RE: [PATCH 3.12 033/118] usb: xhci: Link TRB must not occur within a USB payload burst [NEW HARDWARE]

2014-01-20 Thread David Laight
From: On 01/17/2014 06:34 AM, David Laight wrote: Can you try the patch I posted that stops the ownership on LINK TRBs being changed before that on the linked-to TRB? Sadly, the patch didn't fix the ASMedia lockup behavior, however :( I did notice that the lockup occurred only when

RE: [PATCH 3.12 033/118] usb: xhci: Link TRB must not occur within a USB payload burst [NEW HARDWARE]

2014-01-20 Thread David Laight
From: walt On 01/17/2014 06:34 AM, David Laight wrote: Can you try the patch I posted that stops the ownership on LINK TRBs being changed before that on the linked-to TRB? Please disregard my earlier post about the patch not applying cleanly. That was the usual html corruption, so I

Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND] interest in blk-mq, scsi-mq, dm-cache, dm-thinp, dm-*

2014-01-20 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 1/16/2014 6:34 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: On 1/10/2014 8:27 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: I would like to attend to participate in discussions related to topics listed in the subject. As a maintainer of DM I'd be interested to learn/discuss areas that should become a development focus in the months

Re: Disk spin-up optimization during system resume

2014-01-20 Thread CrashPlan Pro
Dan Williams wrote at 18-01-14 05:09: Larger systems are less likely to ever sleep. I have to agree with this. There is almost no storage server that will be suspended to sleep. Users of storage servers rather see an improvement at reboot time. For example by not re-enumerating all 40 / 80

RE: [PATCH] isci: reformulate for_each_isci_host macro to fix an oops

2014-01-20 Thread Dorau, Lukasz
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:16 PM Lukasz Dorau lukasz.do...@intel.com wrote: The loop 'for' in macro 'for_each_isci_host' (drivers/scsi/isci/init.c:717) is executed more times than it can be. Regardless the condition: 'id ARRAY_SIZE(to_pci_info(pdev)-hosts)'

Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.

2014-01-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:07:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: Yes, I think it can be done relatively simply. We'd have to change the code in xfs_file_aio_write_checks() to check whether EOF zeroing was required rather than always taking an exclusive lock (for block aligned IO at EOF sub-block

Re: Disk spin-up optimization during system resume

2014-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/20/2014 7:38 AM, CrashPlan Pro wrote: Dan Williams wrote at 18-01-14 05:09: Larger systems are less likely to ever sleep. I have to agree with this. There is almost no storage server that will be suspended to sleep. Users of storage

[PATCH] isci: correct erroneous for_each_isci_host macro

2014-01-20 Thread Lukasz Dorau
In the first place, the loop 'for' in the macro 'for_each_isci_host' (drivers/scsi/isci/host.h:314) is incorrect, because it accesses the 3rd element of 2 element array. After the 2nd iteration it executes the instruction: ihost = to_pci_info(pdev)-hosts[2] (while the size of the 'hosts'

Re: [PATCH 3.12 033/118] usb: xhci: Link TRB must not occur within a USB payload burst [NEW HARDWARE]

2014-01-20 Thread Sarah Sharp
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:21:14AM +, David Laight wrote: From: walt On 01/17/2014 06:34 AM, David Laight wrote: Can you try the patch I posted that stops the ownership on LINK TRBs being changed before that on the linked-to TRB? Please disregard my earlier post about the

Re: usb disk recognized but fails

2014-01-20 Thread Sarah Sharp
Cc-ing the USB storage list, in case this device needs some quirk. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:47:39PM +0100, Milan Svoboda wrote: The SATA adapter has a power input, but it is not used, it is connected to the PC with Y-type USB cable. The disk works with my smart TV, it works with Windows on

Re: [PATCH] isci: correct erroneous for_each_isci_host macro

2014-01-20 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Lukasz Dorau lukasz.do...@intel.com wrote: In the first place, the loop 'for' in the macro 'for_each_isci_host' (drivers/scsi/isci/host.h:314) is incorrect, because it accesses the 3rd element of 2 element array. After the 2nd iteration it executes the

[Bug 60644] MPT2SAS drops all HDDs when under high I/O

2014-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60644 --- Comment #45 from Jeff Johnson jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com --- I ran more detailed tests this weekend. ASPM MSI disabled = stable machine under zfs load ASPM disabled / MSI enabled = stable machine under zfs load ASPM enabled / MSI

[Bug 60644] MPT2SAS drops all HDDs when under high I/O

2014-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60644 --- Comment #46 from Jeff Johnson jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com --- addendum/corrections to last... LSI 9207-8i with phase 17 firmware. Motherboards with Intel C602 chipset appear to be functioning w/o issue Apologies.. not enough coffee

Re: usb disk recognized but fails

2014-01-20 Thread Milan Svoboda
Non-working: 3.12.7-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jan 12 13:09:09 CET 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux I'm sorry, I don't remember exactly which version worked, I have had the disk connected to TV for a long time and only recently I wanted to copy some movies on it. I guess it worked something like 6 or 9

Re: Why is (2 2) true? Is it a gcc bug?

2014-01-20 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Dorau, Lukasz lukasz.do...@intel.com wrote: On Friday, January 17, 2014 10:44 PM Alexei Starovoitov alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de wrote: On 2014.01.17 at 11:58 -0800, Alexei

Re: usb disk recognized but fails

2014-01-20 Thread Sarah Sharp
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:00:23PM +0100, Milan Svoboda wrote: Non-working: 3.12.7-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jan 12 13:09:09 CET 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux I'm sorry, I don't remember exactly which version worked, I have had the disk connected to TV for a long time and only recently I wanted

Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.

2014-01-20 Thread Dave Chinner
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:58:55AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:07:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: Yes, I think it can be done relatively simply. We'd have to change the code in xfs_file_aio_write_checks() to check whether EOF zeroing was required rather than

[Bug 60644] MPT2SAS drops all HDDs when under high I/O

2014-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60644 --- Comment #47 from Konstantin ktrac...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the hint at ASPM ! After disabling it in the BIOS I was able to scrub my zpool without a single issue. # zpool status scan: scrub repaired 0 in 6h32m with 0 errors on Tue Jan

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] scsi_eh updates

2014-01-20 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 01/20/2014 07:44 PM, Giridhar Malavali wrote: On 12/20/13 6:54 AM, Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de wrote: [ .. ] As discussed during last year's LSF the SCSI error handler should be updated to handle modern SCSI transports better. While some patchsets are already merged, there are some

Re: LSF/MM 2014 Call For Proposals

2014-01-20 Thread Michel Lespinasse
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote: The annual Linux Storage, Filesystem and Memory Management Summit for 2014 will be held on March 24th and 25th before the Linux Foundation Collaboration summit at The Meritage Resort, Napa Valley, CA.

[patch] [SCSI] qla2xxx: fix error handling of qla2x00_mem_alloc()

2014-01-20 Thread Dan Carpenter
qla2x00_mem_alloc() returns 1 on success and -ENOMEM on failure. On the one hand the caller assumes non-zero is success but on the other hand the caller also assumes that it returns an error code. I've fixed it to return zero on success and a negative error code on failure. This matches the

[LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] scsi_eh updates, scsi-mq

2014-01-20 Thread Giridhar Malavali
I would like to attend to participate in discussions related to topic mentioned in the subject line. I would like to learn/discuss the changes in the following areas and plan supporting them in qla2xxx (LLDs). Thanks, Giri attachment: winmail.dat