OT: Have Netvision installed some new proxy?

2009-10-28 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Hi,

Within the last few days, trying to watch any video (not just in YouTube),
doesn't show any video for quite a long time (even minutes) and then it
catches up and quickly fills the buffers, which is very annoying. Again,
it's not only youtube, it's some other web sites which shows quicktime video
for example.

Did you also noticed this behavior?

Thanks,
Hetz

-- 
Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: can the BIOS be changed from Linux? - failed overclocking with new computer

2009-10-28 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 07:28 +0200, lior wrote:
 On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:44:17 +0200, Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com wrote:
  I just bought a new computer, install Ubuntu 9.10 beta (not the RC as
  it was not out yet)
  and after I try to reboot, the computer does not even reach the BIOS
  boot sequence.
  (blank screen).
  After letting it rest for some time I can turn it on, then it gets to
  the BIOS boot and displays the
  following error:
 
  Warning!!! The previous overclocking had failed, and system will
  restore its default setting.
  Press any key to continue...
 
  Pressing a key makes it boot but the happens again after one or two
  bootings.
 
  Oh, an *I* have not touched the BIOS and *I* did not configure
  overclocking.
 
  I already took the computer back once and they told me about some rare
  thing that happens
  only once every 2 years that the BIOS is flips.
  I think they just either did not configure it well or for some reason
  it gets broken after the first boot.
  Or something is broken or incompatible in the hardware.
 
 
  The question if Linux might change the BIOS or cause this problem?
  If not, what do you think could be the reason and the fix?
 
  Here are the details of the computer (from the order form) just in
  case someone can see
  some parts that do not work well with Linux or with each other.
 
  CPU: Q8200 2.33 Gh 4MB Core 2 Quad
  mother board: G41M-E43 DDR3 HDMI MSI
  screen card: Nvidia GeForce 9400Gt 512MB P.P.View
  HD: 500 Gb SATA2 16 Mb Hitachi
  Memory: CL7 DBT GEIL 2x2Gb (4Gb) DDR3 1066 Mhz
  DVD: GH22NS SATA LG DVDX22 DL
  power: 350W FAN 12 CM Power man
 
 

 I think you might be underpowered. I input the above specification in the
 newegg PSU calculator and got ~390W.

 http://educations.newegg.com/tool/psucalc/index.html

 The boot sequence is one point in time where you might notice this.

 Lior

 I second the above.
 You need at -least- a 450w PSU for this machine.
 (In your case, the CPU + GPU alone can eat more than 250w...)

 - Gilboa

Interesting.
I took back the computer again. They called me 3 days later and
told me they tried to reboot it 100 times and it worked fine.

They also told me to look at the power calculator of MSI
http://www.msi.com/index.php?func=power
and that one shows that I need less than 300 W.

Very strange and I am not sure what to do with this whole situation.


Gabor

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


how to disable PolicyKit?

2009-10-28 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt

Hi,

I suspect that some package update is to blame, but my home Fedora 10
(too busy - or lazy - to upgrade to 11) has recently acquired
something called PolicyKit, probably as a dependency of something
else.

It seems to be a complicated and cumbersome authentication/security
framework that so far has not done me much harm (I think), but I blame
it for popping up annoying and meaningless (to me) authorization
dialog forms requiring username and password for all kinds of weird
things, URLs, etc. http://scripts.felloweb.com comes to mind as one
of the recent ones, I tried to check what it is but the site requires
a password from a browser as well, I still don't know what it is).

I tried to google, to read the docs, and to poke around the system. I
added result=yes to the config file for my user to tell it I can do
anything I want on my computer. What I really want to do is to kill
the beast once and for all. It looks incredibly complicated, I can't
make sense of the documentation (and I am pretty good at parsing
manuals, if I say so myself), and for the life of me I can't figure
out why, on top of sudo, pam, SElinux, and everything else I need this
thing from the fscking Gnome (pardon my French - I don't even use
Gnome, but there is PolicyKit-kde as well).

Does anyone know how I can disable the bloody thing globally so that
it shuts up once and for all? I am wary of uninstalling it bluntly
after I tried to trace the RPM dependencies and got lost in the forest
- the dependency net is cast widely indeed. Is it safe to rpm -e
--nodeps? Will anything serious break? 

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Oleg Goldshmidt | p...@goldshmidt.org

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il