On Tuesday, August 28 2007 12:45:50 pm Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
> > problem then how about the patch below?
>
> I don't think it is.
>
> > -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel,
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
> problem then how about the patch below?
I don't think it is.
> -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO,
On Tuesday, August 28 2007 2:46:19 am Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 00:01 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> > +P: Paul Moore
> > +M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > +L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > +S: Maintained
> > +
>
>
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 00:01 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> +P: Paul Moore
> +M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +S: Maintained
> +
Aren't there now 2 subsystems in MAINTAINERS for the same thing?
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 00:01 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
+NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
+P: Paul Moore
+M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+S: Maintained
+
Aren't there now 2 subsystems in MAINTAINERS for the same thing?
NETLABEL
On Tuesday, August 28 2007 2:46:19 am Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 00:01 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
+NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
+P: Paul Moore
+M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+S: Maintained
+
Aren't there now 2
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
problem then how about the patch below?
I don't think it is.
-NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
+NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO,
On Tuesday, August 28 2007 12:45:50 pm Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
problem then how about the patch below?
I don't think it is.
-NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO,
8 matches
Mail list logo