On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:10:25PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:04:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > So we keep things as they are right now or are we getting also rid of
> > the internal list? This was tested by Johannes and Chad (claimed to do
> >
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:04:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So we keep things as they are right now or are we getting also rid of
> the internal list? This was tested by Johannes and Chad (claimed to do
> testing)
IFF the patches actually are tested as-is let's get them in. I
On 2016-11-07 17:48:46 [+0100], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > sorry for the confusion in the subject. If I remember correctly you said
> > that we may not have enough room for a larger / work_struct struct and I
> > should
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> sorry for the confusion in the subject. If I remember correctly you said
> that we may not have enough room for a larger / work_struct struct and I
> should keep the list for now.
But that was for libfc where it only has
On 2016-11-07 17:38:48 [+0100], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> You're right it does - between the incorrect subject and the fact
> that it still keeps the linked list of items arounds instead of fully
> using the workqueue infrastructure I was a bit confused before my
> first coffee this morning.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:31:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > It seems like the whole damn driver should just use threaded interrupts.
> > Of course it's a giant beast and not just the iSCSI one. But even
> > if we don't go all the way I'd
On 2016-09-14 13:25:12 [-0400], Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Chad" == Chad Dupuis writes:
>
> Chad> We're regression testing the patches now. Please hold off on
> Chad> applying them.
>
> OK. I will wait.
Chad, any updates on this tests?
Sebastian
--
To
> "Chad" == Chad Dupuis writes:
Johannes> Testing was conducted by booting from a QLogic BCM57840 CNA.
Chad> We're regression testing the patches now. Please hold off on
Chad> applying them.
OK. I will wait.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, 11:28am -, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Johannes" == Johannes Thumshirn writes:
>
> >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> wrote:
> >> The driver creates its own per-CPU threads which are updated based on
> >>
> "Johannes" == Johannes Thumshirn writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> The driver creates its own per-CPU threads which are updated based on
>> CPU hotplug events. It is also possible to use kworkers and remove
>> some
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The driver creates its own per-CPU threads which are updated based on CPU
> hotplug events. It is also possible to use kworkers and remove some of the
> infrastructure get the same job done while saving a few lines of
The driver creates its own per-CPU threads which are updated based on CPU
hotplug events. It is also possible to use kworkers and remove some of the
infrastructure get the same job done while saving a few lines of code.
The DECLARE_PER_CPU() definition is moved into the header file where it
12 matches
Mail list logo