On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> huh. Seems this is not really good idea, because MISC Irq will be
> triggered for *any* CPTS event and there is no way to enable it just for
> HW_TS_PUSH.
So what? That is not a problem.
> So, this doesn't work will with
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> huh. Seems this is not really good idea, because MISC Irq will be
> triggered for *any* CPTS event and there is no way to enable it just for
> HW_TS_PUSH.
So what? That is not a problem.
> So, this doesn't work will with
On 12/03/2016 05:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> This also change overflow polling period when HW_TS_PUSH feature is
>> enabled - overflow check work will be scheduled more often (every
>> 200ms) for proper HW_TS_PUSH events
On 12/03/2016 05:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> This also change overflow polling period when HW_TS_PUSH feature is
>> enabled - overflow check work will be scheduled more often (every
>> 200ms) for proper HW_TS_PUSH events
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> This also change overflow polling period when HW_TS_PUSH feature is
> enabled - overflow check work will be scheduled more often (every
> 200ms) for proper HW_TS_PUSH events reporting.
For proper reporting, you should make use
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> This also change overflow polling period when HW_TS_PUSH feature is
> enabled - overflow check work will be scheduled more often (every
> 200ms) for proper HW_TS_PUSH events reporting.
For proper reporting, you should make use
On 11/30/2016 05:08 AM, Jan Lübbe wrote:
> On Mo, 2016-11-28 at 17:04 -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> This patch adds support of the CPTS HW_TS_PUSH events which are generated
>> by external low frequency time stamp channels on TI's OMAP CPSW and
>> Keystone 2 platforms. It supports up to 8
On 11/30/2016 05:08 AM, Jan Lübbe wrote:
> On Mo, 2016-11-28 at 17:04 -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> This patch adds support of the CPTS HW_TS_PUSH events which are generated
>> by external low frequency time stamp channels on TI's OMAP CPSW and
>> Keystone 2 platforms. It supports up to 8
On Mo, 2016-11-28 at 17:04 -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> This patch adds support of the CPTS HW_TS_PUSH events which are generated
> by external low frequency time stamp channels on TI's OMAP CPSW and
> Keystone 2 platforms. It supports up to 8 external time stamp channels for
> HW_TS_PUSH
On Mo, 2016-11-28 at 17:04 -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> This patch adds support of the CPTS HW_TS_PUSH events which are generated
> by external low frequency time stamp channels on TI's OMAP CPSW and
> Keystone 2 platforms. It supports up to 8 external time stamp channels for
> HW_TS_PUSH
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> +/* HW TS */
> +static int cpts_extts_enable(struct cpts *cpts, u32 index, int on)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 v;
> +
> + if (index >= cpts->info.n_ext_ts)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + if
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:04:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> +/* HW TS */
> +static int cpts_extts_enable(struct cpts *cpts, u32 index, int on)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 v;
> +
> + if (index >= cpts->info.n_ext_ts)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + if
This patch adds support of the CPTS HW_TS_PUSH events which are generated
by external low frequency time stamp channels on TI's OMAP CPSW and
Keystone 2 platforms. It supports up to 8 external time stamp channels for
HW_TS_PUSH input pins (the number of supported channel is different for
different
This patch adds support of the CPTS HW_TS_PUSH events which are generated
by external low frequency time stamp channels on TI's OMAP CPSW and
Keystone 2 platforms. It supports up to 8 external time stamp channels for
HW_TS_PUSH input pins (the number of supported channel is different for
different
14 matches
Mail list logo