l@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate irq_chip for muiltiple
> PLIC
> instances
>
> On 2020-05-16 17:38, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Marc Zyngier
>
> [...]
>
> >> I *have* giv
On 2020-05-16 17:38, Anup Patel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Zyngier
[...]
I *have* given you a way to implement that in a better way. But again,
I'd
rather you *don't* do it for the reason I have outlined above.
I explored kernel/irq/proc.c and we can achieve what this
l@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate irq_chip for muiltiple
> PLIC
> instances
>
> On 2020-05-16 14:01, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Marc Zyngier
> >> Sent: 16 May 2020 17:59
>
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate irq_chip for
muiltiple PLIC
instances
On 2020-05-16 07:39, Anup Patel wrote:
> To distinguish interrupts from multiple PLIC instances, we use a
> per-PLIC irq_chip instance with a different name.
>
> Signed-off-by
l@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate irq_chip for muiltiple
> PLIC
> instances
>
> On 2020-05-16 07:39, Anup Patel wrote:
> > To distinguish interrupts from multiple PLIC instances, we use a
> > per-PLIC irq_chip instance wi
On 2020-05-16 07:39, Anup Patel wrote:
To distinguish interrupts from multiple PLIC instances, we use a
per-PLIC irq_chip instance with a different name.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 28 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13
6 matches
Mail list logo
