Michael Makuch wrote:
I realize this is the developers list and though I am a developer I'm
not a developer
of linux raid, but I can find no other source of answers to these questions:
Don't worry; it's a user list too.
$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 :
Marko Berg wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Marko Berg wrote:
Any suggestions on how to fix this, or what to investigate next,
would be appreciated!
I'm not sure what you're trying to fix here, everything you posted
looks sane.
I'm trying to find the missing 300 GB that, as df reports, are not
Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Marko Berg wrote:
Corey Hickey wrote:
Marko Berg wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Marko Berg wrote:
Any suggestions on how to fix this, or what to investigate next, would
be appreciated!
I'm not sure what you're trying to fix here, everything you
Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
Ok--I got moved in to my new place and am back and running on the 'net.
I sat down for a few hours and attempted to write a script to try all
possible combinations of drives...but I have to admit that I'm lost.
I have 8 drives in the array--and I can output every
Neil Brown wrote:
Ok, so the difference is CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED. If that is not
defined, the kernel locks up. There's not a lot of code under
#ifdef/#ifndef CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED, but since I'm not familiar with
any of it I don't expect trying to locate the bug on my own would be
very
Corey Hickey wrote:
When I get home (late) tonight I'll try running dd and badblocks on the
corresponding drives and partitions.
Well, I haven't been able to reproduce the problem that way. I tried the
following:
$ dd id=/dev/hda of=/dev/null
$ badblocks /dev/hda
$ badblocks -n /dev/hda
Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday February 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I have found an easily-reproducible bug in Linux 2.6.20. I have
already applied the Fix various bugs with aligned reads in RAID5
patch, and that had no effect. It appears to be related to the resync
process, and makes
Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday February 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I have found an easily-reproducible bug in Linux 2.6.20. I have
already applied the Fix various bugs with aligned reads in RAID5
patch, and that had no effect. It appears to be related to the resync
process, and makes
I think I have found an easily-reproducible bug in Linux 2.6.20. I have
already applied the Fix various bugs with aligned reads in RAID5
patch, and that had no effect. It appears to be related to the resync
process, and makes the system lock up, hard.
The steps to reproduce are:
1. Be running
Bodo Thiesen wrote:
Hi, I have a little problem:
Some hours ago the second of four disks were kicked out of my RAID5 thus
rendering it unusable. As of my current knowledge, the disks are still working
correctly (I assume a cable connection problem) but that's not the problem. The
real
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
On 12/1/06, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you so much for verifying this. I do keep enough room on my drives
to run tests by creating any kind of whatever I need, but the point is
clear: with N drives striped the transfer rate is N x base
11 matches
Mail list logo
