On 04/08/2013 05:37 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 04/05/2013 05:24 PM, James Smart wrote:
On 4/4/2013 6:17 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/31/2013 07:44 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
What we can do is to decode the LUN and compare it to max_lun provided by
the driver,
I think that sg_luns is able to
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] scsi: 64-bit LUN support
On 04/08/2013 05:37 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 04/05/2013 05:24 PM, James Smart wrote:
On 4/4/2013 6:17 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/31/2013 07:44 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
You are right in the sense that 'max_lun' actually has a double
; Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); Bart Van Assche;
Bud Brown
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] scsi: 64-bit LUN support
On 04/08/2013 05:37 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 04/05/2013 05:24 PM, James Smart wrote:
On 4/4/2013 6:17 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/31/2013 07:44 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
You
On 04/05/2013 05:24 PM, James Smart wrote:
On 4/4/2013 6:17 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/31/2013 07:44 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
What we can do is to decode the LUN and compare it to max_lun provided by
the driver,
I think that sg_luns is able to do that, so what is needed is just to
On 4/4/2013 6:17 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/31/2013 07:44 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
What we can do is to decode the LUN and compare it to max_lun provided by the
driver,
I think that sg_luns is able to do that, so what is needed is just to follow
the SAM.
I have seen reports of problem
On 03/31/2013 07:44 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 03/30/2013 05:53 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/29/2013 05:32 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
[ .. ]
in scsi_report_lun_scan is max_lun compared with the result of
scsilun_to_int,
but in that value is also stored the address method. This means, that we
On 03/30/2013 05:53 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/29/2013 05:32 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 03/27/2013 08:37 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/26/2013 07:00 PM, Chad Dupuis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs
On 03/29/2013 05:32 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 03/27/2013 08:37 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/26/2013 07:00 PM, Chad Dupuis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs
internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number
On 03/27/2013 08:37 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/26/2013 07:00 PM, Chad Dupuis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs
internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number of LUNs artificially to
avoid aliasing
On 03/26/2013 07:00 PM, Chad Dupuis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs
internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number of LUNs artificially to
avoid aliasing issues; the SCSI midlayer can now accept any LUN
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 03/26/2013 07:00 PM, Chad Dupuis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs
internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number of LUNs artificially to
avoid aliasing
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number of LUNs artificially to
avoid aliasing issues; the SCSI midlayer can now accept any LUN presented
to it.
The LLDD specific settings
On 13-03-26 02:00 PM, Chad Dupuis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number of LUNs artificially to
avoid aliasing issues; the SCSI midlayer can now accept any LUN
On 13-02-21 11:32 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 16:15 +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
Regarding changes like this:
- printk(MYIOC_s_NOTE_FMT [%d:%d:%d:%d]
+ printk(MYIOC_s_NOTE_FMT [%d:%d:%d:%llu]
On 02/21/2013 05:15 PM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
Regarding changes like this:
- printk(MYIOC_s_NOTE_FMT [%d:%d:%d:%d]
+ printk(MYIOC_s_NOTE_FMT [%d:%d:%d:%llu]
FCP_ResponseInfo=%08xh\n, ioc-name,
; Hannes Reinecke
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] scsi: 64-bit LUN support
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number of LUNs artificially to
avoid aliasing issues; the SCSI midlayer can now accept any LUN presented
to it.
The LLDD
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 16:15 +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
Regarding changes like this:
- printk(MYIOC_s_NOTE_FMT [%d:%d:%d:%d]
+ printk(MYIOC_s_NOTE_FMT [%d:%d:%d:%llu]
FCP_ResponseInfo=%08xh\n, ioc-name,
This patchset updates the SCSI midlayer to use 64-bit LUNs internally.
It eliminates the need to limit the number of LUNs artificially to
avoid aliasing issues; the SCSI midlayer can now accept any LUN presented
to it.
The LLDD specific settings for 'max_lun' have been left untouched;
it should
18 matches
Mail list logo
