Though it's a pretty stiff penalty for Iftach...
yes, It is.
+--- Please ignore the following Crap:
|
V
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
If you are
Are we the intended recipient ?
intended recipient is stricly the person who is listed in the To: field.
Then why not send messages
To: All Humanity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? I think this covers most who will read the message, through email
or however the archives are viewed.
On Monday 02 September 2002 12:45, Cedar Cox wrote:
Are we the intended recipient ?
intended recipient is stricly the person who is listed in the To:
field.
Then why not send messages
To: All Humanity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? I think this covers most who will read the message, through
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 12:45, Cedar Cox wrote:
Are we the intended recipient ?
intended recipient is stricly the person who is listed in the To: field.
Then why not send messages
To: All Humanity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? I think this covers most who will read the message, through
On 2 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
IANAL, but IIRC US courts have come to a bizarre conclusion that
people do not expect the same level of privacy in their electronic
communications (such as email) as in their conventional communications
(such as regular mail). This is one of the
Uri Bruck wrote:
This is a matter of who owns the resources. It's no different than posing
limitations on private phone calls on the office phones, or on company
time. When an employer provides an employee with an email account due to
the fact that this person is an employee, then this
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
So in the U.S. your employer can legaly tap your phone, read your email,
etc, in fact mine does. It's a well stated company policy.
Surely you don't mean your home phone. The wage-slavery system can only go
so far.
--
Thanks,
Uri
Last comment (but not least) :
Why not using HTML format ? Everyone can read it - a browser is installed
by default with all the popular O.S.
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use,
distribution or copying of this
Ely Levy wrote:
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use,
distribution or copying of this
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
a public mailing list.
While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
other people and so on.
anyhow
On 1 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
other people and so on.
anyhow to whoever archive this list, Puting this mail there might get you
sued
Assuming the mailing list (and
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:18:49PM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
a public mailing list.
While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
That can make problems with
I appreciate your (and others) concern. It is true - it is a bothering
message that our server is adding automatically. I try to insert few
empty lines so is will be away from the eye.
Anyhow, you can rest assure that you (not personally , but as a mailing
list member) are not subject to the
On Sunday 01 September 2002 19:17, Eliran wrote:
Ely Levy wrote:
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
On Sunday 01 September 2002 19:43, Iftach Hyams wrote:
I appreciate your (and others) concern. It is true - it is a bothering
message that our server is adding automatically. I try to insert few
empty lines so is will be away from the eye.
Anyhow, you can rest assure that you (not
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:18, you wrote:
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
a public mailing list.
While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
then he can get a yahoo\hotmail\ whatever account for
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:29, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On 1 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
other people and so on.
anyhow to whoever archive this list, Puting this mail
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:35, Guy Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:18:49PM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
a public mailing list.
While I agree in principle, it may be out of control
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
You don't see the problem now, sure.
think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
rid of linux-il for whatever reason, what easier way than the sue
Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
You don't see the problem now, sure.
think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
rid of linux-il for whatever reason, what easier way than the sue the hell
out of everyone for archiving the message?
Ely Levy
On Sunday 01 September 2002 21:06, Guy Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
You don't see the problem now, sure.
think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
rid of
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: [OT] Looking for jobs:
Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
a public mailing list.
While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
I hear this from many
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002, Guy Cohen wrote about Re: [OT] Looking for jobs:
I'm not a lawyer buy im wondering what is their case. Having your
mail server auto-add a message claiming your message is the property
of your boss, and adds a do not touch sign, makes it legal for them
to sue you
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002, Amir Tal wrote about Re: [OT] Looking for jobs:
bottom line : its not clear, it makes us jumpy - loose it ! or else.. ;)
According to my personal archives (oops, I can be sued!) we already asked
Iftach a year ago (september 2001) to lose this signature on this mailing
Nadav Har'El wrote:
[1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
This argument is flawed because of a perhaps unexpected point Nadav has
forgotten. While it is true that Gershom forbade read
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 00:29, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Nadav Har'El wrote:
[1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
This argument is flawed because of a perhaps unexpected point Nadav
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+--- Please ignore the following Crap:
I did not. ;-)
[1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
There's no need to say that on every email as that
This is Relevant as such tips help Linux people to advance and by advancing
they take linux step by step to recognation
One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
format
also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
and thats relevant to the list
Actually he has a point. Consider who's receiving CVs nowadays.
It's quite possible an entire office doesn't have Acrobat Reader installed,
or at least most of them don't have it..
Just a thought tho
Eli
PS.
On a personal note, I doubt you'll have trouble finding a job with what you
know, so
Just my 2 agorot: The looking for job/employee notices are certainly on topic,
if its a Linux job you are looking for, or offering.
- yba
Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
off list
this is not an excuse.
many off topics run on this list and i personaly thinks that most of them
are very intresting
One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
format also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
and thats relevant to the list because?
Because NONE of the HR departments are accepting PDF! and if someone wants to
find a job, he better have a
On Thursday 29 August 2002 13:19, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
format also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
and thats relevant to the list because?
Because NONE of the HR departments are accepting
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 10:19, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
format also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
and thats relevant to the list because?
Because NONE of the HR departments are accepting
On Thursday 29 August 2002 12:02, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
Just my 2 agorot: The looking for job/employee notices are certainly on
topic, if its a Linux job you are looking for, or offering.
yes they are, CV's HOWTO's are not.
tal.
- yba
Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
off list
this is
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about Re: [OT] Looking for jobs:
Anything that you own or have (a job in this case) that you cannot let
go of, isn't really yours - it owns you. I'm not a very good slave. The
Well spoken.
Though this kind of Buddhist philosophy is very hard
Howdie,
Due to non important reasons I quit my previous job and I'm looking for
both consulting jobs and long term employment offers. If anyone here is
in need of an Linux guru, kernel hacker, driver writer, embedded Linux
developer, not to mention international man of mystery, feel free to
drop
Gilad,
as much as I know you - you'll find a job pretty quicly (although salleries
are pretty low right now - a good kernel programmer gets about 15-18k nis
bruto)
One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word format
also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 20:57, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Gilad,
as much as I know you - you'll find a job pretty quicly (although
salleries are pretty low right now - a good kernel programmer gets about
15-18k nis bruto)
One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
39 matches
Mail list logo
