Re: [OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option
last time i checked (a year ago) with celcom, it depended on the APN sphone - used NAT internetg - did not use NAT On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:12 AM, E.S. Rosenbergwrote: > Hi all, > I was told by Bezeq that they currently don't have infrastructure > where I am living so I'm looking at using a cellular modem instead. > Ideally I'd like to have some remote access to home but if the > Cellular network is Carrier Grade NAT I can forget about that (unless > I create a reverse SSH tunnel from one of my servers which I guess can > be an option). > > Is any carrier offering 3/4G with real IP(v6) addresses? > Thanks, > Eliyahu - אליהו > > ___ > Linux-il mailing list > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il > ___ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
Re: [OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option
2017-06-03 20:21 GMT+03:00 Noam Meltzer: > Hi, > > Partner are offering "real" IPv4 address for an extra fee to their business > customers. > I've previously set such a configuration for my parents in law and for the > past 3.5 years it's working flawlessly AFAIK. > > I don't know if they offer IPv6 and the reasons for originally choosing > Partner are non technical. IPv6 is not a demand I just figured that if they are doing IPv6 networking the chance is higher that I'd be getting a real IP address and I have how to route IPv6 traffic. Will be looking into my options. Thanks, Eliyahu - אליהו > > - Noam > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, 01:13 E.S. Rosenberg wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I was told by Bezeq that they currently don't have infrastructure >> where I am living so I'm looking at using a cellular modem instead. >> Ideally I'd like to have some remote access to home but if the >> Cellular network is Carrier Grade NAT I can forget about that (unless >> I create a reverse SSH tunnel from one of my servers which I guess can >> be an option). >> >> Is any carrier offering 3/4G with real IP(v6) addresses? >> Thanks, >> Eliyahu - אליהו >> >> ___ >> Linux-il mailing list >> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il >> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il ___ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
Re: [OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option
Hi, Partner are offering "real" IPv4 address for an extra fee to their business customers. I've previously set such a configuration for my parents in law and for the past 3.5 years it's working flawlessly AFAIK. I don't know if they offer IPv6 and the reasons for originally choosing Partner are non technical. - Noam On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, 01:13 E.S. Rosenbergwrote: > Hi all, > I was told by Bezeq that they currently don't have infrastructure > where I am living so I'm looking at using a cellular modem instead. > Ideally I'd like to have some remote access to home but if the > Cellular network is Carrier Grade NAT I can forget about that (unless > I create a reverse SSH tunnel from one of my servers which I guess can > be an option). > > Is any carrier offering 3/4G with real IP(v6) addresses? > Thanks, > Eliyahu - אליהו > > ___ > Linux-il mailing list > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il > ___ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il