2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
On 04/06/13 15:28, Erez D wrote:
thanks,
so i guess if i use unidirectional connection, and the reader does not
expect to get an EOF()
thank i'm safe.
Why are you so keen on
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM, E.S. Rosenberg e...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
wrote:
On 04/06/13 15:28, Erez D wrote:
thanks,
so i guess
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz wrote:
On 04/06/13 15:28, Erez D wrote:
thanks,
so i guess if i use unidirectional connection, and the reader does not
expect to get an EOF()
thank i'm safe.
Why are you so keen on doing it wrong?
No, you are not
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM, E.S. Rosenberg e...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
wrote:
On 04/06/13 15:28, Erez D wrote:
thanks,
so i guess if i use unidirectional connection, and
re:all, forgot to change my from field.
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM, E.S. Rosenberg e...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz
wrote:
On 04/06/13 15:28,
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:29 PM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.ilwrote:
re:all, forgot to change my from field.
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM, E.S. Rosenberg e...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Tue,
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:29 PM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.il
wrote:
re:all, forgot to change my from field.
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM, E.S. Rosenberg e...@g.jct.ac.il wrote:
2013/6/6 Erez D
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:45 PM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.ilwrote:
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:29 PM, E.S. Rosenberg esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.il
wrote:
re:all, forgot to change my from field.
2013/6/6 Erez D erez0...@gmail.com:
On 06/06/13 18:14, Erez D wrote:
Just have the parent request another child from the child,
can't do - i do not have the source of the child. ( i do fork+exec )
Remind me why you insist on one pipe for all children? What are you
going to do if the children's lifetime overlaps? What is
Nothing. You're just wasting resources (file descriptors) and making your
code a bit harder to understand and maintain.
Note that for pipe(), you can use both fds at both ends of the pipe, but
it's very easy to get into a race condition.Better to open a pair of pipes,
one for each direction (of
On 06/04/2013 02:43 PM, ronys wrote:
Nothing. You're just wasting resources (file descriptors) and making
your code a bit harder to understand and maintain.
It kind of says to anyone reading the code that you put the minimum into
creating it you could, and implies there are details that were
Bt. Wrong.
If the unused side of the pipe is left open by the process which doesn't
read it then it will be considered as open even if the other side closed
it, therefore preventing the reading process from receiving the EOF mark
(read(2) returning zero bytes).
And just to backup my claim
On 4 June 2013 21:43, ronys ro...@gmx.net wrote:
Nothing. You're just wasting resources (file descriptors) and making your
code a bit harder to understand and maintain.
Note that for pipe(), you can use both fds at both ends of the pipe, but
it's very easy to get into a race condition.Better
thanks,
so i guess if i use unidirectional connection, and the reader does not
expect to get an EOF()
thank i'm safe.
thanks,
erez.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Amos Shapira amos.shap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 June 2013 21:43, ronys ro...@gmx.net wrote:
Nothing. You're just wasting
ְAlso, you might cause other software that inherits the fds to
fail/complain/whatever.
I only mention this because just yesterday I noticed that when running
'lvs' on my
Debian wheeze laptop, I get:
File descriptor 3 (/usr/share/bash-completion/completions) leaked on
lvs invocation. Parent PID
On 04/06/13 15:28, Erez D wrote:
thanks,
so i guess if i use unidirectional connection, and the reader does not
expect to get an EOF()
thank i'm safe.
Why are you so keen on doing it wrong?
No, you are not safe. If the child process dies because of a
segmentation fault (or whatever), the
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I stand by my posting so far.
Well, while it was making the round trip to the list and back, I also
made a trip to the bookshelf to check myself. Item 15 of Scott
Meyers's
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Well, while it was making the round trip to the list and back, I also
made a trip to the bookshelf to check myself. Item 15 of Scott
Meyers's Effective C++ confirms what I wrote: temps are const, and
for the reasons I covered. It explicitly says that with a declaration
like
Couple of points,
1. In normal circumstances the compiler automatically generates a
bitwise copy constructor if none is present. This can be verified
easily. Note that in this case, the copy ctor is declared but not
implemented which means the compiler will not create a default copy
ctor.
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no difference between the first a() and the second
a(). Both are temporary variables of type a generated by an empty
constructor.
Yes, there is a difference, and I suspect that is what you are
missing. In the first case you create a temp a()
Omer Zak wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
class a {
public:
explicit a(int param);
What is the meaning of 'explicit' declaration?
Is this a C++ keyword which was added since I learned C++?
Explicit
Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replying to myself, because I forgot one more point:
From what I remember about C++, you need also a copy constructor in this
case,
In this case a copy constructor is not invoked.
because you strive to copy a value to a
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm wondering WHY temporary implicit variables
should be considered const. It's clear that the compiler does consider
them like that.
[snip]
See
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
class a {
public:
explicit a(int param);
a operator= ( a that );
};
int main()
{
a var1(3);
var1=a(5);
return 0;
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
class a {
public:
explicit a(int param);
a operator= ( a that );
};
int main()
{
a var1(3);
var1=a(5);
return 0;
}
Somewhat surprisingly, this does not compile:
g++ -Wall -gtestcompile.cc -o
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
class a {
public:
explicit a(int param);
a operator= ( a that );
};
int main()
{
a var1(3);
var1=a(5);
return 0;
}
Somewhat surprisingly,
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Hi Shachar,
Compilers generate const temporaries to prevent accidental passing of
such a temporary to a function that would be able to modify its
argument. If that were allowed the programmer would be surprized
because only the compiler-generated temporary would be modified,
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Hi Shachar,
Compilers generate const temporaries to prevent accidental passing of
such a temporary to a function that would be able to modify its
argument. If that were allowed the programmer would be surprized
because
Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I stand by my posting so far.
Well, while it was making the round trip to the list and back, I also
made a trip to the bookshelf to check myself. Item 15 of Scott
Meyers's Effective C++ confirms what I wrote: temps are const, and
for the reasons I
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I stand by my posting so far.
Well, while it was making the round trip to the list and back, I also
made a trip to the bookshelf to check myself. Item 15 of Scott
Meyers's Effective C++ confirms what I wrote: temps are
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
class a {
public:
explicit a(int param);
What is the meaning of 'explicit' declaration?
Is this a C++ keyword which was added since I learned C++?
a operator= ( a that );
Replying to myself, because I forgot one more point:
From what I remember about C++, you need also a copy constructor in this
case, because you strive to copy a value to a variable (and in this
special case, the value is a constant instance of a class).
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
On
Yes, explicit keyword is here long time ago. Get a C++ book from more details.
At the moment, C++ decides that binding a non-const ref to a
temporary is wrong. Thats the problem.
Kobi.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:04:52 +0200 (EET), Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Shachar
guy keren wrote:
int i;
int j = i;
int k = j;
if (k 0) blablabla...
valgrind will only point the last one as an error (at least, that's how it
is in valgrind-1.0.3).
Actually, that's intentional. Otherwise, consider the following example:
struct padding {
char a;
int b;
} struct a, b;
.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Orna Agmon wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, guy keren wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Orna Agmon wrote:
Valgrind is not always correct. It sometimes reports errors which do not
exists - they have no reason to exist and other memory checkers (such as
third) do not find
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Orna Agmon wrote:
Valgrind is not always correct. It sometimes reports errors which do not
exists - they have no reason to exist and other memory checkers (such as
third) do not find them.
that, ofcourse, is no proof - the other checker might be too limited, or
have a
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, guy keren wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Orna Agmon wrote:
Valgrind is not always correct. It sometimes reports errors which do not
exists - they have no reason to exist and other memory checkers (such as
third) do not find them.
that, ofcourse, is no proof - the other
Quoting Aviv Goll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You better fix all vargrind errors. It takes time to understand
why they are happening. The stability of my applications have bin
raised significantly high after fixing all vargrind errors.
Additional thing to test in valgring is gracefull shutdown of
you
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:16:23 +0200, Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:45:52 +0200,
Aviv Goll wrote:
hi,
I'm currently writing an assignment in c++ using g++.
according to some printouts, during the following lines:
stringstream Fstr;
fstrblah blah;
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:12:28AM +0200, Aviv Goll wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:16:23 +0200, Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:45:52 +0200,
Aviv Goll wrote:
hi,
I'm currently writing an assignment in c++ using g++.
according to some printouts, during
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
Aviv, nobody thought that modern C++ compilers/OSes can't compile/run
this piece of code. The bug is obviously elsewhere in your program. Now,
traditionally, it would be hard to debug - you'd, as someone else
suggested, find a minimal subset of
At Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:45:52 +0200,
Aviv Goll wrote:
hi,
I'm currently writing an assignment in c++ using g++.
according to some printouts, during the following lines:
stringstream Fstr;
fstrblah blah;
Just tried running just that and had no problem. Do notice that in the first
line
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:02:07AM -0400, William Sherwin wrote:
Ever since I reconfigured my console to work with Hebrew (which it does,
at least in vim, except that the kuf does not display: it displays as a
blank space),
What vim: vim in a terminal? (what terminal?)? gvim? If gvim: what
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:02:07AM -0400, William Sherwin wrote:
Ever since I reconfigured my console to work with Hebrew (which it does,
at least in vim, except that the kuf does not display: it displays as a
blank space),
What vim: vim in a terminal? (what terminal?)?
Yury Chursa wrote:
And this string [en_US.UTF-8] also present in output of [locale -a] ?
If not you must use locale-def(part of libc utilities) for generating
locale specific data.
It is not present and, when I tried to add it, and add the keymap that I
use, I got the following errors:
William Sherwin wrote:
Yury Chursa wrote:
And this string [en_US.UTF-8] also present in output of [locale -a] ?
If not you must use locale-def(part of libc utilities) for generating
locale specific data.
It is not present and, when I tried to add it, and add the keymap that
I use, I got the
On 26 Jun 2003, Gilboa Davara wrote:
I do OS abstraction layers for a living (among others) so I know how an
efficient underlaying should look like. STL is *far* from that.
How should one design an OS abstraction layer, if one wants to have
high-quality OS abstraction layer by whatever
Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.. you are right... it is getting (way) off-topic fast.
Here's a stupid question for you: Where's the Hacker-IL mailing
list?
http://www.iglu.org.il/mailing-lists/hackers-il.html
Spared you going to
http://www.google.com/search?q=hackers-il
--
Oleg
STL is one of the worst pieces of code I ever saw in my life. It's a
good example to what happens if you decide to take OO design a couple of
steps too far.
Gilboa
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 23:43, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 21:26, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Funny enough... I know
.. But two wrongs don't make a right.
STL sucks doesn't mean that sun's JRE (not the same I know) doesn't.
Same goes for .net, MFC, and ATL.
Gilboa
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 00:39, Gilboa Davara wrote:
STL is one of the worst pieces of code I ever saw in my life. It's a
good example to what
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:39:19AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
STL is one of the worst pieces of code I ever saw in my life. It's a
good example to what happens if you decide to take OO design a couple of
steps too far.
Your quote above is 100% content free. Could you please back the above
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:09:51AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
This message brought the you by the coalition against content free
misinformed ramblings on linux-il.
How do you have time to sleep, then?
procmail.
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 01:21, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:39:19AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
STL is one of the worst pieces of code I ever saw in my life. It's a
good example to what happens if you decide to take OO design a couple of
steps too far.
Your quote above
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:39:19AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
STL is one of the worst pieces of code I ever saw in my life. It's a
good example to what happens if you decide to take OO design a
couple of steps too far.
What experience have you got with STL? What has it got to do with OOP?
Sadly enough my company has used (past tense) STL (No, I don't do C++, I
don't touch it), and I was forced, times and times again to debug deep
into the damn thing. (Helping other coworkers locate crashes within the
library).
It's over-designed, bloated, fairly slow, unreadable, impossible to
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 07:58:59AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 01:21, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:39:19AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
STL is one of the worst pieces of code I ever saw in my life. It's a
good example to what happens if you decide
HM Last time that I heard, in Ben-Gurion university, the first programming
HM language was Java. That's a swell idea in my opinion. Java is
HM feature-complete, you can't argue with that. It also means that students
I can. Too many times I have heard from Java guys working next door
phrases like
Quoting Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can. Too many times I have heard from Java guys working next door
phrases like This feature works starting with Java 1.x and saw This
feature is deprecated.
Say hi to the guys next door... But really, I think you misinterpret this. Yes,
there
At 10:20 08.06.2003 +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
HM Last time that I heard, in Ben-Gurion university, the first programming
HM language was Java. That's a swell idea in my opinion. Java is
HM feature-complete, you can't argue with that. It also means that students
I can. Too many times I have
On 2003/06/08 12:01, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
Java itself, the language, hasn't changed since JDK 1.1 (released in 97
if I'm not mistaken).
Nearly so.
JDK 1.1 added the strictfp keyword, and JDK 1.4 added the assert
keyword.
Eran
Eran Tromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2003/06/08 12:01, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
Java itself, the language, hasn't changed since JDK 1.1 (released in 97
if I'm not mistaken).
Nearly so.
JDK 1.1 added the strictfp keyword, and JDK 1.4 added the assert
keyword.
Reportedly, more
At 13:16 08.06.2003 +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
On 2003/06/08 12:01, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
Java itself, the language, hasn't changed since JDK 1.1 (released in 97
if I'm not mistaken).
Nearly so.
JDK 1.1 added the strictfp keyword, and JDK 1.4 added the assert
keyword.
True, yes...
On 2003/06/08 12:56, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Reportedly, more important changes will be introduced in 1.5,
including
[snip]
templates (dubbed generics)
Hardly! In Java's new generics you declare what the template argument
must extend/implement.
In C++'s templates the template code just
Oh goodie, a holy war :-) [seen on usenet] Well, this is a long
thread (and yes, I've read it all) and I feel like replying at almost
every point so I'll reply in one piece ;).
I've learnt mainly Pascal for my 5 points bagrut. Now that I think of
it, the most characterizing thing about this is
AM and many other universities teach Scheme in their introduction
AM to CS classes. Scheme has garbage collection, no pointer
AM arithmetics, unboundedly
Well, I personally never understood how anybody can use, let alone like, a
language that has '(' and ')' as it's only syntax and I personally
AM The main change since JDK1.1 was the clean and fairly complete
AM Collections framework in JDK 1.2, but that's of course not a
AM language change (although it's much more important than scrictfp
AM or assert).
It definitely is. Standard Java library is a part of Java language
package, as well
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:51:46PM +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
AM and many other universities teach Scheme in their introduction
AM to CS classes. Scheme has garbage collection, no pointer
AM arithmetics, unboundedly
Well, I personally never understood how anybody can use, let alone
The best Paul Graham article on this subject is
http://www.paulgraham.com/paulgraham/icad.html
Which should convince you that if someone is telling you that language A
he knows and you don't is better than language B you both know, you
should learn at least a little of A just in case he's right.
Quoth Voguemaster on Sat, Jun 07, 2003:
Well, I'm no expert in Perl but I know enough C++ to quickly dismiss
your comments about it being bloated. Yes, it DOES have some overhead,
but it is extremely negligible. In terms of performance, you only need
to know what you're doing to get the same
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003, Herouth Maoz wrote about Re: C flame (was: FS/OS in schools):
Quoting Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Let's face it, when you teach someone to drive its enough to teach them
to use the pedals and the steering-wheel. But when you teach someone to
become a mechanic
On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 17:49:39 +0300, Vadim Vygonets vadik-linux-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't talking about speed and overhead, I was talking about
all the different features of C++.
Vadik.
How do you consider those features as bloating ???
Those features are great for good program design.
://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oleg Goldshmidt
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: C vs. Pascal vs. the World [was Re: Edu in linux]
Shlomi Fish
/spamwarning.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oleg Goldshmidt
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: C vs. Pascal vs. the World [was Re: Edu in linux]
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 3 Jan 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And C is the only language that is expected to bootstrap
itself.[1]
snipped to footnote
[1] - There are a few exceptions. ghc is an Haskell compiler that is the
only tool capable of compiling its own Haskell
, January 03, 2003 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: C vs. Pascal vs. the World [was Re: Edu in linux]
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And C is the only language that is expected to bootstrap
itself.[1]
snipped to footnote
[1] - There are a few exceptions. ghc
Hi Alexander! Next time please delete the rest of the message - it was
quite long.
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
I won't get into this war, but I'll respond to a small comment:
And you do need a good Java debugger. Trust me. You could always use a
good debugger,
Hi Alexander! Next time please delete the rest of the message - it was
quite long.
Ok.
As much as a code can be well-thought and well-designed, there can always
be typos and things you did not thought about. A misplaced operator, two
consecutive if's instead of one nested in the other or
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
Hi Alexander! Next time please delete the rest of the message - it was
quite long.
Ok.
As much as a code can be well-thought and well-designed, there can always
be typos and things you did not thought about. A misplaced operator, two
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And C is the only language that is expected to bootstrap
itself.[1]
snipped to footnote
[1] - There are a few exceptions. ghc is an Haskell compiler that is the
only tool capable of compiling its own Haskell code. The GNU Ada compiler
is written in
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002, Erez Doron wrote about c/unix question:
hi
I am trying to open a tcp port to a server, did it and it works.
now i blocked the server via firewall.
trying to connect just hangs.
how do i make 'connect' timeout ?
What is usually done is to use non-blocking
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:00:21PM +0300, Erez Doron wrote:
hi
I am trying to open a tcp port to a server, did it and it works.
now i blocked the server via firewall.
trying to connect just hangs.
how do i make 'connect' timeout ?
In this case, you make your firewall REJECT the
Gold Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding Oleg Goldshmidt message quoted bellow
Look, I really did not want to get bogged down in a flame
war like the ones that (saddly) errupted here and there on this list.
No one flamed anyone. I suggested staying away from Schildt's books,
and
From: Erez Doron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that printf does not sync it's buffers until a newline
so no progress bar is displayed until the job ends.
how do i solve this ?
Try
fflush(stdout);
Sagi
=
To unsubscribe,
-Original Message-
From: Sagi Bashari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Erez Doron; ilug
Subject: Re: c question
From: Erez Doron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that printf does not sync it's buffers until
a newline
so no progress
thanks to all who replied
i mistakfully tried fsync instead of fflush
fflush solved my problem
erez.
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 13:39, Sagi Bashari wrote:
From: Erez Doron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that printf does not sync it's buffers until a newline
so no progress bar is displayed
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Omer Musaev wrote about RE: c question:
Instead of using buffered output and flushing it on every char,
you can use raw output.
..
---
write(1, #, 1 ) ; /* man write(2) */
sleep( 1 ) ;
This is getting
It has nothing to do with C (except the fact that most of the O.S. I know
has API is in C).
It has to do with the implementation by the OS + runtime library of the
printf and stderr. Anyhow, fputc is your friend. It doesn't solve your
problem but is more likely to use when writing single non
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Iftach Hyams wrote about RE: c question:
It has nothing to do with C (except the fact that most of the O.S. I know
has API is in C).
It has to do with the implementation by the OS + runtime library of the
printf and stderr.
This is not true. The standard IO library
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure, however, whether stdout's default buffering (see my
previous email) is mandated in the standard (Harbison Steele and
Kernighan Ritchie are very vague on this issue).
I doubt that buffering is specified in ANSI C. It is more likely to be
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Omer Musaev wrote about RE: c question:
Instead of using buffered output and flushing it on every char,
you can use raw output.
..
---
write(1, #, 1 ) ; /* man write(2
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote about Re: c question:
When I worked in Smart-Link and asked a more experienced fellow programmer
how I can, in the Win32 RTL, convert an open() filehandle to its Windows
HFILE equivalent, he told me that mixing IO for two different kinds of
handles
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:00:36PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
write(1, World!\n, 7);
please use fileno(stdout). daemon writers everywhere will thank you.
--
The ill-formed Orange
Fails to satisfy the eye: http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~mulix/
Segmentation fault.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:00:36PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
write(1, World!\n, 7);
please use fileno(stdout). daemon writers everywhere will thank you.
You're right about the existance of the fileno() function, but I'm
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:17:16PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:00:36PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
write(1, World!\n, 7);
please use fileno(stdout). daemon writers everywhere will thank you
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached a short program and a longer compilation output.
If I understand it correctly then the type
mapstring, string
is not acceptable.
But why? The compilation output mentions `reference to reference'. Can
you elaborate on this or do
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:17:16PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
stdout = fopen(/my/logging/file);
stderr = fopen(/my/other/logging/file);
Ok, I get your point. I don't remember seeing any program doing something
like
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:47:13PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:17:16PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
stdout = fopen(/my/logging/file);
stderr = fopen(/my/other/logging/file);
Ok, I get your point. I
.
Some people are too narrowminded.
Shachar
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:17:16PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
stdout = fopen(/my/logging/file);
stderr = fopen(/my/other/logging/file);
Ok, I get your
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:03:40PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Just wanted to quote an amuzing experience I had in the single haifux
club meeting I attended. I made a comment about something only working
on Linux, and having to use X in order to make it Unix compatible, and
got bemused
-Original Message-
From: Shaul Karl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [C++] What is wrong with mapstring, string ?
Attached a short program and a longer compilation output.
If I understand it correctly then the
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
