operation.
Mike
I am considering RSA as an option for research purposes; though I need
it only for decryption purposes. Any specific reason for running the
daemon in user space?
Gautam
On 7/6/07, Michael Halcrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:12:52PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
So far the
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:36:37AM -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote:
eCryptfs uses RSA.
Right now it has to defer to a userspace daemon to perform the
operation.
OK that'd be the most convincing case for me then.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu