Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 07:34:39 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 18-11-15, 13:33, Punit Agrawal wrote: > > Thanks for the Ack. > > > > Will you or Rafael be picking up the series or do they need to go via > > arm-soc? > > Rafael will pick this up, it should go via PM tree. Applied now,

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 07:34:39 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 18-11-15, 13:33, Punit Agrawal wrote: > > Thanks for the Ack. > > > > Will you or Rafael be picking up the series or do they need to go via > > arm-soc? > > Rafael will pick this up, it should go via PM tree. Applied now,

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

On 18-11-15, 13:33, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Thanks for the Ack. > > Will you or Rafael be picking up the series or do they need to go via > arm-soc? Rafael will pick this up, it should go via PM tree. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

Viresh Kumar writes: > On 17-11-15, 12:06, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> Register passive cooling devices when initialising cpufreq on >> big.LITTLE systems. If the device tree provides a dynamic power >> coefficient for the CPUs then the bound cooling device will support >> the extensions that allow

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

On 18-11-15, 13:33, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Thanks for the Ack. > > Will you or Rafael be picking up the series or do they need to go via > arm-soc? Rafael will pick this up, it should go via PM tree. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

Viresh Kumar writes: > On 17-11-15, 12:06, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> Register passive cooling devices when initialising cpufreq on >> big.LITTLE systems. If the device tree provides a dynamic power >> coefficient for the CPUs then the bound cooling device will support >>

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

On 17-11-15, 12:06, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Register passive cooling devices when initialising cpufreq on > big.LITTLE systems. If the device tree provides a dynamic power > coefficient for the CPUs then the bound cooling device will support > the extensions that allow it to be used with all the

[PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

Register passive cooling devices when initialising cpufreq on big.LITTLE systems. If the device tree provides a dynamic power coefficient for the CPUs then the bound cooling device will support the extensions that allow it to be used with all the existing thermal governors including the power

[PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

Register passive cooling devices when initialising cpufreq on big.LITTLE systems. If the device tree provides a dynamic power coefficient for the CPUs then the bound cooling device will support the extensions that allow it to be used with all the existing thermal governors including the power

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: arm_big_little: Add support to register a cpufreq cooling device

On 17-11-15, 12:06, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Register passive cooling devices when initialising cpufreq on > big.LITTLE systems. If the device tree provides a dynamic power > coefficient for the CPUs then the bound cooling device will support > the extensions that allow it to be used with all the