Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:33:26PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:28:26AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
That's bad :-) So there is no room for improvement any more in our
ARM
Is the LinuxCon Europe October 26 - 28, 2011, Prague
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-europe
now the same as the Embedded Linux Conference Europe (ELCE) 2011?
There is some rumor that these were merged. But the above page doesn't
even mention the string 'embedded'.
Thanks
Tested-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
On an embedded ARM system insmoding a large number of modules the
overall module load time is improved up to ~1s. Great! :)
It would be nice to get these patches into mainline asap.
Many thanks
Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 17.05.2011 22:56, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
This work was supported by a hardware donation from the CE Linux Forum.
Signed-off-by: Alessio Igor Boganiabog...@kernel.org
---
kernel/module.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c
With the previous patch mmc: block: mmcblkN: use slot index instead of
dynamic name index name_idx is not needed any more.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@de.bosch.com
CC: Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org
CC: Chris Ball c...@laptop.org
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 16
Hi,
on a ARMv7 Freescale i.MX6 based system we are looking at optimizing the
kernel boot time. Booting a 3.5.7 kernel with SMP=y and the kernel
option 'nosmp' (the i.MX6 has single, dual and quad CPU versions) we get
[0.255927] hw perfevents: enabled with ARMv7 Cortex-A9 PMU driver, 7
Hi,
regarding boot time optimization, on an embedded ARM Cortex-A9 based
system with 512MB or 1GB main memory, we found that initializing this
main memory takes a somehow large amount of time.
Initializing 512MB takes = ~100ms, the additional 512MB on the 1GB
take = ~100ms additionally,
Hi,
During the ELCE 2014 in Duesseldorf in Chris Hallinan's talk [1] there
has been the unanswered question why the deferred initcall patch [2]
isn't mainline, yet.
Anybody remembers?
Best regards
Dirk
[1] http://sched.co/1yG5fmY
[2] http://elinux.org/Deferred_Initcalls
--
To
of
this discussion ;)
Dirk Behme wrote
Hi,
During the ELCE 2014 in Duesseldorf in Chris Hallinan's talk [1] there
has been the unanswered question why the deferred initcall patch [2]
isn't mainline, yet.
Anybody remembers?
Best regards
Dirk
[1] http://sched.co/1yG5fmY
[2] http
On 21.10.2014 21:37, Bird, Tim wrote:
I'm going to respond to several comments in this one message (sorry for the
likely confusion)
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:31 AM, Nicolas Pitre [n...@fluxnic.net] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Bird,
10 matches
Mail list logo
