: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21and
pseudo-authorities
Uwe Bugla wrote:
1. You utmost personally are responsible for 4 ununsable kernels, as far
as bt8xx cards are concerned: 2.6.13, 2.6.14, 2.6.15, 2.6.16!
2. You did not even want to imply to resolve that issue by incarnating
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Betreff:
: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Uwe Bugla:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-dvb
,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21
and pseudo-authorities
Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Uwe Bugla:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED
: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
On 4/30/07, Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:58:33 +0200
Von: hermann pitton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Linus
],
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
On 4/30/07, Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:58:33 +0200
Von: hermann pitton [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
On 4/30/07, Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original-Nachricht
]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Uwe Bugla wrote:
So please Linus - rip that crap out of 2.6.21-git2. And if you do see
questions what parts you need to rip out, please feel free to ask me
Uwe. I'll say
Uwe Bugla wrote:
And I swear that this dvb-pll.c is completely obsolete for this scenario!
For that reason (old variant):
# CONFIG_DVB_TUNER_LGH06XF is not set
And this old variant was NOT done by Trent Piepho, it was NOT done by Andrew
Quincey,
but it was produced by Michael Krufky
Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
Uwe Bugla wrote:
And I swear that this dvb-pll.c is completely obsolete for this
scenario!
For that reason (old variant):
# CONFIG_DVB_TUNER_LGH06XF is not set
And this old
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0100 (BST)
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points
-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
Uwe, you just made my kill-list.
I've not actually done that in _years_. So you can feel proud. Your emails
will get automatically filtered to their own (ignored) folder. I told you
why, and you didn't seem
: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:47 +0200
Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not manage to at least find one single unresolved module during
compilation, and I have been working with this almost fantastic solution with
several
On 4/30/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 30 2007 19:25, Uwe Bugla wrote:
THIS PATCH IS DONE TO AVOID RAM WASTE FOR CASES IN WHICH IT IS PROVEN THAT
DST
AND DST_CA ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL
[...]
How much on the Theo-meter are we yet?
it's enough, I told him that I'll
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Anyway, I'll get out of the discussion. There's clearly some personality
issues in the DVB area, and I don't know quite _why_ that is, but Uwe,
you're definitely not helping.
There isn't a problem here, just a lot of noise coming from one source. I
Trent Piepho wrote:
The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the dvb
helper module customization system. So nobody needs to worry about this
anymore, the last two patches in this repository will fix it correctly.
With regards to the dst, i have explained earlier to
: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Anyway, I'll get out of the discussion. There's clearly some personality
issues in the DVB area, and I don't know quite _why_ that is, but Uwe,
you're definitely
On 5/1/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the
dvb
helper module customization system. So nobody needs to worry about this
anymore, the last two patches in this repository will fix it correctly.
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Anyway, I'll get out of the discussion. There's clearly some personality
issues in the DVB area
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21and
pseudo-authorities
Trent Piepho wrote:
The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the
dvb
helper module customization system. So nobody needs to worry about
Uwe Bugla wrote:
1. You utmost personally are responsible for 4 ununsable kernels, as far as
bt8xx cards are concerned: 2.6.13, 2.6.14, 2.6.15, 2.6.16!
2. You did not even want to imply to resolve that issue by incarnating that
community and synergy principle that linux community needs to
Manu, also for you please stop it, we know that Uwe writes abusive
stuff but you don't have to go on with it.
It's about the patch Trent wrote if you're not able to discuss it wait
for others to comment it.
I only saw subjective reasons why you are against it, but the actual
patch doesn't cross
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Betreff: Re: Critical points about kernel
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Critical points about kernel
Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Uwe Bugla:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
25 matches
Mail list logo
