* Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But! I used hdparm -t solely, 2.6 was always ~5% faster than 2.4. But
using -Tt slowed down the hd speed by about 30%. So it looks like some
scheduler interaction, perhaps the memory timing loops gets it marked
as batch or something?
to check whether
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
Hi,
Ok, one more error, this time from irq context:
AHCI: ata1: error irq, status=4001 stat=51 err=04 sstat=0113
serr=
ata1: aborting commands due to error. active_tag -1, sactive 0001
ahci: sactive 1
ata1:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 10:06 +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
I've not been able to get dual channel I/O speed faster than single
interface speed, either as 'md' RAID0 or simultaneous reading or
writing done the other day:
Time to write or read 500MB file:
summary 2.4.31-hf1
On Fri, Jul 08 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But! I used hdparm -t solely, 2.6 was always ~5% faster than 2.4. But
using -Tt slowed down the hd speed by about 30%. So it looks like some
scheduler interaction, perhaps the memory timing loops gets it
Hi,
I am using softraid 1 on two sata disks and I'm trying to get the best
possible performance. IMHO read actions (if properly addressed) should
be split over the two drivers and performed independently. However, I
don't notice anything to back this up. The read performance (with the
dreaded
On Fri, Jul 08 2005, Erik Slagter wrote:
Hi,
I am using softraid 1 on two sata disks and I'm trying to get the best
possible performance. IMHO read actions (if properly addressed) should
be split over the two drivers and performed independently. However, I
don't notice anything to back this
On Fri, Jul 08 2005, Erik Slagter wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 08:16 -0400, Danny Cox wrote:
What am I doing wrong here???
Nothing. I'll take a shot at answering this one instead of lurking
this time. Then, I'll crawl back under my rock.
The raid1 driver keeps a last
On Fri, Jul 08 2005, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
Hi,
Ok, one more error, this time from irq context:
AHCI: ata1: error irq, status=4001 stat=51 err=04 sstat=0113
serr=
ata1: aborting commands due to error.
On 7/8/05, Danny Cox wrote:
Erik,
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 14:00 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
I am using softraid 1 on two sata disks and I'm trying to get the best
possible performance. IMHO read actions (if properly addressed) should
be split over the two drivers and performed
SCSI=m must disallow static drivers.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 2 Jul 2005
--- linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig.old 2005-07-02
21:57:40.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2005-07-02
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
--- linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig.old 2005-07-02
21:57:40.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2005-07-02 21:58:06.0
+0200
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@
source drivers/scsi/megaraid/Kconfig.megaraid
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:36:08AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
--- linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig.old 2005-07-02
21:57:40.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2005-07-02
21:58:06.0 +0200
12 matches
Mail list logo
