Hi Linus,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:48:11PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
From: Robert Marklund robert.markl...@stericsson.com
Add some basic regulator support for the power pins, as needed
by the ST-Ericsson Snowball platform that powers up the SMSC911
chip using an external regulator.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 22:33, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:48:11PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
+/*
+ * Request or free resources, currently just regulators.
+ *
+ * The SMSC911x has two power pins: vddvario and vdd33a, in designs where
+ * these are not always-on we need
From: Robert Marklund robert.markl...@stericsson.com
Add some basic regulator support for the power pins, as needed
by the ST-Ericsson Snowball platform that powers up the SMSC911
chip using an external regulator.
Platforms that use regulators and the smsc911x and have no defined
regulator for
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 14:48, Linus Walleij wrote:
Platforms that use regulators and the smsc911x and have no defined
regulator for the smsc911x and claim complete regulator
constraints with no dummy regulators will need to provide it, for
example using a fixed voltage regulator. It appears
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
my gut reaction: smsc911x is working just fine without regulator
support for many people, so why do we suddenly need to make it a
requirement ? this is a fairly small amount of code, so adding a
smsc911x Kconfig symbol to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 17:46, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
my gut reaction: smsc911x is working just fine without regulator
support for many people, so why do we suddenly need to make it a
requirement ? this is a fairly small amount of
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:59:14PM +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i saw that !CONFIG_REGULATOR works great. my concern is that these
boards don't define any regulators for smsc resources, so if
CONFIG_REGULATOR is enabled to test out unrelated daughter cards, i
don't want the network driver
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:42, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:59:14PM +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i saw that !CONFIG_REGULATOR works great. my concern is that these
boards don't define any regulators for smsc resources, so if
CONFIG_REGULATOR is enabled to test out unrelated
