Re: Dump Management

2008-07-01 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
a custom fault signal handler does :-) Cheers, Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker Codefidence Ltd. The code is free, your time isn't.(TM) Web:http://codefidence.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: +972-8-9316883 ext. 201 Fax:+972-8-9316885 Mobile: +972-52-8260388 Q

Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel

2008-07-01 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Tim Bird wrote: Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: Tim Bird wrote: I agree. When you say have the application call modprobe directly, I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I simply meant that you can fork and exec modprobe itself (or use system() but that would require a working

Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel

2008-06-22 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Tim Bird wrote: Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: Well, seeing as both modprobe and a minimal shell are part of busybox which is included in over 90%+ of Linux based embedded systems and that the script is trivial, not to mention that you can just have the application call modprobe directly, just

Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel

2008-06-18 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
them in a an in kernel initramfs if you want to keep them attached to the kernel binary for ease of maintenance) and simply call a script that calls modprobe when it's OK to load them? Sounds a hell of lot simpler to me... Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker Codefidence Ltd