Hi,
here is the first results of the round:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20070404/
FFSB tests:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20070404/ffsb-write.html
Iozone:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20070404/iozone.html
Kernbuild:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20070404/kernbuild.html
On Apr 04, 2007 19:06 +0200, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
here is the first results of the round:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20070404/
Jean Noel,
thank you for the test results. It is always nice to see that ext4 is
doing so well compared to ext3 and XFS.
Ming Ming,
it should be
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 13:21 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Apr 04, 2007 19:06 +0200, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
here is the first results of the round:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20070404/
Jean Noel,
thank you for the test results. It is always nice to see that ext4 is
doing
Hi Ric,
that may be useful. Checking with the team here and tell you.
Thanks.
jean-pierre
Ric Wheeler wrote:
Jean-Pierre Dion wrote:
Hi Jose,
thank you for the feedback.
We took your remarks into account and we are doing some perfs with
iozone (close to desktop activity, mono-thread)
Hi Jose,
I have to check with the team here.
Will tell you.
Thanks.
jean-pierre
Jose R. Santos wrote:
Jean-Pierre Dion wrote:
Hi Jose,
thank you for the feedback.
We took your remarks into account and we are doing some perfs with
iozone (close to desktop activity, mono-thread) and ffsb
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:20:50AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
While it may be to late for the purposes of your OLS paper, one thing
that doesn't seem to be getting much attention is the performance of a
file system while doing many meta-data operations or throughput testing
during heavy
On Mar 30, 2007 10:43 +0200, Johann Lombardi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:20:50AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
While it may be to late for the purposes of your OLS paper, one thing
that doesn't seem to be getting much attention is the performance of a
file system while doing many
Jean-Pierre Dion wrote:
Hi Jose,
thank you for the feedback.
We took your remarks into account and we are doing some perfs with
iozone (close to desktop activity, mono-thread) and ffsb (allows to run
benchs
in a multi-thread activity like a server does, different blocks sizes...).
We
Hi all,
we already discussed during the conf calls what
benchmarks should be ran on ext4.
As we have OLS paper on the table we were thinking
here at Bull what bench t run and on which kernel.
If we want trying to compare ext3 and ext4, I guess we
should at least show that :
- ext4 has
Jean-Pierre Dion wrote:
Hi all,
we already discussed during the conf calls what
benchmarks should be ran on ext4.
As we have OLS paper on the table we were thinking
here at Bull what bench t run and on which kernel.
If we want trying to compare ext3 and ext4, I guess we
should at least show
10 matches
Mail list logo
