"Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe you're referring to "gentoo" that do such a compilation.
IIRC Mandrake used to compile for i586 in good old days, while RH
compiled for i386.
>
> It's very hard to obtain more than 10%-15% speed increase from gcc just
> by compiling for a speci
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "Re: Request for update on the
current Linux Distributions.":
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> > The guy basically asked for a "faster distribution". With all due respect
&g
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> The guy basically asked for a "faster distribution". With all due respect
> to the various distributions and their specific advantages and disadvantages,
> significant speed difference isn't one of these things. Other that +-10%
I'd s
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote about "Re: Request for update on the
current Linux Distributions.":
> Hi,
>
> Is there a real, urgent, need for a new religious war? There are tons
> of places on the net for such comparisons. Why don't you sear
Hi,
Is there a real, urgent, need for a new religious war? There are tons
of places on the net for such comparisons. Why don't you search google
for e.g. "linux distribution comparison"?
Last time there was a weeks-long thread about gentoo/Debian/RedHat and
some more, without conclusive results. I
I have always use
Red Hat and haven't had any problems with this
distribution until
now. I have been playing a little with Red Hat 8.0
this week and
noticed that it's quite slow when running X apps like
konsole, konquerer
& emacs (on a Pentium 4 1.5Mhz).
Is it time to shop
around for a dif
