On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:31:29 +0900 (JST)
renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Kristoffer,
In addition, the error did not happen on the edit test.
I passed the test of edit even if I did not apply my patch even if I
applied a patch.
Did you execute the command of what kind of test?
Hi Kristoffer,
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I applied the patch to the
development version, not to 1.2.5, when testing.
I suspect that the difference is that in older versions, comments were
stripped completely from the configuration, but in newer versions,
comments are kept.
Hi Krstoffer,
As for the problem, contents of rpm of crmsh1.2.5 which we used seem to have a
problem somehow or other.
The problem did not occur in crm which I made from a source code of crmsh1.2.5.
The application of the patch which I donated seems to be unnecessary.
I confirm the details and
Hi Kristoffer,
In addition, the error did not happen on the edit test.
I passed the test of edit even if I did not apply my patch even if I applied a
patch.
Did you execute the command of what kind of test?
* on crmsh-7cd5688c164d.tar(tip)
(snip)
[root@rh64-2744 test]# ./regression.sh
Hi Kristoffer,
Thank you for comment.
I will look the day after tomorrow.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Fri, 2014/1/10, Kristoffer Grönlund kgronl...@suse.com wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:27:47 +0900 (JST)
renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Dejan,
I send a patch of
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:27:47 +0900 (JST)
renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Dejan,
I send a patch of crmsh1.2.5.
Similar correction seems to be necessary for latest crmsh.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi
Hello,
Thank you for the patch!
I tried applying the patch to the latest crmsh,
