On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:24:04PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * FILE NAME fs/pramfs/namei.c
FILE NAME != namei.c
Yes, that's why you should never do such filename comments which are not
only utterly prone to be out of data, but also 100% useless.
--
To unsubscribe
2010/10/10 Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:37:49 +0200 Marco Stornelli wrote:
Above 2 lines need to indented more.
Ack.
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Attempt an unprotected clear of checksum information in the
+ * superblock, this
On 10/10/2010 17:37, Marco Stornelli wrote:
From: Marco Stornellimarco.storne...@gmail.com
Test module.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornellimarco.storne...@gmail.com
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
---
From: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com
Test module.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
--- linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:37:49 +0200 Marco Stornelli wrote:
From: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com
Test module.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
linux-2.6.36/fs/pramfs/pramfs_test.c
---
