On 11/9/05, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
will look into this..
looks like todays (yesterdays?) checkins solved this issue.
They were related to stonithd AFAICS.
from what i saw the CRM didnt think the stonith had passed - i was
going to ask for your
On 11/22/05, Joachim Banzhaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 22. November 2005 03:29 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
On 11/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with migrating resources. The config is the same as
with my earlier postings:
I
ledge"___Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.orghttp://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-devHome Page: http://linux-ha.org/ -- Andrew Beekhof "If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college"
On 1/12/06, Francis Montagnac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think that the father of this bash script (lrm?) is setting the action
of SIGPIPE to SIG_IGN, and then cat itself notice that and resets it
to a function printing that on stderr.
You can reproduce that reliably with the following
On 1/16/06, James Pan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For the moment, in the CIM model, the cluster is represented by the
HA_Cluster class,
Most attributes of this class is the heartbeat config options. I am
thinking how to bootstrap heartbeat
in a cluster. This may be done by creating a
CTS testers please note this commit.
In order to run the same tests as you used to, you need to specify:
enable_config_writes off
in ha.cf
Also note the use of the words the current implementation related to
the CIB and PE logging. We may change this to write to disk at some
point in the
On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:23 PM, David Lee wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
BSC passes fine - I have no objections.
BSC (presumably BasicSanityCheck): what platform? (Your earlier
email was
about OSX).
Yeah, OSX. I'll be running it on sles9 (x86) shortly.
Heartbeat 2
On Jan 19, 2006, at 11:22 PM, David Lee wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:23 PM, David Lee wrote:
Thanks, Andrew. Your work is appreciated!
No probs, I'm actually hoping this may have helped some intra-program
IPC weirdness I've been seeing on OSX
On 1/20/06, Joachim Banzhaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi webadmin,
would you mind changing the website and wiki cvs pages to add the -d switch to
cvs update command from
For example, one can do a cvs co linux-ha, and got a copy of the workspace.
Once a copy is obtained, one can do a cvs
On 1/21/06, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning,
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-01-20T12:37:10, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this we'll eventually provide again. (ipfail)
except that ipfail relies on an external address, but
I don't understand why the
On Jan 21, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-01-21T11:38:18, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing to keep in mind is that if we stop monitoring a resource
when its not managed then the resources that sit on top of it may be
adversely affected since they now
On Jan 23, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-01-21T18:47:48, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
If you cast your mind back, the original purpose for managed/
unmanaged was so that we could depend on things that were outside the
CRM's control. So
racing
with crmd itself?
Probably I'm missing something, I'd appreciate any pointers.
Thanks in advance.
You can modify the CIB at runtime with the cibadmin tool
You *really* shouldn't be modifying the on disk version.
see: http://linux-ha.org/v2/AdminTools
--
Andrew Beekhof
And I'd find
On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 22:36 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Jan 23, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
You can modify the CIB at runtime with the cibadmin tool
You *really* shouldn't be modifying the on disk version.
see: http
On 1/24/06, Francis Montagnac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Assuming s/crmadmin/cibadmin/ , then yes.
Or -U if you're just modifying existing attributes or adding new
ones. (Saves you repeating everything).
In 2.0.3/CVS you can also pipe the XML to cibadmin on stdin
On Jan 24, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-01-24T17:23:39, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# cibadmin -Q | grep transition_idle_timeout
nvpair id=transition_idle_timeout
name=transition_idle_timeout value=120s/
# cibadmin -Q | sed
I thought i'd fixed it, but now I know I have.
Latest CVS will work.
On 1/26/06, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 26, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Francis Montagnac wrote:
Well he IS sending in the full parent nodes.
ahh, i didnt notice the grep wasnt in the second command
Sorry
to see private PE structures copied
into the daemon's code.
If you need access to something ASK.
Andrew
--
Andrew Beekhof
I'd find myself if I knew where myself left me - MGF
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux
On 1/26/06, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The management daemon appears to assume that all calls are synchronous.
They can be but by default they are not.
This is bad because as long as the CIB is running, the management
daemon will think that all calls succeed
On 1/26/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
CTS testers please note this commit.
In order to run the same tests as you used to, you need to specify:
enable_config_writes off
in ha.cf
Why is this an ha.cf option. It's clearly a CIB option - so I would
On 1/26/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-01-19T10:12:28, Nate Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious how the CTS is being used today. I heard it's mainly a
tool for Linux-HA
On 1/26/06, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Alan Robertson wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
If its Solaris specific, I say do what you gotta do (but perhaps
#ifdef it out for everyone else).
I disagree.
ifdefs just clutter the code, and the string
On 1/26/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 1/26/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
CTS testers please note this commit.
In order to run the same tests as you used to, you need to specify:
enable_config_writes off
On Jan 27, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 1/26/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 1/26/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
CTS testers please note this commit.
In order to run the same tests
, it
just complained a little along the way.
--
Andrew Beekhof
No means no, and no means yes, and everything in between and all the
rest - TISM
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
On 2/14/06, Francis Montagnac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This makes it sound like you still use the options though...
No I don't use them any more.
I'm not sure I see the link between the -U option being fixed (sorry
about that) and it being ok to write the CIB to the disk.
To phrase it
On 2/27/06, James Pan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a new option --resource-class was added to meet the requirement of bug
#1097,
Supported values are ocf and heartbeat, the default value will be
ocf if this
option is omitted.
Is this for the code that generates the CIB configuration?
On 3/2/06, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
while trying to dpkg-buildpackage this error appears:
dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/libcib.so.1.0.0 not found (supposed to
put it in heartbeat-2)
dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/libcrmcommon.so.1.0.0 not found
(supposed to put it
On 3/1/06, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, mkinikoglu wrote:
i setup linux-ha to two solaris boxes. (5.9 sparc). when i start heartbeat
i got these errors,
what does it mean return code 139?
The meanings of such code, and the use of crmd are not my particular
Isnt there a revised OCF standard for the membership API?
Perhaps we should be implementing this rather than patching the
current implementation (especially in a way that it would no longer
conform to the existing standard).
On 3/7/06, Huang Zhen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all
There are
On 3/7/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-03-07T18:13:24, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isnt there a revised OCF standard for the membership API?
Perhaps we should be implementing this rather than patching the
current implementation (especially in a way
On 3/9/06, Xun Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Now that we don't depend on openssl functionality, it seems that the
BuildPrereq of openssl-devel in heartbeat.spec.in should be removed.
Any objections to doing so?
none here - the replacement works work me
--- heartbeat.spec.in 27 Feb
On Mar 28, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-03-28T14:04:30, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i guess thats a good idea. though its safe to call it anyway. the
setting just wont get used.
its available in cvs for those that care. look for
$OCF_RESKEY_crm_role
]:
ERROR: stonithRA plugin: now donnot take the provider into account.
--
Andrew Beekhof
Ooo Ahhh, Glenn McRath - TISM
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http
On 3/29/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : lars
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : crm
Dir : linux-ha/crm/pengine/testcases
Modified Files:
master-6.xml
did you run the regression tests after
On 3/29/06, James Pan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need to clarify the role of the clone (or master-slave) resource.
Is it a resource container like resource group or an attribute of the
according primitive resource?
the dtd clearly defines what a clone is. what you call it is up to you.
This
On Mar 30, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-03-30T10:46:41, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, after a reboot, just run through them - the first time you
assign
one, that might be a while (is_used(id)) {id++} which might run
as far
as 20 iterations or so
,v 1.61 2006/03/18 17:23:48 andrew Exp $ */
+/* $Id: xml.c,v 1.62 2006/03/31 11:50:24 andrew Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@
#include crm/crm.h
#include crm/msg_xml.h
#include crm/common/xml.h
+
+#include clplumbing/md5.h
,v 1.105 2006/03/09 21:36:38 andrew Exp $ */
+/* $Id: pengine.c,v 1.106 2006/04/03 09:51:56 andrew Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
@@ -41,9 +41,18 @@
gboolean was_config_warning = FALSE;
unsigned int pengine_input_loglevel = LOG_INFO;
+#define
.
During the creation, incomplete resource may exist, but only in the CIM
layer. and this information
will be cached, managed and only used by the CIM Providers.
Does this bother your?
Yes, but instead of arguing about it I'll work on enforcing the DTD instead.
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 3/29
On 4/3/06, Diego Leider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I try to add a resource to the cib.xml file like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cibadmin -C -o resource -X 'primitive class=lsb
id=apache_id type=apache/'
Call cib_create failed (-25): The update was empty
null
I latterly copied the
eg 51314CH, AlmereThe Netherlandscib.xmlmessages___Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.orghttp://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-devHome Page: http://linux-ha.org/ -- Andrew Beekhof "No means no, a
On 4/4/06, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 4, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Diego Leider wrote:
Hi,
I want to do something as simple as starting the apache webserver on one
of the machines running heartbeat.
When i run the command crm_resource -V -W -r WebServerApache i get
On 4/4/06, Diego Leider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I specified use_logd in ha.cf. I attached /var/log/messages from one
of the machines. Is this what you mean?
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 13:30 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/4/06, Diego Leider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed type=Apache
On 4/8/06, Robert Heinzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I fixed the problem, by changing
DIST_SOURCES =
to
DIST_SOURCES = crm.dtd crm-1.0.dtd
only crm-1.0.dtd should be required right?
I also copied the crm files, so that both are available (crm.dtd and
crm-1.0.dtd).
2) During Build
On Apr 10, 2006, at 12:11 AM, Robert Heinzmann wrote:
only crm-1.0.dtd should be required right?
Thats right, I tested it again.
all changes have been added to CVS (i even did an rpm install myself
and there were no complaints :)
--
Andrew Beekhof
I'd find myself if I knew where
On 4/10/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xun Sun wrote:
On 3/9/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Aren't we trying to remove our dependency on openssl? I believe the
above AC_CHECK_HEADERS(openssl/md5.h) is
On 4/6/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huang Zhen wrote:
The GUI client and CIM need management library to implement batch
operation.
It means that user can add a set of operations but not need do it actually,
then commit all these operations in one command.
To do this we
On Apr 11, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-04-11T08:57:00, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and what about node attribute changes for things like ipfail?
they don't have to go in the status section.
Non-persistent temporary node attributes however should go
On 4/12/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : zhenh
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : tools
Dir : linux-ha/tools
Modified Files:
haresources2cib.py.in
Log Message:
generate the cib in the final
On 4/14/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : zhenh
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : mgmt
Dir : linux-ha/mgmt/client
Modified Files:
haclient.zh_CN.po
Log Message:
show the Master/Slave status
On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:08 PM, David Lee wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/12/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : zhenh
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : tools
Dir : linux-ha/tools
On Apr 18, 2006, at 1:09 PM, David Lee wrote:
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:08 PM, David Lee wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
config_file = /etc/ha.d/ha.cf
+ target_file = /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/cib.xml
On 4/19/06, Robert Heinzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just read the specification for OCF resource agents
(http://www.opencf.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/specs/ra/resource-agent-api.txt?rev=HEAD)
and I'm a little bit confused. The SPEC states, that the resource agents
are located under
On 4/20/06, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Running CTS with HEAD hanged the cluster after crmd dumped core
(abort). It happened after 53 tests with this curious message:
Apr 19 17:48:01 BadNews: Apr 19 17:42:48 sapcl01 crmd: [17937]: ERROR:
On 4/20/06, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/20/06, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Running CTS with HEAD hanged the cluster after crmd dumped core
(abort). It happened after 53 tests with this curious message:
Apr 19 17:48:01 BadNews: Apr 19 17:42:48
ago
(2006-04-19 16:08).
I recently got rid of a bunch of really horrible scripts that used to
test basic CRM sanity... now we leverage CTS in local-only mode.
Which is good because its picking up new problems.
What the error is about I dont know.
--
Andrew Beekhof
No means no, and no means yes
On Apr 24, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-04-24T09:50:52, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. The best reason is that if the user has asked for multiple
concurrent monitor operations, we need to know that all of them are
running.
Previously the LRM would have
]; then
: ${OCF_CHECK_LEVEL:=$OCF_RESKEY_OCF_CHECK_LEVEL}
+ else
+ OCF_CHECK_LEVEL=0
fi
You sure you don't mean -n instead of -z?
i have no idea what i mean :)
--
Andrew Beekhof
Would the last person to leave please turn out the enlightenment? -
TISM
the exact syntax with
no apparent
meaning behind it...
the use of _ vs. - is basically described as i started off with _
and got sick of pressing shift too
plus i think - looks nicer. newer options tend to use - and older
ones _
We're trying to keep you on your toes. ;-)
--
Andrew
On 4/24/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-04-24T20:53:50, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nvpair id=cib-bootstrap-options-default_resource_stickiness ...
Well, in this case it's at least completely irrelevant. The id
doesn't matter here, it matters
: http://linux-ha.org/
--
Andrew Beekhof
Eating fruit is mean and vicious... keep your hands off Golden
Delicious - TISM
___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http
On 4/28/06, Matthew Soffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get my system here to run using only the tools from ports (
to make life easier for people who only use the ports ).
When Autoconf ( v 2.59 ) is installed on FreeBSD from ports, its named
autoconf259 .I am running it with
I see you removed the section that allowed it to work on Darwin...
-if [ $arch = Darwin ]
I'm not particularly happy at this point
On 4/28/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : msoffen
Host:
Module : linux-ha
Dir
On May 2, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I see you removed the section that allowed it to work on Darwin...
-if [ $arch = Darwin ]
I'm not particularly happy at this point
It looks to me like he replaced the darwinism with a more general
check
a good idea to briefly summarize the
problem before launching into a series of input/outputs.
Remember we haven't been agonizing over the situation for as long as
you have and need the extra context :-)
Happy Heartbeating,
Andrew
--
Andrew Beekhof
If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have
of the command if [ "$arch" != "Linux" -a "$arch" != "Darwin" ]; then return 0; fi Matt On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 21:42 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On May 2, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I see you removed the section that allow
understand how what you have helps because later on you have: if $cmd /dev/null 21 thenso you still run the "which" part anyway. Matt On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 22:22 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On May 2, 2006, at 10:15 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: The ch
1.84
+++ complex.c 8 May 2006 07:36:01 - 1.85
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Id: complex.c,v 1.84 2006/05/05 13:08:49 andrew Exp $ */
+/* $Id: complex.c,v 1.85 2006/05/08 07:36:01 andrew Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
@@ -296,15 +296,7
On May 8, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-05-08T14:16:15, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point.
we also need to find a way to have it ignore the order things appear
in... thats going to be a major PITA
You mean within the CIB? Well, the order is defined
for you?
I tried to email you directly but it bounced.
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 15:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On May 8, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-05-08T14:16:15, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point.
we also need to find a way to have it ignore
d:string" minOccurs="0"/ xsd:element name="Pager" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/ /xsd:sequence /xsd:complexType xsd:complexType name="MeterReaderType" xsd:sequence xsd:elemen
;/ /xsd:sequence xsd:attribute name="cib-last_written" type="xsd:string" use="required"/ xsd:attribute name="admin_epoch" type="xsd:string" use="required"/ Matt On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 17:43 +0200, Andrew Beekhof w
On May 8, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: Andrew, What parts should fail ?well is has two "nodes" sections despite maxOccurs="1" :-) Matt On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: so as far as i can tell, the attached files _should_ fail
On 5/9/06, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
if you want a list of failed resources: crm_mon -1 | grep failed
if you just want the lrm_rsc_op's that failed, look for rc_code != 0
rc_code != 7 (where 7 is LSB for Safely Stopped) in the result of
cibadmin -Ql
On 5/10/06, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5/9/06, Peter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
although cibadmin -Ql -o status does not show the failed resource
anymore. How can I recover from this situation?
cib contents?
Oh, thanks for reminding me (I
On 5/9/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : sunjd
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : lib
Dir : linux-ha/lib/plugins/lrm
Modified Files:
raexecocf.c
Log Message:
Bug 1222 fixing - a silly bug
ok, I know
On May 20, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-05-20T11:24:37, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: properties take precedence over instance_parameters which takeprecedence over a parent's properties and instance_parameters Ok. Second, I don't think these _should_ be instance
On May 21, 2006, at 3:47 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-05-21T13:45:10, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another question... should things like an operation's interval/ timeout also show up in the meta namespace or the regular one?Momentarily ignoring issues of compatibility, I think
On May 21, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-05-21T16:04:24, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though still, how would the RA inform the tools about description defaults for this? this is where i'm a bit lost... these aren't RA parameters so in theory there's nothing
On May 26, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-05-26T09:02:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: notify: post for stopnotify active: xen-4 xen-3 xen-1notify stop: xen-2notify start: xen-4 xen-3 xen-2 xen-1 do you have an example of this? nothing i have shows this behavior
26 May 2006 08:46:07 - 1.53
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Id: utils.c,v 1.52 2006/05/22 08:31:53 andrew Exp $ */
+/* $Id: utils.c,v 1.53 2006/05/26 08:46:07 davidlee Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
@@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@
XML_LRM_ATTR_OP_DIGEST
On 5/25/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : davidlee
Host:
Module : linux-ha
Dir : linux-ha
Modified Files:
bootstrap
Log Message:
Stricter Bourne-shell compliance
a "couple" of time with larger buffers).Alan, can you please take a look at the use of MAXMSG in the IPC layer which is really not my area of expertise (especially the HBcomm plugins) and verify that my assessment is correct (and possibly get someone to look at fixing it). -- Andrew Beek
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So, that means the CIB is 256K compressed? Or is it 256K uncompressed?
its
On 5/29/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-05-29T06:44:05, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So
On 5/29/06, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So, that means the CIB
On 5/30/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-05-29T12:11:07, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't know until just a day or two ago that it broke anything
lmb, i think this change should be in a separate patch, not in cvs.
On 5/30/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : lars
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : crm
Dir : linux-ha/crm
Modified Files:
crm-1.0.dtd
dence than does knowledge"___Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.orghttp://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-devHome Page: http://linux-ha.org/ -- Andrew Beekhof "Would the last person to leave please turn out the enlight
a set of functions. It describes what data is required and how it should be organized. Pretending it can be ignored is like pretending that the contents of the mgmtd messages you pass back and forth don't matter. -- Andrew Beekhof "Would the last person to leave please turn out the enlighte
- A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"___Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.orghttp://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-devHome Page: http://linux-ha.org/ -- An
it did). -- Andrew Beekhof "Would the last person to leave please turn out the enlightenment?" - TISM ___
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
On Jun 8, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-06-08T15:58:44, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That may be a silly observation, but if you're only shifting codearound, why does this affect the testcases? not silly at all dear chap...it changes the oder actions are created
On Jun 8, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-06-08T14:14:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, I think this was also made too easy to slip in by DTDvalidation not always having been available, much less being thedefault. So really the CRM should have seg-faulted
On 6/12/06, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Tried to make pingd work. I had to change the pingd OCF RA a
bit (mostly typos), hence the patch.
Looks good, I applied it just then.
Thanks!
Notes:
. The default PID file path points to a directory owned by
root. However, it
On 6/12/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : lars
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : crm
Dir : linux-ha/crm
Modified Files:
crm-1.0.dtd
Log Message:
Work-around bug #1287: GUI currently requires empty
On Jun 13, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-06-13T09:52:24, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log Message:Work-around bug #1287: GUI currently requires empty groups to beallowed. The GUI may like to use empty groups, but it does not *require* them.And I thought we agreed
zhenh, you might need to update the GUI to reflect this.
On 6/19/06, linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org
linux-ha-cvs@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : andrew
Host:
Project : linux-ha
Module : crm
Dir : linux-ha/crm
Modified Files:
crm-1.0.dtd
Log
On 6/28/06, Huang Zhen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
You made several mistakes here, I would like to point out them.
MISTAKE 1 : Empty group is invalid configuration
Current crm-1.0.dtd shows :
!ELEMENT group (meta_attributes*, instance_attributes*, primitive*)
So it's your code wrong
1 - 100 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
