Re: Urgent Problem: moving a raid - my solution

2001-02-26 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: I have two disks as raid on a BP6 (HPT366) and had one too many lockups on hde+hdg, so I decided to move it down to hdb+hdd. I could not start the raid, it just complained that the disks are not at the major/minor it expected it. The first message said that

Going from 'old' (kernel v2.2.x) to 'new' (kernel v2.4.x) raidsystem

2001-02-26 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
I'm currently running a standard v2.2.17 kernel w/ the 'accompanying' raid system (linear). Having the following /etc/mdtab file: /dev/md0linear,4k,0,75f3bcd8/dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd10 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdg1 And converted this to a newer /etc/raidtab: raiddev /dev/md0

Re: Going from 'old' (kernel v2.2.x) to 'new' (kernel v2.4.x) raidsystem

2001-02-26 Thread Neil Brown
On February 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently running a standard v2.2.17 kernel w/ the 'accompanying' raid system (linear). Having the following /etc/mdtab file: /dev/md0 linear,4k,0,75f3bcd8/dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd10 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdg1 And converted

Re: partitions for RAID volumes?

2001-02-26 Thread Luca Berra
[I'll Cc the lvm-devel list on this] Neil, what you are stating here is a bit distressing, since i am using LVM over raid5. I'd like to help in solving this kind of problems... On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:04:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Thursday February 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[lvm-devel] Re: partitions for RAID volumes?

2001-02-26 Thread Andreas Dilger
Luca Berra writes: On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:04:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: On Thursday February 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Sorry about the delay in replying, but as this mail was not addressed to me ("neilb" did not appear in headers) it didn't get a very high priority in my

RE: Scripts for RAID-10 and RAID-01

2001-02-26 Thread Zach Lowry
Well, perhaps I'm mistaken in my wording... I have currently what I call a 01, but perhaps it's really called a 10. It's 2 sets of 3 partitions striped into a RAID 0 set, then mirrored. So, it's striped, and then mirrored, hence 01. Now, for 10, I attempted to create 3 RAID 1 mirroes, and then