On Mon, Sep 09, 2002, Oleg wrote about Re: [OT] proposed
israeli laws regarding internet and encryption:
Here is the relevant text:
...
Which means that if you bought F-Secure SSH in Israel then
you can use SSH
as long as you like.
What this basically means is that if a specific
Aviram Jenik wrote:
But no, there are no exceptions to the law (such as small key size,
domestic use only, etc). Theoretically you must get a license for your
ROT13 feature in Mozilla. Practically they will not come after you
unless you are a big fish.
Ok, I'll bite. Anyone ever heard of
Hi,
Aviram Jenik wrote:
Practically they will not come after you
unless you are a big fish.
Ok, I'll bite. Anyone ever heard of a big fish they came after?
Depending on what you call come after. Our story is similar to the Eli
Biham story you wrote about. They approached us
Aviram Jenik wrote:
I totally disagree. The law is bad - it is badly phrased and makes no
practical sense. By some sheer luck, it is implemented correctly and
logically by the people who are currently responsible. But that's a
mutation - a freak of nature. Don't count on it to survive the
Aviram Jenik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The law is bad - it is badly phrased and makes no practical
sense. By some sheer luck, it is implemented correctly and logically
by the people who are currently responsible.
NB: correctly != to spec. In the end, someone will pay for it.
--
Oleg
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 12:11, Aviram Jenik wrote:
I totally disagree. The law is bad - it is badly phrased and makes no
practical sense. By some sheer luck, it is implemented correctly and
logically by the people who are currently responsible. But that's a
mutation - a freak of nature. Don't
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002, Aviram Jenik wrote about RE: [OT] proposed israeli laws
regarding internet and encryption:
I totally disagree. The law is bad - it is badly phrased and makes no
practical sense. By some sheer luck, it is implemented correctly and
logically by the people who are currently
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about Re: [OT] proposed israeli laws
regarding internet and encryption:
Yes, but they try to scare us here from small group of not
highly-organized terrorists. In this context if the technology is
availble
Thanks for the scripts. However that is not what I am looking for. I
have a Linux machine as a firewall/gateway (NATing) for the rest of the
LAN. The issue of dial on demand is that whenever a packet comes in
from the LAN destined for the outside, the dialer should kick in. When I
set the demand
I have no problem connecting without the dial-on-demand option set.
Neither do I use any chat script that I defined. I have attached a short
log showing that pppd refuses to use the demand option without some kind
of a connect script, while without it it works without a problem. In
addition, if
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002, Uri Bruck wrote about Re: [OT] proposed israeli laws regarding
internet and encryption:
In the US, supporters of the second amendment, like the NRA (National Rifle
Association) and ESR (Eric S. Raymond ;) see http://tuxedo.org/~esr/guns/)
have the saying If guns were
But according to tomorrow's edition of Boker-Tov (Good Morning),
Microsoft is crossing the borders, supports Linux, releases its own
version of Linux, and joins a group of software companies
that support
Open Source and choice/liberty.
Full story at:
Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other miracles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no problem connecting without the dial-on-demand option set.
Neither do I use any chat script that I defined. I have attached a short
log showing that pppd refuses to use the demand option
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
by civilians, or carrying automatic weapons) or what do militias have
anything to do with it (supposedly this part is a relic from the time when
having a federal army was considered a Bad Thing).
AFAIK, the original motivation for the Amendment was that
Dvir Volk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reading this site, I have a strange feeling the reporter misread
http://softwarechoice.org/ (see
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26616.html , which may have
got its author fired)
the item is (according to the writer) based on this story from
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: [OT] proposed israeli laws
regarding internet and encryption:
Absolutely. As I mentioned, in most places carrying (concealed)
weapons is forbidden. Basically, you can only keep a gun at home.
Interestingly, carrying weapons openly is
Quoting Dvir Volk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the item is (according to the writer) based on this story from CNNfn
http://money.cnn.com/2002/09/05/technology/microsoft/index.htm
which does not mention an mslinux at all ;)
Ouch. Beat Avi Blizovski on the head for poor translation. The article in
Ouch. Beat Avi Blizovski on the head for poor translation. The article in
cnn.com reads a lot different to me than the one in bokertov. The
differences are subtle, but significant. It's not MS creating its own Linux
or even having its own free software initiative. It's MS trying to defend
Does someone have experience on installing dynamic DNS + dhcpd with Linux
(specifically, Redhat, but I guess it doesn't matter much).
The situation is as follows:
I have dhcpd (on Linux), which knows about dynamic DNS and can update DNS
server. It does it OK for windows clients (i.e.,
I have setuped similar setup. It works with Windows and Linux.
I just left everything default on the client side and only made changes on
the server.
I will post the howto I wrote later when I get to work.
Oleg.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux-IL mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo
