- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:50:09 +0200
From: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file
To: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:31:23 +1000
From: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file
To: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:55:22 +0200
From: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file
To: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Thanks for the extra details.
I still cannot manage to reproduce it which is frustrating, but I
think I can fix your array for you.
Get the source for mdadm 2.6.3, apply the following patch, then use
mdadm -A /dev/md0 --update=this /dev/sd[abcde]
that should re-write the part of the
Oct 2007 08:43:28 +0200
From: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file
To: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007
On Sunday October 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me if I'm on the right track?
I've now noticed the following:
# ~/mdadm-2.6.3/mdadm -v -A /dev/md0 /dev/sd[d-e]
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sdd is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot -1.
mdadm:
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:51:08 +1000
From: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file
To: Nagilum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Hi,
During the process of reshaping a Raid5 from 3 (/dev/sd[a-c]) to 5
devices (/dev/sd[a-e]) the system was accidentally shut down.
I know I was stupid I should have used a --backup-file but stupid me didn't.
Thanks
On Thursday October 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, after looking in Grow.c I can see that the backup file is
removed once the critial section has passed:
if (backup_file)
unlink(backup_file);
printf(Name : ... critical section
Hi,
During the process of reshaping a Raid5 from 3 (/dev/sd[a-c]) to 5
devices (/dev/sd[a-e]) the system was accidentally shut down.
I know I was stupid I should have used a --backup-file but stupid me didn't.
Thanks for not rubbing it any further. :(
Ok, here is what I have:
nas:~# uname -a
10 matches
Mail list logo