Re: [PATCH] printk-formats.txt documentation update

2011-02-06 Thread Andrew Murray
Thanks for the feedback - I will truncate to 80 characters and implement Joe's advice. Thanks, Andrew Murray On 6 February 2011 00:37, Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 00:15 +, Andrew Murray wrote: From: Andrew Murray amur...@mpc-data.co.uk This patch updates the

[PATCH] Kconfig: XIP doesn't depend on block

2011-02-06 Thread Marco Stornelli
From: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com XIP doesn't depend on block symbol, then we can reorder the Kconfig. For ext2 doesn't change the Kconfig behavior but if other fs will use FS_XIP it won't need to include block support if not needed. Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli

Re: [PATCH] printk-formats.txt documentation update

2011-02-06 Thread Andrew Murray
On 6 February 2011 10:16, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote: In the mean time, we also got %pV and %pK. Can you please add them as well? Thx! Ok how about this revised patch? From: Andrew Murray amur...@mpc-data.co.uk This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the

Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: XIP doesn't depend on block

2011-02-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:15:00 +0100 Marco Stornelli wrote: From: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com XIP doesn't depend on block symbol, then we can reorder the Kconfig. For ext2 doesn't change the Kconfig behavior but if other fs will use FS_XIP it won't need to include block support

Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: XIP doesn't depend on block

2011-02-06 Thread Marco Stornelli
2011/2/6 Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net: On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:15:00 +0100 Marco Stornelli wrote: From: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com XIP doesn't depend on block symbol, then we can reorder the Kconfig. For ext2 doesn't change the Kconfig behavior but if other fs will use