David Miller wrote:
From: Brock Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:30:58 -0600
Is this going to be merged anytime soon?
If it gets submitted to the proper mailing list, it might.
'linux-net' is for user questions, it is not where the networking
developers hang out, 'netdev'
David Miller wrote:
From: Brock Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:30:58 -0600
Is this going to be merged anytime soon?
If it gets submitted to the proper mailing list, it might.
'linux-net' is for user questions, it is not where the networking
developers hang out,
Corey Hickey wrote:
The most recent ESFQ patches are getting stale, and I have received a
few requests to update them to a current kernel release. Instead, I
added hash type selection to my most recent round of SFQ patches and
packaged them up.
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/
Is this going to be merged anytime soon?
Brock
On Feb 9, 2008 8:11 PM, Corey Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corey Hickey wrote:
The most recent ESFQ patches are getting stale, and I have received a
few requests to update them to a current kernel release. Instead, I
added hash type
Brock Noland wrote:
Is this going to be merged anytime soon?
Part of it ought to be, but first I need to:
- update my patches to recent net-2.6 git (there were major changes)
- test thoroughly
- submit for review
- wait for review
- etc.
That'll happen when I get more time in the near future.
From: Brock Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:30:58 -0600
Is this going to be merged anytime soon?
If it gets submitted to the proper mailing list, it might.
'linux-net' is for user questions, it is not where the networking
developers hang out, 'netdev' is.
And you have to post
The most recent ESFQ patches are getting stale, and I have received a
few requests to update them to a current kernel release. Instead, I
added hash type selection to my most recent round of SFQ patches and
packaged them up.
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/
