3.16.85-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tahsin Erdogan <tah...@google.com>

This is just a small part of commit dec214d00e0d7 "ext4: xattr inode
deduplication" that makes checks for metadata_csum feature safer and is
actually needed by following fixes.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tah...@google.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
[bwh: Ported to 3.16: Use EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -2411,21 +2411,24 @@ extern void ext4_group_desc_csum_set(str
 extern int ext4_register_li_request(struct super_block *sb,
                                    ext4_group_t first_not_zeroed);
 
-static inline int ext4_has_group_desc_csum(struct super_block *sb)
-{
-       return EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
-                                         EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM) ||
-              (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_chksum_driver != NULL);
-}
-
 static inline int ext4_has_metadata_csum(struct super_block *sb)
 {
        WARN_ON_ONCE(EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
                        EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM) &&
                     !EXT4_SB(sb)->s_chksum_driver);
 
-       return (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_chksum_driver != NULL);
+       return EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
+                       EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM) &&
+              (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_chksum_driver != NULL);
+}
+
+static inline int ext4_has_group_desc_csum(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+       return EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
+                                         EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM) ||
+               ext4_has_metadata_csum(sb);
 }
+
 static inline ext4_fsblk_t ext4_blocks_count(struct ext4_super_block *es)
 {
        return ((ext4_fsblk_t)le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count_hi) << 32) |

Reply via email to