Hi!!
I wanna install Bind on my DNS. Which Bind version is most stabel and
secure.
Regards,
Nauman Ansari
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:55:28PM -0600, Paul Cassella wrote:
> > write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
> Would it be possible to provide a compiling test case that shows these
> errors ?
The CVS version (perhaps even
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:35:32PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> BTW Al: We have another general vfs/fs problem to handle - which
> is exceeding max file sizes on limited file systems. Pretty much
> nobody is getting it right. Ext2 can be
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > Add UnlockPage(page) at the end of ramfs_writepage().
> > > Shit. You are quite fast. Works.
> >
> > Sure, especially considering the fact that patch was sent to
> > Linus about a month ago (several times, actually)... ;-/
>
> Its in all the
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> On my Sony PictureBook PCG-C1VN, 2.4.0 hangs in the boot
> process while 2.4.0-prerelease boots just fine. At first I thought
> the problem was devfs-related, but skipping devfsd just caused the
> hang to occur a little later, this time in
I would like to perform more PCMCIA/Cardbus testing
on a wider array of systems. I am considering buying
a Ratoc Cardbus PC Adapter (model number CBS51U).
Here are the specs:
PCI-CardBus Bridge adapter board
Allows CardBus PC Cards to be shared by both portable and desktop PC.
I tested the 2.4.0 kernel and it reported a wrong volume size for
ntfs partitions. The size of the partition (as reported by df -k) was
a factor of 8 too high. After some searching I found that
super.c in /usr/src/linux/fs/ntfs was changed. In my previous kernel
2.2.16 a division by the number
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 01:16:27 -0600 (CST)
From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Would it be more helpful if I were to check something like
socki_lookup(file->f_dentry->f_inode)->ops == tcp_prot
instead?
No, helpful would be for you to present us with a test case program
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:55:28 -0600 (CST)
>From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[1.] One line summary of the problem:
>
>write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
>
> What you describe I can only
Date:Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:12:21 -0700
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://grok.yi.org/~greear/hashed_dev.png
(If you can't get to it, let me know and I'll email it to you...some
cable modem networks have I firewalled.)
It just seems that this shows that the
I've a 3CCFE575CT card. It is work fine in 2.2.18 kernel.
But when I change to kernel 2.4.0, I found it could not detect as 2.2.18.
I've report to pcmcia-cs maintainer, he suggest me to report this to here.
#--
By:
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:43:03 -0800, mull wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:26:55PM -, Craig Freeze wrote:
>> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>> SCSI hangs with aic7xxx in 2.4.0 SMP
>>
>> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>> SCSI device errors and bus resets observed
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > -ac has the rather extended ramfs with resource limits and stuff. That one
> > > also has rather more extended bugs 8). AFAIK none of those are in the
> vanilla
See a pretty graph showing performance of ifconfig and ip
both with and without my device-hashed-lookup patch:
http://grok.yi.org/~greear/hashed_dev.png
(If you can't get to it, let me know and I'll email it to you...some
cable modem networks have I firewalled.)
I ran ifconfig -a and ip addr
Hi,
I tried to time events inside the kernel in 2.4.0test12:
Basically the same code works fine in 2.2.18 with about 1us jitter.
However in 2.4.0test12 the jitter is around 600ms!
What I did is this: I modified the interrupt routine of the serial
driver to get a precision time-stamp via
Sounds somewhat familiar. The pump that came with RedHat 6.2 never worked
correctly at work, but dhcpcd worked just fine (we don't have static IP
addresses, but there are fewer machines than there are addresses in the pool,
so effectively, we do :-). The odd thing is that I (mis?)understood in
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Who says that it names a device? It names interfaces.
> There are good reasons to have names for ifas, and I see no really good
> convincing reasons not to put these names into the interface name space.
> (in addition it'll save a lot of people a lot of
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:55:28PM -0600, Paul Cassella wrote:
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>
> write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
Would it be possible to provide a compiling test case that shows these
errors ?
Also over what interface do you
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:12:09PM +1300, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:32:14AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> I think it would be better to keep it. The ifa based alias
> interface emulation adds minor overhead (currently it's only a
> few lines of code, assuming
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote:
> Dan Hollis wrote:
> > See Rowan v. United States Post Office.
> Why necessarily should I care about United States Post Office
> or United States in general ?
I suspect canadian law has similar precedents.
> > *Your* right to free speech stops at *my*
Date:Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:55:28 -0600 (CST)
From: Paul Cassella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
What you describe I can only say is "impossible".
There are only four cases when _ANY_
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, dep wrote:
> for what it's worth:
>
> this afternoon i conducted an experiment: i copied everything that
> was newer from
> [xfree-4.02-sourcedir]/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel
> to my [linux-2.4.0-sourcedir]/drivers/char/drm and then built a
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > If this is really true, 2.5.x is an appropriate time to make
> > this, no sooner.
>
> I think it would be better to keep it. The ifa based alias interface
> emulation adds minor overhead (currently it's only a few lines of code,
> assuming we need named
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Matt Beland wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2001 21:24, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > > You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
> > >
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> Richard is asking for source code. Documentation/Changes only gives the
> location of binaries.
>
> This is a bit of a problem IMO (I also tried, and failed, to find the egcs
> 1.1.2 source code). Now that I know where it is, I'll soon post a patch
>
Hello,
While compiling 2.4.0-ac4, I receivied the
following..Looks like a typo...Patch is also below.
Regards,
Frank
inode.c: In function
`qnx4_read_super':inode.c:372: `sb' undeclared (first use in this
function)inode.c:372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
Every once in a while I have a very frustrating problem develop. All tty
handling stops. Packets flow in and out of the machine fine, but anything
with a tty halts. I don't know exactly what is happening but I have found
that killing the last user that logged in (all his processes) usually
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 09:29:29PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote:
>> The application is some mathematics computations (modular symbols) using a
>> package called MAGMA; at times this requires very large matrices. The
>> RSS
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:24:16PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > > You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
> > > barriers to a minority expressing speech that is unacceptable to
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
write() returns -1 and sets errno non-sensically. 2.4.0{,-ac[23]}
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
write() sometimes returns -1 and sets errno to one of
1 (EPERM: "Operation not permitted")
3 (ESRCH: "No such process")
8 (ENOEXEC: "Exec
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 09:29:29PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> The application is some mathematics computations (modular symbols) using a
> package called MAGMA; at times this requires very large matrices. The
> RSS can get up to 870MB; for some reason a MAGMA process under linux
> thinks it
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Robert Wienholt, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Gentlemen,
> >
> > I was looking through some of the memory management code today and
> > came across something that may provide a minor performance boost. I have
> > included a patch below for the 2.4.0 source.
> >
> > In the
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 04:01:04AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 01:13:08 +1300
>From: Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>OK, I'm a liar -- bind does handle this. Cool.
>
> Standard BSD allows it, what do you expect :-)
>
>This is good news, because
On Sunday, January 7, 20001, Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now if 2.4 has worse _performance_ than 2.2 due to one reason or
> another, that I'd like to hear about ;)
Well, here is a workload that performs worse on 2.4.0 than on 2.2.19pre,
and as it is the usual workload on my
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
> > > None of the named compilers gripe? Where, prey tell, do I get the source-
> > > code of a compiler that works? The only source provided in the site
> > > listed in
Actually, I have another reason for using patch-kernel, besides being
inexperienced or lazy: being weird. :-) For some reason, I have an aversion
to downloading complete kernels, and just grab the patches. That's usually OK,
because I apply each patch one at a time, within a few hours after
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Robert Wienholt, Jr. wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I was looking through some of the memory management code today and
> came across something that may provide a minor performance boost. I have
> included a patch below for the 2.4.0 source.
>
> In the find_vma
Hi all,
Has anybody written any support for HDLC normal response mode. I could only
find the support of HDLC asynchronous balanced mode (LAPB).
Any pointers will highly be appreciated.
Thanks,
Anil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Gentlemen,
I was looking through some of the memory management code today and
came across something that may provide a minor performance boost. I have
included a patch below for the 2.4.0 source.
In the find_vma function a cached vma is checked and if that is
not the requested
As per usual, when sending a mail with an attachment, I forgot to
attach it after I :wq'd.
--
Jeremy M. Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP key = http://turbogeek.org/openpgp-key
OpenPGP fingerprint = 494C 7A6E 19FB 026A 1F52 E0D5 5C5D 6228 DC43 3DEE
diff -rub
On Sunday 07 January 2001 21:24, Dan Hollis wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
>
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
> > barriers to a minority expressing speech that
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:24:16PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
> > barriers to a minority expressing speech that is unacceptable to the
> > majority. This is not acceptable.
>
> See
Dag Wieers caught all the double word's in Configure.help (from the
looks of the patch we're quite a bunch of stutterers), here's another
patch that catches mainly some combined words, a '2.3' -> '2.4', and
inproper capitalizations.
Also, two of the translation's for Configure.help have stale
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:11:40PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> this issue was discussed on the netdev mailing list a few weeks
> back.
>
> It's very unfortunate that the web archives of netdev
> stopped working several months ago and there now appears
> to be no web archive of [EMAIL
Ingo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:43:54AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2000, Mike Sklar wrote:
> > > If I wanted to adjust the rlim_cur value of a running
> > > processes, is there any sort of interface for that?
> >
> > Hmmm, I don't think there is an interface to
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:56:56AM +0100, Rafal Maszkowski wrote:
> Pure 2.4.0 on sparc32 with RedHat 6.2:
> root@etest:/usr/src/6,0# modprobe fore200e
> /lib/modules/2.4.0lt/kernel/drivers/atm/fore200e_sba_fw.o: couldn't find the kernel
>version the module was compiled for
>
Even not specifically disagreeing, but
Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> See Rowan v. United States Post Office.
Why necessarily should I care about United States Post Office
or United States in general ?
>
>
> *Your* right to free speech stops at *my* property.
>
> Under no circumstances does your right
jamal wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
>
> > Hrm, what if they just made each IP-SEC interface a net_device? If they
> > are a routable entity, with it's own IP address, it starts to look a lot
> > like an interface/net_device.
>
> As in my response to Matti, i thing a
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> You are suggesting that it is acceptable to implement technological
> barriers to a minority expressing speech that is unacceptable to the
> majority. This is not acceptable.
See Rowan v. United States Post Office.
*Your* right to free speech stops
On Sun, Jan 07 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
>
> This debugging check should probably be removed around
> 2.4.5, in the mean time it is much too useful to track
> down badly behaving device drivers ;)
It need not be a badly written driver, it could be a
Anyone get this working? If so please tell me the version of you APM utilities
and what Power Management options you have on in the kernel.
Ever since I started trying 2.3.x, as soon as the box gets a change in it's
power status (even just an update of the % battery) Linux locks solid. It's 100%
This is very easily repeated... happens a few minutes after boot. After it
happens one CPU gets stuck on a spin lock owned by the other.
This kernel was built from code pulled down from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/vger on Jan
5th. Looked like the first merge of the 2.4.0 released code... but the Ooops
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Adam J. Richter wrote:
>
> This sounds like a bug that I posted a fix for a long time ago.
> cramfs calls bforget on the superblock area, destroying that block of
> the ramdisk, even when the ramdisk does not contain a cramfs file system.
> Normally, bforget is called
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:30:14PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:22:28PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > I already run several sugarplum sites with teergrubes. I also use
> > various blackhole lists and take other action against spammers, including
> >
hi,
i tried 2.4.0 kernel with rmk and np patches in my brutus board. (Brutus
is a StrongArm based development environment)
my patched kernel is 2.4.0-rmk1-np1
the kernel uncompresses fine. but uncompressing the ramdisk fails. In
this instance my uncompressed ramdisk is about 3.5mb.
i looked
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:22:28PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> I already run several sugarplum sites with teergrubes. I also use
> various blackhole lists and take other action against spammers, including
> blocking entire rogue domains. If that rogue domain happens to be a two
>
Hello, this is my first post to Linux-Kernel so I hope I get this right.
On my Pentium 200 system with Intel i430VX chipset and PIIX3, my Maxtor
3.5GB IDE HD would always have DMA enabled even in 2.4.0-test10, but then
sometime between 2.4.0-test12 and 2.4.0 (final), DMA was not being enabled
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Albert Cranford wrote:
> > Could anybody with a VIA chip who has the energy please do something for
> > me:
> > - enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h
> > - do a "/sbin/lspci -xxvvv" on the interrupt routing chip (it's the
> >"ISA bridge" chip - the VIA numbers
Ok.. I'm going bananas. It could be a 4am braindeath or a rh7.0 bungholio
but this is annoying:
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int fd;
setfsuid(atoi(argv[1]));
fd = open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY);
printf("got fd %d\n", fd);
}
[root@wizball /root]# ./setfstest 0
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:42:12AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:02:40 -0800,
> A Guy Called Tyketto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm still seeing
> >
> >#include
> >
> >at line 25 of acpi_ksyms.c. This is also the same line, in
> >patch-2.4.0-ac2 (counted the
when you use SMP there's suppOsed to be one icon that shows up for
every CPU you have. 2 cpu = 2 icons, 4 cpu = 4 icon. That's what the for
loop in fbcon_show_logo().
So this really isnt a bug, depending on how you look at it. It's
definitely something the lpp author needs to account for.
On
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Matthias Juchem wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Comparing the Changes document for 2.4.0 against the one from 2.3.11 one
> can see that many requirements were removed. Nine out of 22 are still
> there.
> Have the removed ones been unnecessary or only less important than the
>
Hi, all,
I am new to this maillist. I want to boot my system
from a single floppy. If I use 1.44MB, the space
is too small. So I format my floppy to 1.6MB.
I do the following things,
#fdformat /dev/fd0H1600
#cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/zImage /dev/fd0
#rdev /dev/fd0 /dev/fd0
#rdev -r
Patrick Mau wrote:
[...]
> And here's the question:
> I would like to collect statistics for eth0:0 but obviously the
> pakets are only counted for the real interface. If I had enough time
> and knowledge, how should I implement paket counters for aliased
> interfaces ?
>
> PS: Am I right that
On 7 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >In supplement to Evan Thompson's emails with the subject "Additional
> >info. for PCI VIA IDE crazyness. Please read." I've noticed the
> >following message with recent 2.4.0
Handle with care. I think the fs updates are right but I don't guarantee it.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.0-ac4
o Fix dereference of freed skbuff in iphase (Hans Grobler)
o Fix dereference of freed skbuff in isdn_ppp (Hans Grobler)
o
This fixes a comment at the end of an #endif. This should fix all of
the warnings about tokens at the end of #endifs. Please disregard
the parts of my earlier patch which made changes to comments
and .S files. I should have reviewed the patch the script made
more closely.
diff -urN -X
Alan Cox wrote:
> > Um, what about people running their box as just a VLAN router/firewall?
> > That seems to be one of the principle uses so far. Actually, in that case
> > both VLAN and IP traffic would come through, so it would be a tie if VLAN
> > came first, but non-vlan traffic would
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Could anybody with a VIA chip who has the energy please do something for
> me:
> - enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h
> - do a "/sbin/lspci -xxvvv" on the interrupt routing chip (it's the
>"ISA bridge" chip - the VIA numbers are 82c586, 82c596, the PCI
>
Pure 2.4.0 on sparc32 with RedHat 6.2:
root@etest:/usr/src/6,0# modprobe fore200e
/lib/modules/2.4.0lt/kernel/drivers/atm/fore200e_sba_fw.o: couldn't find the kernel
version the module was compiled for
/lib/modules/2.4.0lt/kernel/drivers/atm/fore200e_sba_fw.o: insmod
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:31:11PM -0700, Matt Beland wrote:
> Thereby killing how many hundreds of innocent people? China doesn't much
> believe in fining minor offenders, remember.
> You don't like Spam? Join the club. Blacklisting any domain - ANY domain -
> for spamming, unless you can
Matthias Juchem wrote:
> BTW, lots of version dependencies found in older Changes document (i.e.
> for 2.3.11) were removed now (2.4.0 shows only 9 where the old one had
> 22). Have the removed ones been completely unnecessary?
Quoting from 2.4.0's Changes file:
[snip]
> trying life on the
Hi Chris,
Comparing the Changes document for 2.4.0 against the one from 2.3.11 one
can see that many requirements were removed. Nine out of 22 are still
there.
Have the removed ones been unnecessary or only less important than the
remaining ones?
Regards,
Matthias
-
To unsubscribe from this
> Could anybody with a VIA chip who has the energy please do something for
> me:
> - enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h
> - do a "/sbin/lspci -xxvvv" on the interrupt routing chip (it's the
>"ISA bridge" chip - the VIA numbers are 82c586, 82c596, the PCI
>numbers for them are
I've put a patch up for testing on the kernel.org mirrors:
/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.0-1.diff.gz
It provides a framework for zerocopy transmits and delayed
receive fragment coalescing. TUX-1.01 uses this framework.
Zerocopy transmit requires some driver support, things run
On 7 Jan 2001, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Why don't you, as the other script suggested, execute libc.so.6?
> Symlinks can be missing or can be wrong.
I'll have a look at this shell script and take the best out of both to
make a new one.
BTW, lots of version dependencies found in older Changes
On Sunday 07 January 2001 18:22, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:27:45PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > 99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
> > > numbering .com or
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 5)
> # glibc versions. Take the last symbolic link,
> # extract the version number from the file it points to.
> if [ `expr "X$1" : 'Xl'` -eq 2 ]
>
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:27:45PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > 99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
> > numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in China - the TLD of
> >
Hi,
Apoligies in advance if this is not the right place to send this
report.
When displaying a screen-wide icon in the frame buffer for the
graphics console:
Linux version 2.4.0
Console Drivers
Video mode selection support
Support for frame buffer devices (EXPERMENTAL)
VESA VGA
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 16:19:50 -0500,
"Rich Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This patch should fix the rest of the warnings about #endif
>statements when using the 20001225 gcc snapshot. Thanks to
>Keith Owens for providing a script to automate this process. It got
>the job done sooner and
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:02:40 -0800,
A Guy Called Tyketto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm still seeing
>
>#include
>
>at line 25 of acpi_ksyms.c. This is also the same line, in
>patch-2.4.0-ac2 (counted the lines of each). Neither patches compile from this.
Not happening here. -ac2
Hello,
I would like to use IP-Aliasing to create a private network
between a few machines without buying more hardware. That's
easy, but ifconfig tells me:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
inet addr:x.x.x.x Bcast:x.x.x.x Mask:x.x.x.x
UP BROADCAST
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
> Hrm, what if they just made each IP-SEC interface a net_device? If they
> are a routable entity, with it's own IP address, it starts to look a lot
> like an interface/net_device.
As in my response to Matti, i thing a netdevice is a generalized link
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 06:16:15PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> 99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
> numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in China - the TLD of
> protestors and disidents). Half of what's left comes from either .kr
> or .br.
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 06:43:14 -0800,
David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Matthias Juchem wrote:
>> My script is intended for the one who likes to provide bug reports but is
>> too lazy to look up all the information or simply is not sure about what
>> to include.
>
>Why can't it be done in sh?
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:53:16PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote:
> Only on my company's e-mail server. My company typically gets "zero"
> emails from outside the US. If I get a piece of spam (sorry they are
> typically from outside the US), I just block the entire .com.br domain.
> I get far
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:10:52PM -0500, jamal wrote:
> > OK. I suppose an skb->vlan_tag is passed to the driver and it will know
> > what to do with it (pass it on a descriptor etc).
>
> Sure, nice. WHY SHOULD THERE BE MORE LAYER-2 STUFF ADDED
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> 99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
> numbering .com or .net. The .org is frowned upon in China - the TLD of
> protestors and disidents). Half of what's left comes from either .kr
> or .br. I'm fully in favor of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> this looks like a typo and fixes a compile error in
> 2.4.0-ac3.
(replacing temp_sze with temp_size in drivers/video/vesafb.c)
I had this problem too.
For some reason this patch kept getting rejected by the patch program when I
tried to apply it, but editing the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In supplement to Evan Thompson's emails with the subject "Additional
>info. for PCI VIA IDE crazyness. Please read." I've noticed the
>following message with recent 2.4.0 test + release kernels:
>
>IRQ routing conflict
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> It seems that for one reason or another, ip_conntrack totally locks (not
> removeable) after about 10 hours of continued use. All i found were
> these messages in my dmesg output
What was the contents of /proc/net/ip_conntrack?
Being unremovable can
The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
Release 0.9.1: Sun Jan 7 18:05:36 EST 2001
* Synchronized with 2.4.0 final.
* Fixed bugs in handling of -W and -D flags.
* "source" pathnames are now evaluated relative relative to the
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:03:19AM +0100, Pedro M. Rodrigues wrote:
>Lucky b*st*rd! ;-) My spam is mostly from USA. Just deleted 78
> of those, and only 7 seemed to be from abroad. I wish i could block
> .com ... ;-)
99% of mine is from China (either *.cn or 163.com or some other
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:57:08PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 04:32:25 -0800,
> A Guy Called Tyketto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/acpi'
> >gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
>
hi,
On Jan 5, 3:51pm, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Subject: Re: More better in mount(2)
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > ...
> > > This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
> > > strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do
Lucky b*st*rd! ;-) My spam is mostly from USA. Just deleted 78
of those, and only 7 seemed to be from abroad. I wish i could block
.com ... ;-)
Pedro
On 7 Jan 2001, at 17:53, John O'Donnell wrote:
> Only on my company's e-mail server. My company typically gets "zero"
> emails from
Only on my company's e-mail server. My company typically gets "zero"
emails from outside the US. If I get a piece of spam (sorry they are
typically from outside the US), I just block the entire .com.br domain.
I get far less SPAM now! I cannot express how much I loathe SPAM!
I have taken this
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
> > None of the named compilers gripe? Where, prey tell, do I get the source-
> > code of a compiler that works? The only source provided in the site
> > listed in the Documentation does not.
>
> It's not the only
On 7 Jan, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Um, what about people running their box as just a VLAN router/firewall?
>> That seems to be one of the principle uses so far. Actually, in that case
>> both VLAN and IP traffic would come through, so it would be a tie if VLAN
>> came first, but non-vlan traffic
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
