On 6 Sep 2006, Mario Holbe spake:
You don't necessarily need one. However, since Neil considers in-kernel
RAID-autodetection a bad thing and since mdadm typically relies on
mdadm.conf for RAID-assembly
You can specify the UUID on the command-line too (although I don't).
The advantage of the
On 5 Sep 2006, Paul Waldo uttered the following:
What about bitmaps? Nobody has mentioned them. It is my
understanding that you just turn them on with mdadm /dev/mdX -b
internal. Any caveats for this?
Notably, how many additional writes does it incur? I have some RAID
arrays using drives
On 9/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what I want to do is:
* Mark the synced spare drive as working and in position 1
* Assemble the array without the unsynced spare and check if this
provides consistent data
* If it didnt, I want to mark the synced spare as working
I have two hard drives installed in this DELL GX110 Optiplex computer. I
believe that they are configured in RAID5, but am not certain. Is there a
graphical method of determining how many drives are being used and how they
are configured???
I'm using Debian, 'Sarge'...
The computer is incrediby
On 9/9/06, Richard Scobie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I have a RAID 10, comprising a RAID 0, /dev/md3 made up of RAID1,
/dev/md1 and RAID1, /dev/md2 and I do an:
echo repair /sys/block/md3/md/sync_action
will this run simultaneous repairs on the the underlying RAID 1's, or
should seperate
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Sandra L. McGrew wrote:
I have two hard drives installed in this DELL GX110 Optiplex computer. I
believe that they are configured in RAID5, but am not certain. Is there a
graphical method of determining how many drives are being used and how they
are configured???
I'm
Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Sandra L. McGrew wrote:
I have two hard drives installed in this DELL GX110 Optiplex computer. I
believe that they are configured in RAID5, but am not certain. Is
there a
graphical method of determining how many drives are being used and
how they
Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mdadm -Gb internal --bitmap-chunk=1024 /dev/md4
mdadm /dev/md4 -r /dev/sdh1
mdadm /dev/md4 -f /dev/sde1 -r /dev/sde1
mdadm --build /dev/md5 -ayes --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sde1 missing
mdadm /dev/md4 --re-add /dev/md5
mdadm /dev/md5 -a
I'm looking into the Debian, 'Sarge' Info Center and under the device column
it shows
Device TypeSizeMount Point
/dev/fd0autoN/A /media/floppy0
/dev/hda1 Ext335.9/
/dev/hdciso9660 N/A
} -Original Message-
} From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid-
} [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of berk walker
} Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 4:09 PM
} To: Justin Piszcz
} Cc: Sandra L. McGrew; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
} Subject: Re: 2 Hard Drives RAID
}
} Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Richard Scobie wrote:
To remove all doubt about what is assembled where, I though going to:
DEVICE partitions
MAILADDR root
ARRAY /dev/md3 UUID=xyz etc.
would be more secure.
Is this correct thinking on my part?
yup.
mdadm can generate it all for you... there's
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Paul Waldo wrote:
What about bitmaps? Nobody has mentioned them. It is my understanding that
you just turn them on with mdadm /dev/mdX -b internal. Any caveats for
this?
bitmaps have been working great for me on a raid5 and raid1. it makes it
that much more tolerable
12 matches
Mail list logo