Hi
I managed to get a reiserfs filesystem corruption in a number of
computers. In the logs I ssee the message:
__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed
From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means something is
fishy. From searching I see many related messages around kernel-2.4.10
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means something is
fishy.
0 order allocation failed means the kernel couldn't allocate even one
page of memory. Unless the machines are pretty much out of memory,
that should
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
I managed to get a reiserfs filesystem corruption in a number of
computers. In the logs I ssee the message:
__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed
From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means something is
fishy. From searching I see many related messages
Can you elaborate on the circumstances / environment?
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
I managed to get a reiserfs filesystem corruption in a number of
computers. In the logs I ssee the message:
__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed
From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:30:15AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means something is
fishy.
0 order allocation failed means the kernel couldn't allocate even one
page of
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:15:17AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:30:15AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means something is
fishy.
0 order
