[test 1/2] this is a test, please ignore

2007-10-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
blah blah blah sata sata sata blah blah blah - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[test 2/2] this is a test, please ignore

2007-10-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeff Garzik wrote: blah blah blah sata sata sata blah blah blah Now why in the world would you write that? Silly person. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[PATCH] drivers/ide/Kconfig IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ and IDEDISK_MULTI_MODE

2007-10-21 Thread Matti Linnanvuori
From: Matti Linnanvuori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Correct IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ description to keeping interrupts enabled when calling the PCI IDE action handler. Add IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ and IDEDISK_MULTI_MODE help text from hdparm manual page. Signed-off-by: Matti Linnanvuori [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---

Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata

2007-10-21 Thread Paul Rolland
Hello, On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:23:15 +0900 Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is reporting a : irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) together with

Re: Fwd: CMD 64x regression from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22 and 2.6.23?

2007-10-21 Thread Martin Rogge
On Saturday 20 October 2007 19:11:56 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: What I don't like is that both PIIX4 and PCI-648 are sharing IRQ15 (PIIX4 is in legacy mode, so it uses edge-triggered IRQ15 which is not shareable). You don't have drives connected to PIIX4, do you? However, it doesn't look like

Re: Problems with frozen drives on sil3124 + sil3726

2007-10-21 Thread Tejun Heo
Lars Michael Jogbäck wrote: Hi Tejun et. al. I'm running a server with Linux 2.6.18.1+Debian's Xen-patches and the sata+pmp-patches from http://home-tj.org/files/libata-tj-stable/libata-tj-2.6.18.1-20061020.tar.bz2 Unfortunately I can't upgrade to anything newer than 2.6.18 since there

Re: [PATCH] sata_nv,ahci: add the ahci legacy mode support to sata_nv

2007-10-21 Thread peer chen
Yes, link - http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/8/93 add the AHCI legacy support to sata_nv when IDE/RAID mode been set in SBIOS and Device IDs are not in ahci.c at this moment. To do so, when a new chipset come out and DIDs haven't been submited to LKML,user still can use ahci driver to handle it when

Re: ADS3GX4R5-E IO problem?

2007-10-21 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Didde Brockman wrote: Oct 20 13:49:00 infra kernel: md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 20 KB/sec) for resync. Oct 20 13:49:00 infra kernel: md: using 128k window, over a total of 244195904 blocks. Oct 20 13:50:37 infra kernel: res

BUG: sata_nv swncq cannot be disabled

2007-10-21 Thread Gerhard Dirschl
Hi, I stumbled over a bug in the sata_nv swncq code of the current 2.6.23-git kernel. ata_port_info.flags is always initialised with the ATA_FLAG_NCQ flag set, but nv_swncq_host_init(...) is only called if swncq=1 is passed to the driver (default is swncq=0). I can can observe ata link resets

Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in filesystem corruptions

2007-10-21 Thread Tejun Heo
Helo, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: I finally managed to find a *reproducible* setup and way to trigger random corruptions using a sata sil 3114 controller connected to 4 seagate drives port 1: ST3400832AS sda port 2: ST3400620AS sdb port 3: ST3750640AS sdc port 4: ST3750640AS sdd sda sdb

Re: BUG: sata_nv swncq cannot be disabled

2007-10-21 Thread Gerhard Dirschl
Former versions of the SWNCQ patch didn't have this problem as ATA_FLAG_NCQ was set in nv_swncq_host_init(...). The appended patch restores this behaviour (or was it changed for a good reason?) We could also simply drop the option to enable/disable swncq. Outch - sorry, just found the thread

Re: BUG: sata_nv swncq cannot be disabled

2007-10-21 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Gerhard Dirschl wrote: Hi, I stumbled over a bug in the sata_nv swncq code of the current 2.6.23-git kernel. ata_port_info.flags is always initialised with the ATA_FLAG_NCQ flag set, but nv_swncq_host_init(...) is only called if swncq=1 is passed to the driver (default is swncq=0). I can can

Re: sata sil3114 vs. certain seagate drives results in filesystem corruptions

2007-10-21 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 11:12 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: Helo, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: I finally managed to find a *reproducible* setup and way to trigger random corruptions using a sata sil 3114 controller connected to 4 seagate drives port 1: ST3400832AS sda port 2: ST3400620AS sdb