RE: [OT, JOB] Xilinx, San Jose: 2 full-time openings for embedded systems/embedded software group

2014-06-19 Thread Bird, Tim
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:33 PM, Wojciech Koszek wrote: Hello, [This isn't strictly Linux-related, I know, I know. But I assumed some of you may like embedded systems. We're the same group as guys who did Linux for Xilinx FPGA SoC (Zynq). We also use a lot of Open-Source stuff and

RE: Why is the deferred initcall patch not mainline?

2014-10-18 Thread Bird, Tim
The answer is pretty easy, I think. I tried to mainline it once but failed, and didn't really try again. If it is being found useful, we should try to mainline it again, this time with more persistence. The reason it got rejected before IIRC was that you can accomplish a similar thing with

Re: Why is the deferred initcall patch not mainline?

2014-10-18 Thread Bird, Tim
Alexandre Belloni wrote Hi, On 18/10/2014 at 10:11:27 +0200, Bird, Tim wrote : The answer is pretty easy, I think. I tried to mainline it once but failed, and didn't really try again. If it is being found useful, we should try to mainline it again, this time with more

RE: Why is the deferred initcall patch not mainline?

2014-10-21 Thread Bird, Tim
I'm going to respond to several comments in this one message (sorry for the likely confusion) On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:31 AM, Nicolas Pitre [n...@fluxnic.net] wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Grant Likely wrote: On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Bird, Tim tim.b...@sonymobile.com wrote

RE: Why is the deferred initcall patch not mainline?

2014-10-23 Thread Bird, Tim
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 8:49 AM, Nicolas Pitre [n...@fluxnic.net] wrote: On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Rob Landley wrote: On 10/21/14 14:58, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote: I'm going to respond to several comments in this one message (sorry for the likely

RE: Why is the deferred initcall patch not mainline?

2014-10-23 Thread Bird, Tim
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:05 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Alexandre Belloni wrote: On 23/10/2014 at 13:56:44 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote : On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Bird, Tim wrote: I'm not sure why this attention to reading the status. The salient feature