Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:23:35, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
[...]
Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration.
[...]
-struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = {
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com wrote:
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
Care to propose something specific (which is viable for the -rc cycle) ?
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
* Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com [120223 08:32]:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com wrote:
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
Care to propose something specific (which is viable for the -rc cycle) ?
This is pretty much the
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:23:35, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
[...]
Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration.
[...]
-struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = { mbox_dsp_info, mbox_iva_info, NULL };
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+struct omap_mbox
