On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Thanks, applied. This will be on the for_stable that I will be
> sending to Linus sometime during 4.12-rcX.
I think you might have just missed the kbuild test robot complaining
about an incorrect compiler warning, when using
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 07:47:52PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> It's possible that get_random_{u32,u64} is used before the crng has
> initialized, in which case, its output might not be cryptographically
> secure. For this problem, directly, this patch set is introducing the
> *_wait variety
It's possible that get_random_{u32,u64} is used before the crng has
initialized, in which case, its output might not be cryptographically
secure. For this problem, directly, this patch set is introducing the
*_wait variety of functions, but even with that, there's a subtle issue:
what happens to