Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-03 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-02 19:00:02) On 20:35-20130402, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: On 04/02/2013 08:16 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 20:35:45) On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote: OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-02 Thread Grygorii Strashko
On 04/02/2013 06:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote: OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that mean for Andrii's patchset? Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the approach of an Super regulator controlling sub regulators,

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-02 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 13:15-20130402, Grygorii Strashko wrote: On 04/02/2013 06:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote: OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that mean for Andrii's patchset? Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the approach of

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-02 Thread Andrii Tseglytskyi
On 04/02/2013 08:16 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 20:35:45) On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote: OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that mean for Andrii's patchset? Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the approach of

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-02 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 20:35-20130402, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: On 04/02/2013 08:16 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 20:35:45) On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote: OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that mean for Andrii's patchset? Unless anyone

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-01 Thread Mike Turquette
Andrii, Sorry to nitpick further but this your replies look very non-standard. Typically a right chevron and a space is used to indent replies instead of a tab. Something like this: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette#Reply_Level_Indication Quoting Andrii Tseglytskyi

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-01 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org wrote: Andrii, Sorry to nitpick further but this your replies look very non-standard. Typically a right chevron and a space is used to indent replies instead of a tab. Something like this:

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-01 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 14:34-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-01 12:28:20) On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org wrote: Let's figure out what is happening to the VC/VP code first and then figure out what to do about ABB.

Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] ARM: OMAP3+: ABB: introduce ABB driver

2013-04-01 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 17:05-20130401, Mike Turquette wrote: OK, so we're in agreement on what The Future looks like. What does that mean for Andrii's patchset? Unless anyone has an fundamental issue with the approach of an Super regulator controlling sub regulators, I think, in-line with your view, we should