On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:16:44 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have a small network at my home, where I can test freely this
things, and is very similar of the office, but withouth the w2k3
server, so I'll try to install Zebra to route the internet, I
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:11:17 + (UTC)
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
I've setted up the bridge normally
ifconfig eth0 down
ifconfig eth1 down
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
brctl addbr
: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:15:24 -0200 Subject: Re: Network sharing
without using NAT, possible?
Actually, putting the external NIC, and pluging it in the switch was
the fastest and easy solution, I tryed the rout add -host 1.2.3.4 dev
eth1, but it didn't worked :(
On 11/22/07, xerces8 [EMAIL
Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do have a small network at my home, where I can test freely this
things, and is very similar of the office, but withouth the w2k3 server,
so I'll try to install Zebra to route the internet, I don't know if this
will work, but If I manage to make
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 + (UTC)
ifconfig eth0 down
ifconfig eth1 down
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth1
brctl stp br0 on
ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:33:09 +0100, xerces8 wrote:
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007
13:04:40 + (UTC)
ifconfig eth0 down
ifconfig eth1 down
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 eth1
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:00:29 +, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mateus Interciso wrote:
I currently using iptables NAT for routing the internet trough 2
different sub-networks, and we are having some
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:11 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
[...]
Maybe, if I explain a little more about the fisical network we have, it
may be easier to understand(or find the problem)
I think you would need a second public IP
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:28:00 -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:11 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
[...]
Maybe, if I explain a little more about the fisical network we have, it
may be easier to understand(or
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
If you want to use the internet with a 1918 address, then you will have
to stick it behind a NAT device, in your diagram it is in front. How is
the address supposed to be translated?
Windows ICS is NAT.
Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Ok, going back to the beginning... if you only have one public IP, you
will use nat. w2k3 RRAS is probably configured with rules to handle the
extra issues with the VoIP protocols... you never said which one, SIP,
IAX2, H.323, MGCP...
Linux comes blank, no iptables rules, you have to add extra
xerces8 wrote:
You can ask the ISP for more real IP addresses and then use one for the VoIP
client.
In our country*, many ISPs give 2-4 IP addresses by default.
Regards,
David
* - Slovenia
-Original Message-
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Date:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:22:29 +0100, xerces8 wrote:
You can ask the ISP for more real IP addresses and then use one for the
VoIP client.
In our country*, many ISPs give 2-4 IP addresses by default.
Regards,
David
* - Slovenia
-Original Message-
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL
You can ask the ISP for more real IP addresses and then use one for the VoIP
client.
In our country*, many ISPs give 2-4 IP addresses by default.
Regards,
David
* - Slovenia
-Original Message-
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
specially for VoIP, so I was thinking if it's possible to make a router
(like a CISCO IOS) using Zebra, that will, in other words, share the
Internet trough the sub-networks, without using NAT, or in a better way.
No, you eighter need to do NAT (aka
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 23:19 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
Hi all, I currently using iptables NAT for routing the internet trough
2
different sub-networks, and we are having some trouble with the NAT,
specially for VoIP, so I was thinking if it's possible to make a
router
(like a CISCO
Christopher Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 23:19 +, Mateus Interciso wrote:
Hi all, I currently using iptables NAT for routing the internet trough
2
different sub-networks, and we are having some trouble with the NAT,
specially for VoIP, so I was thinking if it's possible to make
Christopher Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:09 -0200, Zarnick Maelstorm wrote:
If I remember correct SIP is not very NAT friendly. I have a Sipura ATA
and it fails to work if it is nated more than once. IAX2 will work
fine. You may be using neither protocols.
I do not
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:34:11 -0500, Christopher Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:22 -0200, Zarnick Maelstorm wrote:
The problem is that I'm bound to this damn Sipura 2k, and man, is this
giving me a headache...any tips?
If I can remember I believe the problem is that the Sipura does
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:22 -0200, Zarnick Maelstorm wrote:
The problem is that I'm bound to this damn Sipura 2k, and man, is
this
giving me a headache...any tips?
If I can remember I believe the problem is that the Sipura does not know
the gateway address. If you can tell it that in config
20 matches
Mail list logo
