Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:02:04PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > > Am 03.07.2017 um 14:23 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > > > Hi Hugues, > > > >> Am 03.07.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : > >> > >> Hi

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:02:04PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > > Am 03.07.2017 um 14:23 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > > > Hi Hugues, > > > >> Am 03.07.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : > >> > >> Hi Nikolaus, > >> > >> nothing really strange in

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Sakari, > Am 03.07.2017 um 14:23 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > Hi Hugues, > >> Am 03.07.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : >> >> Hi Nikolaus, >> >> nothing really strange in trace, I wanted to check the latest S_FMT and >> it is well

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Sakari, > Am 03.07.2017 um 14:23 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > Hi Hugues, > >> Am 03.07.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : >> >> Hi Nikolaus, >> >> nothing really strange in trace, I wanted to check the latest S_FMT and >> it is well 1280x1024 YUV: [ 425.579498] video2:

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 03.07.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : > > Hi Nikolaus, > > nothing really strange in trace, I wanted to check the latest S_FMT and > it is well 1280x1024 YUV: >>> [ 425.579498] video2: VIDIOC_S_FMT: type=vid-cap, width=1280, > height=1024,

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 03.07.2017 um 14:03 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : > > Hi Nikolaus, > > nothing really strange in trace, I wanted to check the latest S_FMT and > it is well 1280x1024 YUV: >>> [ 425.579498] video2: VIDIOC_S_FMT: type=vid-cap, width=1280, > height=1024, pixelformat=UYVY, field=none,

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, nothing really strange in trace, I wanted to check the latest S_FMT and it is well 1280x1024 YUV: >> [ 425.579498] video2: VIDIOC_S_FMT: type=vid-cap, width=1280, height=1024, pixelformat=UYVY, field=none, bytesperline=2560, sizeimage=2621440, colorspace=0, flags=0x0,

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, nothing really strange in trace, I wanted to check the latest S_FMT and it is well 1280x1024 YUV: >> [ 425.579498] video2: VIDIOC_S_FMT: type=vid-cap, width=1280, height=1024, pixelformat=UYVY, field=none, bytesperline=2560, sizeimage=2621440, colorspace=0, flags=0x0,

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 03.07.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : > > Hi Nikolaus, > Could you enable V4L2 UAPI traces ? Something like: > echo 0xFF > /sys/devices/platform/soc/. name>/video4linux/video2/dev_debug > > you will see then in kernel dmesg the V4L2 calls and their

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 03.07.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Hugues FRUCHET : > > Hi Nikolaus, > Could you enable V4L2 UAPI traces ? Something like: > echo 0xFF > /sys/devices/platform/soc/. name>/video4linux/video2/dev_debug > > you will see then in kernel dmesg the V4L2 calls and their > parameters/return

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, Could you enable V4L2 UAPI traces ? Something like: echo 0xFF > /sys/devices/platform/soc/./video4linux/video2/dev_debug you will see then in kernel dmesg the V4L2 calls and their parameters/return values. BR, Hugues. On 07/01/2017 11:00 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, Could you enable V4L2 UAPI traces ? Something like: echo 0xFF > /sys/devices/platform/soc/./video4linux/video2/dev_debug you will see then in kernel dmesg the V4L2 calls and their parameters/return values. BR, Hugues. On 07/01/2017 11:00 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi, Firstly, it turned out that we also must have V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE for omap3isp compatibility (see https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?=0bc77f3f06fcf2ca7b7fad782d70926cd4d235f1 ). And secondly, I have tried to add some SXGA config and it looks good by

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi, Firstly, it turned out that we also must have V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE for omap3isp compatibility (see https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?=0bc77f3f06fcf2ca7b7fad782d70926cd4d235f1 ). And secondly, I have tried to add some SXGA config and it looks good by

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, I would propose to work first on YUV support, so you can test a YUV VGA grabbing using your OMPA3 setup, I will add this support then in patch serie. For the co-work, let's continue on IRC (irc.freenode.net), chat #v4l, my pseudo is "hfr". BR, Hugues. On 06/26/2017 06:28 PM, H.

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, I would propose to work first on YUV support, so you can test a YUV VGA grabbing using your OMPA3 setup, I will add this support then in patch serie. For the co-work, let's continue on IRC (irc.freenode.net), chat #v4l, my pseudo is "hfr". BR, Hugues. On 06/26/2017 06:28 PM, H.

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

> Am 26.06.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >>> You may want to try this one: >>> >>> commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef >>> Author: Pavel >>> Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 >>> >>> omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

> Am 26.06.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >>> You may want to try this one: >>> >>> commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef >>> Author: Pavel >>> Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 >>> >>> omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not preview) works >>> >>> This

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Nikolaus, some comments about pixel format/resolution below: On 06/26/2017 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Nikolaus, some comments about pixel format/resolution below: On 06/26/2017 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no image :(

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi! > > You may want to try this one: > > > > commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef > > Author: Pavel > > Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 > > > >omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not preview) works > > > >This is neccessary for capture (not preview)

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi! > > You may want to try this one: > > > > commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef > > Author: Pavel > > Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 > > > >omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not preview) works > > > >This is neccessary for capture (not preview) to work

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, On 06/22/2017 05:41 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > >> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : >> >> This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. >> >> OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board >> plugged on connector P1 of

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Nikolaus, On 06/22/2017 05:41 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > >> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : >> >> This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. >> >> OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board >> plugged on connector P1 of STM32F746G-DISCO board.

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Pavel, > Am 26.06.2017 um 10:39 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no image :( The

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Pavel, > Am 26.06.2017 um 10:39 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no image :( The latter is likely a setup issue

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > > > Hi! > > > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( > >> > >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = > >> Image

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > > > Hi! > > > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( > >> > >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = > >> Image Signal Processor)

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Pavel, > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( >> >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = >> Image Signal Processor) which >> we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Pavel, > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( >> >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = >> Image Signal Processor) which >> we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals on the

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 23.06.2017 um 12:25 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > Hi Hugues, > >> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:41 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : >> >> >>> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : >>> >>> This patchset enables

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 23.06.2017 um 12:25 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > Hi Hugues, > >> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:41 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : >> >> >>> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : >>> >>> This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. >>> >>> OV9655 support has been tested

omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi! > * unfortunately we still get no image :( > > The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = Image > Signal Processor) which > we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals on the interface > indicated that signals and > sync are correct. But we do not

omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi! > * unfortunately we still get no image :( > > The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = Image > Signal Processor) which > we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals on the interface > indicated that signals and > sync are correct. But we do not

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 22.06.2017 um 17:41 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > >> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : >> >> This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. >> >> OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board >>

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

Hi Hugues, > Am 22.06.2017 um 17:41 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > >> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : >> >> This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. >> >> OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board >> plugged on connector P1 of STM32F746G-DISCO

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : > > This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. > > OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board > plugged on connector P1 of STM32F746G-DISCO board. > Due to lack of OV9650/52 hardware support, the

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

> Am 22.06.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Hugues Fruchet : > > This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. > > OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board > plugged on connector P1 of STM32F746G-DISCO board. > Due to lack of OV9650/52 hardware support, the modified related code

[PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board plugged on connector P1 of STM32F746G-DISCO board. Due to lack of OV9650/52 hardware support, the modified related code could not have been checked for non-regression. First patches

[PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

This patchset enables OV9655 camera support. OV9655 support has been tested using STM32F4DIS-CAM extension board plugged on connector P1 of STM32F746G-DISCO board. Due to lack of OV9650/52 hardware support, the modified related code could not have been checked for non-regression. First patches